Perceptions of the Clinical Competence of New Speech-Language Pathology Graduates in New Zealand: A Research Note

Gina D. Tillard, K. Lawson, Shannon Emmerson
{"title":"Perceptions of the Clinical Competence of New Speech-Language Pathology Graduates in New Zealand: A Research Note","authors":"Gina D. Tillard, K. Lawson, Shannon Emmerson","doi":"10.2174/1874943701104010023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study arose as the Course Leader sought feedback on the adequacy of the programme to prepare new graduates for professional practice. Aims: The aim was to examine how well an undergraduate degree programme prepared speech pathology graduates for the workforce, focussing on a range of core competencies including theoretical knowledge, clinical skills and professionalism. Methods & Procedures: Thirty new graduates and 30 employers were approached to participate in the study, with 19 and 16 accepting respectively. A written survey of 15 questions, 11 of which employed a Likert 5-point scale, and four of which were open-ended requiring a short written answer. Of the 11 rateable questions, nine were directed at both graduates and employers and the remaining three were directed at either group. Results were subjected to non-parametric between group comparisons. Open-ended questions were scanned for themes. Outcomes and Results: Employers and graduates did not differ on their perception of new graduate competence across all skill areas except writing skills. The employers rated the new graduates significantly lower on writing skills than did graduates. Both employers and graduates believed they were well-prepared for professional practice. Emerging themes in the open-ended questions were the continuity of location of clinical placements and employment, professional development, professional support, integration of academic and clinical education, and specific topic areas of strengths and weaknesses in the undergraduate curriculum. Conclusions: The study provides insight as to the preparedness of new SLP graduates upon entering the workforce. Considering the views of both the new graduate and employer are vital if university programmes are to address the expanding scope of practice in the field of communication sciences and disorders.","PeriodicalId":90985,"journal":{"name":"The open rehabilitation journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"23-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open rehabilitation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874943701104010023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: This study arose as the Course Leader sought feedback on the adequacy of the programme to prepare new graduates for professional practice. Aims: The aim was to examine how well an undergraduate degree programme prepared speech pathology graduates for the workforce, focussing on a range of core competencies including theoretical knowledge, clinical skills and professionalism. Methods & Procedures: Thirty new graduates and 30 employers were approached to participate in the study, with 19 and 16 accepting respectively. A written survey of 15 questions, 11 of which employed a Likert 5-point scale, and four of which were open-ended requiring a short written answer. Of the 11 rateable questions, nine were directed at both graduates and employers and the remaining three were directed at either group. Results were subjected to non-parametric between group comparisons. Open-ended questions were scanned for themes. Outcomes and Results: Employers and graduates did not differ on their perception of new graduate competence across all skill areas except writing skills. The employers rated the new graduates significantly lower on writing skills than did graduates. Both employers and graduates believed they were well-prepared for professional practice. Emerging themes in the open-ended questions were the continuity of location of clinical placements and employment, professional development, professional support, integration of academic and clinical education, and specific topic areas of strengths and weaknesses in the undergraduate curriculum. Conclusions: The study provides insight as to the preparedness of new SLP graduates upon entering the workforce. Considering the views of both the new graduate and employer are vital if university programmes are to address the expanding scope of practice in the field of communication sciences and disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰新言语语言病理学毕业生临床能力的感知:一项研究记录
背景:这项研究是在课程负责人就该课程是否足以为新毕业生的专业实践做准备征求反馈意见时产生的。目的:目的是考察本科学位课程如何为言语病理学毕业生做好就业准备,重点关注一系列核心能力,包括理论知识、临床技能和专业精神。方法与步骤:30名应届毕业生和30名雇主参与研究,分别有19名和16名接受调查。一份包含15个问题的书面调查,其中11个问题采用李克特5分制,其中4个是开放式的,需要简短的书面回答。在11个可评税的问题中,有9个问题是针对毕业生和雇主的,其余3个问题是针对任何一个群体的。结果采用组间非参数比较。扫描开放式问题的主题。结果和结果:雇主和毕业生对新毕业生在除写作技能外的所有技能领域的能力的看法没有差异。雇主对应届毕业生写作技巧的评价明显低于应届毕业生。雇主和毕业生都认为他们已经为专业实践做好了充分的准备。开放式问题中的新主题是临床实习和就业地点的连续性,专业发展,专业支持,学术和临床教育的整合,以及本科课程中优势和劣势的具体主题领域。结论:该研究提供了洞察力的准备新的SLP毕业生进入劳动力市场。如果大学课程要解决传播科学和疾病领域不断扩大的实践范围,考虑新毕业生和雇主的观点是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-acceptance of low vision aids (LVADs) among patients presented to eye OPD in Poly Clinic Hospital Islamabad Effects of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder symptoms in adults: A randomized controlled trial Empowering pelvic floor rehabilitation: Unveiling technological innovations in the pelvic floor muscle chair; insights and hurdles in the pakistani context Effects of task-oriented balance training with sensory integration in post stroke patients Cases of spinal cord injury: correlation among resilience, social support and psychological well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1