The Non-Specificity of the Duquenois-Levine Field Test for Marijuana

J. F. Kelly
{"title":"The Non-Specificity of the Duquenois-Levine Field Test for Marijuana","authors":"J. F. Kelly","doi":"10.2174/1874402801205010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to determine the specificity, or lack thereof, of the Duquenois-Levine (D-L) field test kit in the identification of marijuana. Out of the forty-two samples tested, patchouli, spearmint, and eucalyptus tested positive for marijuana using the D-L field test. From these results, it can be concluded that the test is non-specific and can yield false positives. Therefore, it cannot be legitimately used for the prosecution or conviction of an individual for violations of the anti-marijuana laws as it does not provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt of the presence of marijuana. In fact, law enforcement personnel and the test kit manufacturer claim that the D-L field test is a specific, identification test with near perfect accuracy. In court, police officers testify falsely to the identification of marijuana in a seized substance based solely on the D-L test and other non-specific, screening tests leading to convictions. The result is the denial of the Constitutionally-guaranteed right to a fair trial, due process and countless wrongful marijuana convictions.","PeriodicalId":88327,"journal":{"name":"The open forensic science journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"4-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open forensic science journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874402801205010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the specificity, or lack thereof, of the Duquenois-Levine (D-L) field test kit in the identification of marijuana. Out of the forty-two samples tested, patchouli, spearmint, and eucalyptus tested positive for marijuana using the D-L field test. From these results, it can be concluded that the test is non-specific and can yield false positives. Therefore, it cannot be legitimately used for the prosecution or conviction of an individual for violations of the anti-marijuana laws as it does not provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt of the presence of marijuana. In fact, law enforcement personnel and the test kit manufacturer claim that the D-L field test is a specific, identification test with near perfect accuracy. In court, police officers testify falsely to the identification of marijuana in a seized substance based solely on the D-L test and other non-specific, screening tests leading to convictions. The result is the denial of the Constitutionally-guaranteed right to a fair trial, due process and countless wrongful marijuana convictions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大麻Duquenois-Levine现场试验的非特异性
本研究的目的是确定Duquenois-Levine (D-L)现场测试试剂盒在大麻鉴定中的特异性或缺乏特异性。在测试的42个样本中,广藿香、绿薄荷和桉树在D-L现场测试中被检测出大麻阳性。从这些结果可以得出结论,该测试是非特异性的,可能产生假阳性。因此,它不能合法地用于对违反反大麻法的个人进行起诉或定罪,因为它不能提供超出合理怀疑的大麻存在的证据。事实上,执法人员和测试套件制造商声称,D-L现场测试是一个特定的,具有近乎完美的准确性的识别测试。在法庭上,警察仅仅根据D-L测试和其他非特异性筛选测试,就虚假地证明在缴获的物质中发现了大麻,从而导致定罪。其结果是剥夺了宪法保障的公平审判、正当程序和无数错误的大麻定罪的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forensic Wildlife Parts and their Product Identification and Individualization Using DNA Barcoding Recovering Dusty Shoe Prints from Skin: Comparative Research Impact of Allogrooming in Domestic Cats (Felis silvestris catus) on Mitochondrial DNA Profiling of Shed Hairs Experimental Study on Age Estimation of Bloodstains Based on Biological and Toxicological Analysis Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Collected with Carrion-Baited Traps in Southeast Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1