Dual Tasking Under Compromised Visual and Somatosensory Input in Elderly Fallers and Non-Fallers

J. Swanenburg, E. D. Bruin, S. Hegemann, D. Uebelhart, T. Mulder
{"title":"Dual Tasking Under Compromised Visual and Somatosensory Input in Elderly Fallers and Non-Fallers","authors":"J. Swanenburg, E. D. Bruin, S. Hegemann, D. Uebelhart, T. Mulder","doi":"10.2174/1874943701003010169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Performance of additional tasks disturbs postural control in elderly. It is unknown, however, how \npostural control is affected in elderly fallers and non-fallers in a reduced sensory situation. \n \nObjective: To compare differences between single and dual tasking in three test conditions; (1) no-vision, (2) under \nreduced somatosensory information and (3) with a combination of both conditions. \n \nDesign: An observational cohort study with participants assigned to a 12-month pretest fall assessment and a postural balance assessment. \n \nMethods: Fifteen independently living elderly participated (77.5 ± 7.0 [63-87] years). Falls were pre-assessed with a 1- year monthy “fall calendar”. Postural control was analyzed by means of a force platform. Participants were standing quiet (first task) while counting backwards (second task). A 2-factor (group x condition) ANOVA was performed at p<.05. \n \nDifferences of postural (DTCp) and cognitive dual task costs (DTCc) between test conditions were analyzed (one-way \nANOVA). \n \nResults: The analysis showed significant group (fallers/non-fallers) and condition effects. Post hoc analyses indicated that the postural control variables were significantly different during the concurrent reduced vision and somatosensory information. \n \nDual task costs showed a significant difference between normal (N) and the combined condition (NV+RP) in non-fallers. \n \nConclusion: The combination of reduced visual and somatosensory information causes a larger disturbance of postural stability compared with the reduction of visual or somatosensory information alone. Non-fallers seem to have no threats to the postural control stability in this combined reduced sensory situation. They reduce their postural control, which leaves them enough resources to compensate for the reduced sensory information.","PeriodicalId":90985,"journal":{"name":"The open rehabilitation journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"169-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open rehabilitation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874943701003010169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Performance of additional tasks disturbs postural control in elderly. It is unknown, however, how postural control is affected in elderly fallers and non-fallers in a reduced sensory situation. Objective: To compare differences between single and dual tasking in three test conditions; (1) no-vision, (2) under reduced somatosensory information and (3) with a combination of both conditions. Design: An observational cohort study with participants assigned to a 12-month pretest fall assessment and a postural balance assessment. Methods: Fifteen independently living elderly participated (77.5 ± 7.0 [63-87] years). Falls were pre-assessed with a 1- year monthy “fall calendar”. Postural control was analyzed by means of a force platform. Participants were standing quiet (first task) while counting backwards (second task). A 2-factor (group x condition) ANOVA was performed at p<.05. Differences of postural (DTCp) and cognitive dual task costs (DTCc) between test conditions were analyzed (one-way ANOVA). Results: The analysis showed significant group (fallers/non-fallers) and condition effects. Post hoc analyses indicated that the postural control variables were significantly different during the concurrent reduced vision and somatosensory information. Dual task costs showed a significant difference between normal (N) and the combined condition (NV+RP) in non-fallers. Conclusion: The combination of reduced visual and somatosensory information causes a larger disturbance of postural stability compared with the reduction of visual or somatosensory information alone. Non-fallers seem to have no threats to the postural control stability in this combined reduced sensory situation. They reduce their postural control, which leaves them enough resources to compensate for the reduced sensory information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年跌倒者和非跌倒者在视觉和体感输入受损情况下的双重任务
背景:附加任务的执行会干扰老年人的姿势控制。然而,目前尚不清楚的是,在老年跌倒者和非跌倒者的感觉能力下降的情况下,姿势控制是如何受到影响的。目的:比较三种测试条件下单任务与双任务的差异;(1)无视力;(2)体感信息减少;(3)两种情况的结合。设计:一项观察性队列研究,参与者被分配到12个月的测试前跌倒评估和姿势平衡评估。方法:15名独立生活老年人(77.5±7.0[63-87]岁)参与。用1年一个月的“秋季日历”预先评估跌倒情况。利用力平台对姿态控制进行了分析。参与者安静地站着(第一项任务),同时倒数(第二项任务)。双因素(x组)方差分析,p< 0.05。采用单因素方差分析(one-way ANOVA)分析不同测试条件下姿势双任务成本(DTCp)和认知双任务成本(DTCc)的差异。结果:分析显示各组(跌倒者/非跌倒者)及病情效果显著。事后分析表明,在视觉和体感信息同时降低的情况下,体位控制变量存在显著差异。双任务成本在正常(N)和联合条件(NV+RP)之间有显著差异。结论:视觉和体感信息联合减少比单独减少视觉或体感信息对体位稳定性造成更大的干扰。在这种综合感官减少的情况下,不摔倒的人似乎对姿势控制的稳定性没有威胁。他们减少了对姿势的控制,这给他们留下了足够的资源来补偿减少的感觉信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-acceptance of low vision aids (LVADs) among patients presented to eye OPD in Poly Clinic Hospital Islamabad Effects of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder symptoms in adults: A randomized controlled trial Empowering pelvic floor rehabilitation: Unveiling technological innovations in the pelvic floor muscle chair; insights and hurdles in the pakistani context Effects of task-oriented balance training with sensory integration in post stroke patients Cases of spinal cord injury: correlation among resilience, social support and psychological well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1