Privacy as Trust: Sharing Personal Information in a Networked World

A. Waldman
{"title":"Privacy as Trust: Sharing Personal Information in a Networked World","authors":"A. Waldman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2309632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article is the first in a series on the legal and sociological aspects of privacy, arguing that private contexts are defined by relationships of trust among individuals. The argument reorients privacy scholarship from an individual right to social relationships of disclosure. This has implications for a wide variety of vexing problems of modern privacy law, from limited disclosures to “revenge porn.” The common everyday understanding is that privacy is about choice, autonomy, and individual freedom. It encompasses the individual’s right to determine what he will keep hidden and what, how, and when he will disclose to the public. Privacy is his respite from the prying, conformist eyes of the rest of the world and his expectation that the things about himself that he wants to keep private will remain so. These ways of understanding privacy are variations on the same theme: that privacy is a tool of the individual “against the world.” None of them adequately protect personal privacy where sharing personal information with others is a precondition of modern life. This Article argues that privacy is really about trust. Rather than accept the traditional division between public and private, and rather than begin and end the discussion of privacy as an individual right, this Article bridges social science and the law to argue that disclosures in contexts of trust are private. Trusting relationships are determined by the presence of experience, strong overlapping networks, identity sharing, and other indicia derived from the totality of the circumstances. This conceptualization of privacy, and its related ways of defining when invasions of privacy occur, more effectively protects privacy in a modern digital world.","PeriodicalId":83419,"journal":{"name":"University of Miami law review","volume":"69 1","pages":"559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.2309632","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Miami law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2309632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

This Article is the first in a series on the legal and sociological aspects of privacy, arguing that private contexts are defined by relationships of trust among individuals. The argument reorients privacy scholarship from an individual right to social relationships of disclosure. This has implications for a wide variety of vexing problems of modern privacy law, from limited disclosures to “revenge porn.” The common everyday understanding is that privacy is about choice, autonomy, and individual freedom. It encompasses the individual’s right to determine what he will keep hidden and what, how, and when he will disclose to the public. Privacy is his respite from the prying, conformist eyes of the rest of the world and his expectation that the things about himself that he wants to keep private will remain so. These ways of understanding privacy are variations on the same theme: that privacy is a tool of the individual “against the world.” None of them adequately protect personal privacy where sharing personal information with others is a precondition of modern life. This Article argues that privacy is really about trust. Rather than accept the traditional division between public and private, and rather than begin and end the discussion of privacy as an individual right, this Article bridges social science and the law to argue that disclosures in contexts of trust are private. Trusting relationships are determined by the presence of experience, strong overlapping networks, identity sharing, and other indicia derived from the totality of the circumstances. This conceptualization of privacy, and its related ways of defining when invasions of privacy occur, more effectively protects privacy in a modern digital world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐私即信任:在网络世界中分享个人信息
本文是关于隐私的法律和社会学方面的系列文章中的第一篇,认为隐私环境是由个人之间的信任关系定义的。这一论点将隐私研究从个人权利转向披露的社会关系。这暗示了现代隐私法中各种各样令人烦恼的问题,从有限的信息披露到“复仇色情”。通常的日常理解是,隐私是关于选择、自主和个人自由的。它包含了个人决定他将保密的内容以及他将向公众披露的内容、方式和时间的权利。隐私是他从世界上其他人的窥探和墨守成规的目光中得到的喘息,也是他希望自己想要保密的事情保持隐私的期望。这些理解隐私的方式都是同一个主题的变体:隐私是个人“对抗世界”的工具。在与他人分享个人信息是现代生活的先决条件的情况下,它们都没有充分保护个人隐私。本文认为,隐私实际上与信任有关。本文没有接受公共和私人之间的传统划分,也没有开始和结束隐私作为一项个人权利的讨论,而是将社会科学和法律联系起来,认为在信任的背景下披露是私人的。信任关系是由经验的存在、强大的重叠网络、身份共享和其他来自整体环境的指标决定的。这种对隐私的概念化,以及定义何时侵犯隐私的相关方法,更有效地保护了现代数字世界中的隐私。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advocacy Before the Eleventh Circuit: A Clerk's Perspective The Virtues of Thinking Small A Touchy Subject: The Eleventh Circuit's Tug-of-War Over What Constitutes Violent 'Physical Force' Industrial Cyber Vulnerabilities: Lessons from Stuxnet and the Internet of Things Habeas as Forum Allocation: A New Synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1