求助PDF
{"title":"Tanatología y afrontamiento del personal de salud ante la muerte en la pandemia COVID-19","authors":"M. D. L. L. Casas Martínez, Ignacio Mora Magaña","doi":"10.20986/medpal.2021.1257/2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the coping level of health personnel with death after having received or not training in palliative care. Method: A cross-sectional survey study. Application of the Bugen Scale as validated for Mexico, in a Likert-scale format, in a sample of 394 health staffers;one participant was excluded for not signing a letter of consent. The survey was addressed to health personnel in the public and private sectors, who were currently practicing medicine and who agreed to answer the survey. A Mann-Whitney U-test was performed to compare responses to the scale. Result: Significance was found in the Bugen scale in favor of those who took a thanatology course. The Mann Whitney U-test between those who took a thanatology course and those who did not clearly favored those who took a thanatology course in all responses. Comparison using the Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there were differences in the responses as compared according to the following categories: sex (p = 0.002), religion (p = 0.023), and adulthood (≥ 50 years vs < 50 years) (p = 0.000) The comparisons by marital status and professional field showed no differences when contrasted. Conclusions: Based on the results presented, we consider that the training of health personnel in the thanatological field should be considered both curricularly and extracurricularly, since it constitutes a tool for personal reflection that positively influences own attitudes, communication and the physician-patient relationship. © 2021 Sociedad Espanola de Cuidados Paliativos. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":49831,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Paliativa","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Paliativa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20986/medpal.2021.1257/2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
COVID-19大流行期间卫生人员死亡前的死亡学和应对
目的:了解接受过或未接受过姑息治疗培训的医务人员对死亡的应对水平。方法:横断面调查研究。在394名卫生工作人员的样本中,以李克特量表形式在墨西哥验证了Bugen量表的应用;一名参与者因未签署同意书而被排除在外。调查对象是目前正在行医并同意回答调查的公共和私营部门的卫生人员。采用Mann-Whitney u检验比较对量表的反应。结果:Bugen量表对参加过死亡学课程的学生有显著的优势。曼·惠特尼u型检验在上过死亡学课程的人和没上过的人之间进行对比在所有的回答中都明显倾向于上过死亡学课程的人。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较,按性别(p = 0.002)、宗教(p = 0.023)、成年(≥50岁vs < 50岁)(p = 0.000)进行比较,差异有统计学意义。按婚姻状况和专业领域进行比较,差异无统计学意义。结论:基于所提出的结果,我们认为,在死亡领域的卫生人员的培训应考虑课程和课外,因为它构成了一个工具的个人反思,积极影响自己的态度,沟通和医患关系。©2021 Espanola de Cuidados palativos。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。