Beyond autonomy and beneficence: the moral basis of euthanasia in the Netherlands.

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 ETHICS Ethical Perspectives Pub Date : 2002-01-01 DOI:10.2143/EP.9.2.503849
G. Widdershoven
{"title":"Beyond autonomy and beneficence: the moral basis of euthanasia in the Netherlands.","authors":"G. Widdershoven","doi":"10.2143/EP.9.2.503849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are controversial issues in medical ethics and medical law. In the debate, several arguments against the moral acceptability and legal feasibility of active involvement of physicians in bringing about a patient’s death can be found. One argument refers back to the Ten Commandments: “Thou shall not kill”. Killing another human being is morally abject. According to the argument, this is certainly so for medical doctors, as can be seen in the Hippocratic Oath, which explicitly forbids abortion and euthanasia. A less apodictic argument refers to the slippery slope: if euthanasia would be permitted, a downhill movement is set in motion. The end of this movement would be, on the one hand, that physicians will feel forced to assist people who ask for termination of life on whatever grounds. On the other hand, it might lead to a situation in which it becomes normal to kill people who are no longer useful for society.","PeriodicalId":54109,"journal":{"name":"Ethical Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/EP.9.2.503849","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethical Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.9.2.503849","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are controversial issues in medical ethics and medical law. In the debate, several arguments against the moral acceptability and legal feasibility of active involvement of physicians in bringing about a patient’s death can be found. One argument refers back to the Ten Commandments: “Thou shall not kill”. Killing another human being is morally abject. According to the argument, this is certainly so for medical doctors, as can be seen in the Hippocratic Oath, which explicitly forbids abortion and euthanasia. A less apodictic argument refers to the slippery slope: if euthanasia would be permitted, a downhill movement is set in motion. The end of this movement would be, on the one hand, that physicians will feel forced to assist people who ask for termination of life on whatever grounds. On the other hand, it might lead to a situation in which it becomes normal to kill people who are no longer useful for society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越自主与慈善:荷兰安乐死的道德基础。
安乐死和医生协助自杀是医学伦理学和医学法学中有争议的问题。在辩论中,可以找到一些反对医生积极参与导致病人死亡的道德可接受性和法律可行性的论点。一种说法是指十诫:“不可杀人”。杀害另一个人在道德上是卑鄙的。根据该论点,医生当然也是如此,正如希波克拉底誓言中明确禁止堕胎和安乐死所看到的那样。一个不那么明确的论点是关于滑坡效应的:如果允许安乐死,滑坡运动就会开始。这一运动的结果将是,一方面,医生将被迫帮助那些以任何理由要求终止生命的人。另一方面,它可能会导致一种情况,即杀死对社会不再有用的人成为常态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A particularist account of moral principles Experimenting with Basic Income Inspired Experiments Relational Normative Economics: An African Approach to Justice Précis of John Rawls: Reticent Socialist A comparison of approaches to virtue for nursing ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1