Statistical Evaluation of Haploid Genetic Evidence

T. Egeland, A. Salas
{"title":"Statistical Evaluation of Haploid Genetic Evidence","authors":"T. Egeland, A. Salas","doi":"10.2174/1874402800801010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A variety of forensic cases need to be based on haploid DNA. The statistical evaluation of the genetic evidence in such cases requires particular attention and methods. There may be considerable differences between databases and this must be accounted for when there is uncertainty about the population origin of the perpetrator. We here assume access to the relevant databases sampled from populations that the perpetrator may conceivably come from. Intuitively, if there are strong reasons to claim that a specific database is particularly relevant, the likelihood ratio should be influenced accord- ingly. Moreover, the haploid evidence is typically weaker than for nuclear DNA and there is therefore a greater need to assess uncertainty; here we have chosen the bootstrap method. We also discuss the ability of the proposed method to ac- count for population stratification when computing the LR. A pilot implementation of the haploeve software is freely available.","PeriodicalId":88327,"journal":{"name":"The open forensic science journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"4-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open forensic science journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874402800801010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

A variety of forensic cases need to be based on haploid DNA. The statistical evaluation of the genetic evidence in such cases requires particular attention and methods. There may be considerable differences between databases and this must be accounted for when there is uncertainty about the population origin of the perpetrator. We here assume access to the relevant databases sampled from populations that the perpetrator may conceivably come from. Intuitively, if there are strong reasons to claim that a specific database is particularly relevant, the likelihood ratio should be influenced accord- ingly. Moreover, the haploid evidence is typically weaker than for nuclear DNA and there is therefore a greater need to assess uncertainty; here we have chosen the bootstrap method. We also discuss the ability of the proposed method to ac- count for population stratification when computing the LR. A pilot implementation of the haploeve software is freely available.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单倍体遗传证据的统计评价
各种各样的法医案件需要基于单倍体DNA。在这种情况下对遗传证据的统计评估需要特别注意和方法。数据库之间可能存在相当大的差异,当犯罪者的人口来源不确定时,必须考虑到这一点。在这里,我们假设可以访问从肇事者可能来自的人群中抽样的相关数据库。直观地说,如果有充分的理由声称某个特定数据库是特别相关的,那么似然比应该受到相应的影响。此外,单倍体证据通常比核DNA证据弱,因此更需要评估不确定性;这里我们选择了bootstrap方法。我们还讨论了该方法在计算LR时对种群分层进行ac计数的能力。haploeve软件的试点实现是免费的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forensic Wildlife Parts and their Product Identification and Individualization Using DNA Barcoding Recovering Dusty Shoe Prints from Skin: Comparative Research Impact of Allogrooming in Domestic Cats (Felis silvestris catus) on Mitochondrial DNA Profiling of Shed Hairs Experimental Study on Age Estimation of Bloodstains Based on Biological and Toxicological Analysis Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Collected with Carrion-Baited Traps in Southeast Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1