Population Prevalence of First-Degree Family History of Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the United States: Implications for Genetic Testing§

I. Hall, Andrea Middlebrooks, S. Coughlin
{"title":"Population Prevalence of First-Degree Family History of Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the United States: Implications for Genetic Testing§","authors":"I. Hall, Andrea Middlebrooks, S. Coughlin","doi":"10.2174/1874924000801010034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends that women whose family his- tory is associated with an increased risk for deleterious mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes be referred for genetic counseling and evaluation. Methods: Using data from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey, we examined the percentage of respondents in the U.S. population who report specific first-degree family history patterns and the percentage who reported they had received testing services. Results: Overall, less than 1% of the general population (about 1.4 million persons) reported a family history of breast and ovarian cancers that would be appropriate for referral for genetic counseling and possible genetic testing for cancer sus- ceptibility. Males comprised 40% of those with a positive specified family history. The number of persons who reported having had a genetic test for breast or ovarian cancer susceptibility was very small. Conclusion: Very few of those eligible for testing actually report having been tested for breast or ovarian cancer suscepti- bility. Healthcare providers need opportunities to improve knowledge of genetics concepts and clear guidelines on the use of genetic cancer susceptibility tests.","PeriodicalId":88329,"journal":{"name":"The open health services and policy journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"34-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open health services and policy journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874924000801010034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends that women whose family his- tory is associated with an increased risk for deleterious mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes be referred for genetic counseling and evaluation. Methods: Using data from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey, we examined the percentage of respondents in the U.S. population who report specific first-degree family history patterns and the percentage who reported they had received testing services. Results: Overall, less than 1% of the general population (about 1.4 million persons) reported a family history of breast and ovarian cancers that would be appropriate for referral for genetic counseling and possible genetic testing for cancer sus- ceptibility. Males comprised 40% of those with a positive specified family history. The number of persons who reported having had a genetic test for breast or ovarian cancer susceptibility was very small. Conclusion: Very few of those eligible for testing actually report having been tested for breast or ovarian cancer suscepti- bility. Healthcare providers need opportunities to improve knowledge of genetics concepts and clear guidelines on the use of genetic cancer susceptibility tests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国乳腺癌和卵巢癌一级家族史的人群患病率:基因检测的意义
背景:美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)建议家族史与BRCA1或BRCA2基因有害突变风险增加相关的妇女应进行遗传咨询和评估。方法:使用2005年全国健康访谈调查的数据,我们检查了美国人口中报告特定一级家族史模式的受访者的百分比以及报告他们接受过检测服务的百分比。结果:总体而言,不到1%的普通人群(约140万人)报告有乳腺癌和卵巢癌家族史,适合转诊进行遗传咨询和可能的癌症易感性基因检测。在特定家族史呈阳性的患者中,男性占40%。报告进行乳腺癌或卵巢癌易感性基因检测的人数非常少。结论:很少有符合检测条件的人报告说他们确实做过乳腺癌或卵巢癌易感性检测。医疗保健提供者需要有机会提高对遗传学概念的认识,并就使用遗传癌症易感性测试制定明确的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-traumatic stress disorder and the care of persons living with HIV/AIDS How do Vested Interests Maintain Outdated Policy? The Case of Food Marketing to New Zealand Children How Healthcare Studies Use Claims Data Patient Centered Care - A Conceptual Model and Review of the State of the Art Erosion in the Healthcare Safety Net: Impacts on Different Population Groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1