Dificultades y barreras encontradas por los profesionales sanitarios en la atención de pacientes paliativos en un distrito sanitario.

Q3 Nursing Medicina Paliativa Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.20986/MEDPAL.2021.1196/2020
S. V. Serrano, M. Ojeda, S. Alonso, Juan Ramón Lacalle Remigio
{"title":"Dificultades y barreras encontradas por los profesionales sanitarios en la atención de pacientes paliativos en un distrito sanitario.","authors":"S. V. Serrano, M. Ojeda, S. Alonso, Juan Ramón Lacalle Remigio","doi":"10.20986/MEDPAL.2021.1196/2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To know the difficulties and barriers found by health professionals for assistance to people in palliative care, in a health district. Design: Cross-sectional descriptive observational design. Location: Regional hospital and primary care centers of a health district. Participants: 118 health professionals from these centers: Internists, emergency physicians and family doctors; as well as nurses from the same healthcare areas. Main measurements: sociodemographic and professional variables were collected on the training and experience in palliative care through a survey, as well as the items of the Scale of Difficulties in Palliative Care (PCDS). Results: A total of 118 professionals were included, with an average age of 42.2 years, 57.6% being women. Palliative care limited training and the difficulty of accessing information at home were the greatest barriers found by the professionals, with a range observed between 2.27 and 3.26. No statistically significant differences are found when studying the perceived difficulties according to the professional category. In the comparison of care settings, there are differences (p=0.03), with greater difficulties being detected in the emergency department, with the emergency physician having the greatest difficulty compared to the internist (p<0.01). Among the nurses of the three care areas, no differences are identified. Conclusions: Emergency physicians and nurses were the professionals who experienced the greatest difficulties in providing palliative care in their care practice, while the internists were the ones who described the least difficulties.","PeriodicalId":49831,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Paliativa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Paliativa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20986/MEDPAL.2021.1196/2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To know the difficulties and barriers found by health professionals for assistance to people in palliative care, in a health district. Design: Cross-sectional descriptive observational design. Location: Regional hospital and primary care centers of a health district. Participants: 118 health professionals from these centers: Internists, emergency physicians and family doctors; as well as nurses from the same healthcare areas. Main measurements: sociodemographic and professional variables were collected on the training and experience in palliative care through a survey, as well as the items of the Scale of Difficulties in Palliative Care (PCDS). Results: A total of 118 professionals were included, with an average age of 42.2 years, 57.6% being women. Palliative care limited training and the difficulty of accessing information at home were the greatest barriers found by the professionals, with a range observed between 2.27 and 3.26. No statistically significant differences are found when studying the perceived difficulties according to the professional category. In the comparison of care settings, there are differences (p=0.03), with greater difficulties being detected in the emergency department, with the emergency physician having the greatest difficulty compared to the internist (p<0.01). Among the nurses of the three care areas, no differences are identified. Conclusions: Emergency physicians and nurses were the professionals who experienced the greatest difficulties in providing palliative care in their care practice, while the internists were the ones who described the least difficulties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生专业人员在卫生区姑息治疗患者护理中遇到的困难和障碍。
目的:了解某卫生区卫生专业人员在协助姑息治疗患者时遇到的困难和障碍。设计:横断面描述性观察性设计。地点:区域医院和卫生区的初级保健中心。参与者:来自这些中心的118名保健专业人员:内科医生、急诊医生和家庭医生;还有来自同一医疗区域的护士。主要测量方法:通过调查收集姑息治疗培训和经验的社会人口学和专业变量,以及姑息治疗困难量表(PCDS)的项目。结果:共纳入118名专业人员,平均年龄42.2岁,女性占57.6%。专业人员认为,姑息治疗培训有限和在家获取信息困难是最大的障碍,其范围在2.27至3.26之间。在对不同专业类别的感知困难进行研究时,没有发现统计学上的显著差异。在护理环境的比较中,存在差异(p=0.03),急诊科发现的困难更大,急诊科医生比内科医生遇到的困难最大(p<0.01)。在三个护理区的护士中,没有发现差异。结论:急诊医生和护士是在提供姑息治疗方面遇到最大困难的专业人员,而内科医生是在提供姑息治疗方面遇到最少困难的专业人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina Paliativa
Medicina Paliativa HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicina Paliativa, publicada desde 1994, es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Cuidados Paliativos (SECPAL). Medicina Paliativa es una revista trimestral de revisión por pares y sirve a un público interdisciplinario de profesionales, proporcionando un foro para la publicación de manuscritos en español de todas las disciplinas asociadas a los cuidados paliativos y en especial los de carácter multidisciplinar.
期刊最新文献
Conocimiento de los estudiantes de medicina sobre los cuidados paliativos Revisión sistemática sobre beneficios de psicodélicos en pacientes al final de la vida con malestar emocional. Necesidad de cuidados paliativos y estimación pronóstica de vida en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica avanzada. Uso de opioides en pacientes con enfermedad crónica avanzada en situación de últimos días. Prevalencia del estreñimiento en una población de pacientes oncológicos, en seguimiento por el equipo de cuidados paliativos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1