THE METATHEORETICAL SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE TRUTH

S. Lebedev
{"title":"THE METATHEORETICAL SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE TRUTH","authors":"S. Lebedev","doi":"10.18384/2310-7227-2020-3-98-103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Aim. The article aims at analyzing the problem of truth of metatheoretical level of scientific knowledge. Methodology. With the help of the reconstruction method, the main structural units of metatheoretical knowledge in science are identified and briefly described: paradigm theories, scientific picture of the world, ideals and norms of scientific research, philosophical foundations of science. The specificity of the content and functions of each of these units is analyzed. One of the important consequences of this specificity is the absence of a uniform criterion of truth for different units of metatheoretical knowledge. Results. The multicomponent structure of the criteria of truth of various elements of metatheoretical knowledge is shown. A common component of these criteria is the consensus of the disciplinary community of the relevant field of science. Research implications consists in the development of a more specific theory than is available in the modern methodology of science, the theory of truth of the metatheoretical level of knowledge in science.","PeriodicalId":33732,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta Seriia Filosofskie nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta Seriia Filosofskie nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2020-3-98-103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

. Aim. The article aims at analyzing the problem of truth of metatheoretical level of scientific knowledge. Methodology. With the help of the reconstruction method, the main structural units of metatheoretical knowledge in science are identified and briefly described: paradigm theories, scientific picture of the world, ideals and norms of scientific research, philosophical foundations of science. The specificity of the content and functions of each of these units is analyzed. One of the important consequences of this specificity is the absence of a uniform criterion of truth for different units of metatheoretical knowledge. Results. The multicomponent structure of the criteria of truth of various elements of metatheoretical knowledge is shown. A common component of these criteria is the consensus of the disciplinary community of the relevant field of science. Research implications consists in the development of a more specific theory than is available in the modern methodology of science, the theory of truth of the metatheoretical level of knowledge in science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
元理论的科学知识真理
. 的目标。本文旨在分析科学知识元理论层面的真理性问题。方法。借助重构方法,确定并简要描述了科学中元理论知识的主要结构单元:范式理论、科学的世界图景、科学研究的理想与规范、科学的哲学基础。分析了各单元的内容和功能的特殊性。这种专一性的一个重要后果是,元理论知识的不同单位缺乏统一的真理标准。结果。揭示了元理论知识的各种要素的真理标准的多成分结构。这些标准的一个共同组成部分是相关科学领域的学科共同体的共识。研究意义在于发展一种比现代科学方法论更具体的理论,即科学知识元理论层面的真理理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Improvement of Object Classification in Systems Theory Russian Philosophy in School as an Important Factor in the Formation of the Modern Progressive World View Philosophy of Life from Arthur Schopenhauer to Boris Pasternak Pedagogy in German Enlightenment in the History of Philosophy: Moses Mendelssohn and Johann Bernhard Basedow Scientific Knowledge and Value Limitation: A Social and Philosophical Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1