Effect of Removal of Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolata, Brassicaeae) on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculum Potential in Forest Soils

Q2 Environmental Science Open Ecology Journal Pub Date : 2010-07-01 DOI:10.2174/1874213001003010041
R. C. Anderson, M. R. Anderson, J. T. Bauer, Mitchell A. Slater, J. Herold, Patrice E. Baumhardt, V. Borowicz
{"title":"Effect of Removal of Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolata, Brassicaeae) on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculum Potential in Forest Soils","authors":"R. C. Anderson, M. R. Anderson, J. T. Bauer, Mitchell A. Slater, J. Herold, Patrice E. Baumhardt, V. Borowicz","doi":"10.2174/1874213001003010041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), a biennial species, is considered to be among the most troublesome of the invasive plants in the Eastern Deciduous forest of North America. It has been shown to prevent or reduce mycorrhizal colonization of native herbaceous ground layer plants and trees in these forests. It is estimated that 70-90% or more of herbaceous native ground layer plant species form associations with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Loss of the mycorrhizal association can reduce growth, reproductive success, and competitiveness of plant species. Using a corn root bioassay, we examined the effect of garlic mustard removal on the soil AMF mycorrhizal inoculum potential (MIP), in control plots and plots that had second-year garlic mustard removed annually for the past five years (2005-2009). Removal treatment plots had significantly (P = 0.0240, df = 28) greater MIP than control plots (25.72±2.26% and 18.29±2.04%, respectively). MIP was negatively correlated with cover of garlic mustard (r 2 = 0.1325, P < 0.05, df = 30), which accounted for 13.2% of the variation in MIP. Cover of native vegetation in removal treatment plots (104.50±2.6%) was greater than that of the control plots (95.14±3.66%), (P = 0.0236, df = 115). These results show that removal of garlic mustard results in an increase in soil MIP and cover of native species; however, there is not a complete loss of MIP associated with garlic mustard invasion. Following removal of garlic mustard, our data suggest that mycorrhizal plants recover more slowly than non-mycorrhizal species, apparently due to a delay in the establishment of a well-functioning mycorrhizal association. Our study is the first to demonstrate that the MIP of native soils and cover of native species increase following reduction in the cover of garlic mustard.","PeriodicalId":39335,"journal":{"name":"Open Ecology Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"41-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Ecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874213001003010041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), a biennial species, is considered to be among the most troublesome of the invasive plants in the Eastern Deciduous forest of North America. It has been shown to prevent or reduce mycorrhizal colonization of native herbaceous ground layer plants and trees in these forests. It is estimated that 70-90% or more of herbaceous native ground layer plant species form associations with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Loss of the mycorrhizal association can reduce growth, reproductive success, and competitiveness of plant species. Using a corn root bioassay, we examined the effect of garlic mustard removal on the soil AMF mycorrhizal inoculum potential (MIP), in control plots and plots that had second-year garlic mustard removed annually for the past five years (2005-2009). Removal treatment plots had significantly (P = 0.0240, df = 28) greater MIP than control plots (25.72±2.26% and 18.29±2.04%, respectively). MIP was negatively correlated with cover of garlic mustard (r 2 = 0.1325, P < 0.05, df = 30), which accounted for 13.2% of the variation in MIP. Cover of native vegetation in removal treatment plots (104.50±2.6%) was greater than that of the control plots (95.14±3.66%), (P = 0.0236, df = 115). These results show that removal of garlic mustard results in an increase in soil MIP and cover of native species; however, there is not a complete loss of MIP associated with garlic mustard invasion. Following removal of garlic mustard, our data suggest that mycorrhizal plants recover more slowly than non-mycorrhizal species, apparently due to a delay in the establishment of a well-functioning mycorrhizal association. Our study is the first to demonstrate that the MIP of native soils and cover of native species increase following reduction in the cover of garlic mustard.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
去除蒜芥菜对森林土壤丛枝菌根真菌接种势的影响
大蒜芥(Alliaria petiolata)是一种二年生植物,被认为是北美东部落叶林中最麻烦的入侵植物之一。它已被证明可以防止或减少这些森林中原生草本地面植物和树木的菌根定植。据估计,70-90%或更多的草本原生地层层植物物种与丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)形成关联。菌根结合的丧失会降低植物物种的生长、繁殖成功率和竞争力。利用玉米根系生物测定法,研究了在过去5年(2005-2009年)的对照地块和每年去除第二年大蒜芥末的地块中,去除大蒜芥末对土壤AMF菌根接种势(MIP)的影响。去除处理区MIP显著(P = 0.0240, df = 28)高于对照组(分别为25.72±2.26%和18.29±2.04%)。MIP与芥菜盖度呈负相关(r 2 = 0.1325, P < 0.05, df = 30),占MIP变异的13.2%。去除处理区原生植被盖度(104.50±2.6%)高于对照区(95.14±3.66%),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.0236, df = 115)。结果表明,去除芥菜会增加土壤MIP和本地物种的覆盖;然而,并没有完全丧失与大蒜芥末入侵有关的MIP。在去除大蒜芥末后,我们的数据表明,菌根植物比非菌根植物恢复得更慢,显然是由于建立一个功能良好的菌根关联的延迟。我们的研究首次证明了本地土壤的MIP和本地物种的覆盖随着大蒜芥覆盖的减少而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Ecology Journal
Open Ecology Journal Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Open Ecology Journal is an open access online journal which embraces the trans-disciplinary nature of ecology, seeking to publish original research articles, reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues representing important scientific progress from all areas of ecology and its linkages to other fields. The journal also focuses on the basic principles of the natural environment and its conservation. Contributions may be based on any taxa, natural or artificial environments, biodiversity, spatial scales, temporal scales, and methods that advance this multi-faceted and dynamic science. The Open Ecology Journal also considers empirical and theoretical studies that promote the construction of a broadly applicable conceptual framework or that present rigorous tests or novel applications of ecological theory.
期刊最新文献
ABUNDANCE OF INSECT POLLINATORS IN A MUSTARD FIELD AT DINAJPUR IN BANGLADESH DIETARY DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE SUPPLEMENTATION ENHANCES PRODUCTIVE AND REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCES OF CROSSBRED AND LOCAL DAIRY COWS RUGOSE SPIRALING WHITEFLY INFESTATION ON COCONUT: THREATS AND REMEDY ECO-FRIENDLY MANAGEMENT OF ANTHRACNOSE OF CHILI USING FORMULATED TRICHODERMA AND INDIGENOUS MEDICINAL PLANT MUNGBEAN VARIETIES EXPRESSED VARIATION IN MORPHOPHYSIOLOGICAL TRAITS AND YIELD UNDER WATER STRESS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1