The Posterity Project: Developing a Method for Long-Term Political Reform

E. Foley
{"title":"The Posterity Project: Developing a Method for Long-Term Political Reform","authors":"E. Foley","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2326423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Akhil Amar, at the end of AMERICA'S UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTION (2012), mentions the idea of postponing for a long while the date on which newly adopted constitutional reforms become effective. The rationale for this idea, as Amar explains, is to impose a Rawlsian \"veil of ignorance\" on the adopters of the constitutional reforms, so that they have less ability to act strategically on behalf of their own descendants. This essay develops how Amar's idea might best be operationalized. In doing so, it proposes the creation of a nonpartisan Posterity College, with each state sending the same number of members as the state has in the Electoral College. The nation's two immediate past presidents from different political parties (now Clinton and Bush) would serve as the bipartisan co-chairs of this Posterity College. The essay discusses the procedures that this Posterity College would use for its deliberations, how its members would be appointed, some of the potential reforms it might consider, and how its proposals would become part of the Constitution but taking effect only long afterwards.","PeriodicalId":82221,"journal":{"name":"Oklahoma law review","volume":"66 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oklahoma law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2326423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Akhil Amar, at the end of AMERICA'S UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTION (2012), mentions the idea of postponing for a long while the date on which newly adopted constitutional reforms become effective. The rationale for this idea, as Amar explains, is to impose a Rawlsian "veil of ignorance" on the adopters of the constitutional reforms, so that they have less ability to act strategically on behalf of their own descendants. This essay develops how Amar's idea might best be operationalized. In doing so, it proposes the creation of a nonpartisan Posterity College, with each state sending the same number of members as the state has in the Electoral College. The nation's two immediate past presidents from different political parties (now Clinton and Bush) would serve as the bipartisan co-chairs of this Posterity College. The essay discusses the procedures that this Posterity College would use for its deliberations, how its members would be appointed, some of the potential reforms it might consider, and how its proposals would become part of the Constitution but taking effect only long afterwards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后人工程:发展一种长期政治改革的方法
阿希尔·阿马尔在《美国不成文宪法》(2012)的末尾提到,要将新通过的宪法改革生效的日期推迟很长一段时间。正如阿马尔解释的那样,这种想法的基本原理是在宪法改革的采纳者身上强加罗尔斯式的“无知之幕”,这样他们就没有能力代表自己的后代采取战略行动。这篇文章阐述了如何最好地实现阿玛尔的想法。为此,它建议建立一个无党派的后代学院,每个州派出的成员数量与该州在选举团中的人数相同。来自不同政党的两位刚刚卸任的美国总统(现在的克林顿和布什)将担任这个后代学院的两党联合主席。这篇文章讨论了这个后人学院将用于其审议的程序,如何任命其成员,它可能考虑的一些潜在改革,以及它的建议如何成为宪法的一部分,但在很久之后才生效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EMPLOYEES WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: NEW DIRECTIONS FOR DISABILITY ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW? Creative Processes Setting the Stage The Commenting Power: Agency Accountability through Public Participation List of Illustrations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1