The Potential of Regional Trade Agreements for Extending Social Protection in Health: Lessons Learned and Emerging Challenges

J. Holst
{"title":"The Potential of Regional Trade Agreements for Extending Social Protection in Health: Lessons Learned and Emerging Challenges","authors":"J. Holst","doi":"10.2174/1874924000902010084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globalisation induces nation states to build marketplaces that span various countries with the objective of facilitating trade and improving economic competitiveness. International experiences gained from three common markets, the European Union (EU), North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and Common Southern Market (MERCOSUR) allow for drawing some general conclusions that might be helpful for guiding similar processes in other regions and preparing them better for the challenges of human and social rights in open economies. Analysis of existing trade agreements shows that even relevant differences in design, structure, financing, coverage and regulation of health systems in member states do not necessarily prevent them from implementing common block-wide social protection and health service arrangements. Public health activities, epidemiologic surveillance and disease prevention have the potential of being starting points for shared activities of member states in the health field. Bi- or multi-national enterprises are eligible to become focal points of cross-border arrangements and regulations, especially if they are public or publicly administered. In general, coordination and cooperation between countries can be tried out or applied first in border regions where there is a high flow of goods, services and persons. When it comes to implementing the social dimension in the policy and priority setting of trade agreements, motivating spirit, driving forces and the concordance of value-sets in member states are crucial conditions. National governments planning to set up or join regional trade agreements have a broad decision margin regarding the extent to which they include social and human rights in regional trade arrangements. International organisations that are promoting regional economic blocks such as the World Bank, the World Trade Organisation and others should inspire political and economic decision-makers to consider health and social protection as crucial points for international trade. There is a broad array of political options between either strengthening the social dimension of common markets or dissolving the existing regional cohesion in favour of entering strictly market-driven blocks.","PeriodicalId":88329,"journal":{"name":"The open health services and policy journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"84-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open health services and policy journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874924000902010084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Globalisation induces nation states to build marketplaces that span various countries with the objective of facilitating trade and improving economic competitiveness. International experiences gained from three common markets, the European Union (EU), North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and Common Southern Market (MERCOSUR) allow for drawing some general conclusions that might be helpful for guiding similar processes in other regions and preparing them better for the challenges of human and social rights in open economies. Analysis of existing trade agreements shows that even relevant differences in design, structure, financing, coverage and regulation of health systems in member states do not necessarily prevent them from implementing common block-wide social protection and health service arrangements. Public health activities, epidemiologic surveillance and disease prevention have the potential of being starting points for shared activities of member states in the health field. Bi- or multi-national enterprises are eligible to become focal points of cross-border arrangements and regulations, especially if they are public or publicly administered. In general, coordination and cooperation between countries can be tried out or applied first in border regions where there is a high flow of goods, services and persons. When it comes to implementing the social dimension in the policy and priority setting of trade agreements, motivating spirit, driving forces and the concordance of value-sets in member states are crucial conditions. National governments planning to set up or join regional trade agreements have a broad decision margin regarding the extent to which they include social and human rights in regional trade arrangements. International organisations that are promoting regional economic blocks such as the World Bank, the World Trade Organisation and others should inspire political and economic decision-makers to consider health and social protection as crucial points for international trade. There is a broad array of political options between either strengthening the social dimension of common markets or dissolving the existing regional cohesion in favour of entering strictly market-driven blocks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区域贸易协定扩大卫生领域社会保护的潜力:经验教训和新出现的挑战
全球化促使民族国家建立跨越不同国家的市场,目的是促进贸易和提高经济竞争力。从欧洲联盟(欧盟)、北美自由贸易协定(北美自由贸易协定)和南方共同市场(南方共同市场)这三个共同市场取得的国际经验可以得出一些一般性的结论,这些结论可能有助于指导其他区域的类似进程,并使它们更好地应对开放经济中人权和社会权利的挑战。对现有贸易协定的分析表明,即使成员国在卫生系统的设计、结构、融资、覆盖和监管方面存在相关差异,也不一定妨碍它们在整个集团范围内实施共同的社会保护和卫生服务安排。公共卫生活动、流行病学监测和疾病预防有可能成为会员国在卫生领域共同活动的起点。跨国或跨国企业有资格成为跨境安排和法规的焦点,特别是如果它们是公共或公共管理的企业。一般来说,国家间的协调与合作可以在货物、服务和人员流动大的边境地区试行或首先应用。在贸易协定的政策和优先事项设定中落实社会维度,激励精神、驱动力和成员国价值观的一致性是至关重要的条件。计划建立或加入区域贸易协定的国家政府在将社会和人权纳入区域贸易安排的程度上有很大的决策余地。世界银行(World Bank)、世界贸易组织(wto)等正在推动区域经济集团的国际组织,应该激励政治和经济决策者将健康和社会保护视为国际贸易的关键点。在要么加强共同市场的社会层面,要么解散现有的区域凝聚力,转而加入严格由市场驱动的集团之间,存在着一系列广泛的政治选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-traumatic stress disorder and the care of persons living with HIV/AIDS How do Vested Interests Maintain Outdated Policy? The Case of Food Marketing to New Zealand Children How Healthcare Studies Use Claims Data Patient Centered Care - A Conceptual Model and Review of the State of the Art Erosion in the Healthcare Safety Net: Impacts on Different Population Groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1