Field evaluation of the performance of different irrigation emitter types using treated wastewater

IF 2 Q3 Environmental Science Water Quality Research Journal of Canada Pub Date : 2015-08-01 DOI:10.2166/WQRJC.2015.043
N. Al‐Mefleh, I. Bashabsheh, S. Talozi, T. Al-Issa
{"title":"Field evaluation of the performance of different irrigation emitter types using treated wastewater","authors":"N. Al‐Mefleh, I. Bashabsheh, S. Talozi, T. Al-Issa","doi":"10.2166/WQRJC.2015.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experimental tests are carried out to evaluate the impact of treated wastewater (TWW) on the discharge of five different types of emitters which are commonly used. Two water qualities, fresh water (FW) and treated wastewater, and five types of emitters, GR, Nein (NE), Edin (ED), Corona (CO), and Rain Bird (RB) are tested. The values of chemical properties for FW show mostly low clogging potential on emitter performance. The clogging potential for TWW varied from low to medium. The exception was for pH where there was severe clogging potential for both water types. The performance of emitters was tested by measuring the emitter discharge and estimating the average emitter discharge ( Q avg), coefficient of variation (CV), emission uniformity coefficient (EU), and Christiansen uniformity coefficient (CU). The average discharges for different types of emitters were analyzed and compared at P ≤ 0.05. The CO and RB emitter types did not show any signs of clogging whereas the GR, NE, and ED emitter types showed signs of clogging. The results of CV, EU, and CU values showed that the performances of emitter types GR, NE, ED were classified as low or moderate clogging potential. In contrast, the CO and RB emitters were classified as moderate or high clogging potential.","PeriodicalId":54407,"journal":{"name":"Water Quality Research Journal of Canada","volume":"50 1","pages":"240-251"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2166/WQRJC.2015.043","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Quality Research Journal of Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/WQRJC.2015.043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Experimental tests are carried out to evaluate the impact of treated wastewater (TWW) on the discharge of five different types of emitters which are commonly used. Two water qualities, fresh water (FW) and treated wastewater, and five types of emitters, GR, Nein (NE), Edin (ED), Corona (CO), and Rain Bird (RB) are tested. The values of chemical properties for FW show mostly low clogging potential on emitter performance. The clogging potential for TWW varied from low to medium. The exception was for pH where there was severe clogging potential for both water types. The performance of emitters was tested by measuring the emitter discharge and estimating the average emitter discharge ( Q avg), coefficient of variation (CV), emission uniformity coefficient (EU), and Christiansen uniformity coefficient (CU). The average discharges for different types of emitters were analyzed and compared at P ≤ 0.05. The CO and RB emitter types did not show any signs of clogging whereas the GR, NE, and ED emitter types showed signs of clogging. The results of CV, EU, and CU values showed that the performances of emitter types GR, NE, ED were classified as low or moderate clogging potential. In contrast, the CO and RB emitters were classified as moderate or high clogging potential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用处理过的废水对不同灌溉灌水器类型的性能进行实地评价
进行了试验测试,以评估处理后的废水对五种不同类型的常用排放者排放的影响。测试了淡水(FW)和处理后的废水两种水质,以及GR、Nein (NE)、Edin (ED)、Corona (CO)和Rain Bird (RB)五种类型的排放物。FW的化学性质值大多显示出对发射器性能的低堵塞潜力。TWW的堵塞潜势从低到中不等。pH值的例外情况是,两种水类型都有严重堵塞的可能。通过测量发射体放电,估算平均发射体放电(Q avg)、变异系数(CV)、发射均匀性系数(EU)和克里斯蒂安森均匀性系数(CU)来测试发射体的性能。对不同类型发射体的平均排放量进行分析比较,P≤0.05。CO和RB发射器类型没有显示任何堵塞迹象,而GR, NE和ED发射器类型显示堵塞迹象。CV、EU和CU值分析结果表明,GR、NE、ED型发射极的堵塞势为低堵塞势或中等堵塞势。相比之下,CO和RB排放物被划分为中等或高堵塞电位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Water Quality Research Journal publishes peer-reviewed, scholarly articles on the following general subject areas: Impact of current and emerging contaminants on aquatic ecosystems Aquatic ecology (ecohydrology and ecohydraulics, invasive species, biodiversity, and aquatic species at risk) Conservation and protection of aquatic environments Responsible resource development and water quality (mining, forestry, hydropower, oil and gas) Drinking water, wastewater and stormwater treatment technologies and strategies Impacts and solutions of diffuse pollution (urban and agricultural run-off) on water quality Industrial water quality Used water: Reuse and resource recovery Groundwater quality (management, remediation, fracking, legacy contaminants) Assessment of surface and subsurface water quality Regulations, economics, strategies and policies related to water quality Social science issues in relation to water quality Water quality in remote areas Water quality in cold climates The Water Quality Research Journal is a quarterly publication. It is a forum for original research dealing with the aquatic environment, and should report new and significant findings that advance the understanding of the field. Critical review articles are especially encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Carbon filtration: harnessing cotton's power to purify drinking water Development of an online analyser to meet challenging new discharge limits for mercury in flue gas desulphurisation wastewater Single-wavelength colorimetric tests for low-cost estimation of bacterial activity, chemical oxygen demand, and turbidity in domestic wastewater Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient for Typha latifolia in constructed wetlands Editorial: New Energy for Water Quality Research!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1