Endoscopic-assisted approach in the treatment of subcondylar fractures: our experience.

M. P. Pampín Martínez, J. L. del Castillo Pardo de Vera, I. Aragón Niño, J. P. Rodríguez Arias, J. L. Cebrián Carretero
{"title":"Endoscopic-assisted approach in the treatment of subcondylar fractures: our experience.","authors":"M. P. Pampín Martínez, J. L. del Castillo Pardo de Vera, I. Aragón Niño, J. P. Rodríguez Arias, J. L. Cebrián Carretero","doi":"10.20986/recom.2022.1225/2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The management of subcondylar fractures has been very controversial in the maxillofacial literature. The open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) technique has been considered by many authors the gold standard in selected cases. However, with the rise in endoscopic techniques in the craniomaxillofacial area, new boundaries and less invasive techniques are being explored. The endoscopic approach of subcondylar fractures has proved overall good and similar results to open approaches whilst reducing complications such as facial nerve injury. In this article we purpose to describe our experience with the endoscopic approach to subcondylar fractures. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 11 patients with subcondylar fractures treated at our department via an endoscopic approach. The number and type of plates used in each patient is recorded. Results and complications observed for all patients are described as well as functional outcomes in terms of mouth opening at 1 week, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. Results: One patient presented with transient damage to the marginal and frontal branches of the facial nerve. 18.2 % of patients had their hardware removed due to pain or infection at the fracture site. No cases of salivary fistula or sialocele were found in this study. Mean mouth opening at one week postoperatively was 31.8 mm which increased to 37.8 mm at 6 months after surgery, meaning an increase of 18.86 % through the follow-up. Also, 18.2 % of patients presented with persistent deviation with mouth opening and one patient presented with postoperative persistent malocclusion that was treated with intermaxillary fixation and elastics. Conclusion: The endoscopic management of subcondylar fractures is a safe alternative to the open approach, specially in favorable cases, which reduces the risk of complications associa ted to open approaches, such as unfavorable scarring, salivary gland complications and facial nerve damage. In our series only one patient presented with transient damage to the facial nerve. 18.2 % of the plates were removed, which is a high percentage and should be evaluated, although the small size of the series should be taken into account. Maxillofacial surgeons should be encouraged to learn and trained in endoscopic techniques and include the endoscopic assisted approach in their surgical armamentarium.","PeriodicalId":35298,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Oral y Maxilofacial","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Oral y Maxilofacial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20986/recom.2022.1225/2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The management of subcondylar fractures has been very controversial in the maxillofacial literature. The open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) technique has been considered by many authors the gold standard in selected cases. However, with the rise in endoscopic techniques in the craniomaxillofacial area, new boundaries and less invasive techniques are being explored. The endoscopic approach of subcondylar fractures has proved overall good and similar results to open approaches whilst reducing complications such as facial nerve injury. In this article we purpose to describe our experience with the endoscopic approach to subcondylar fractures. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 11 patients with subcondylar fractures treated at our department via an endoscopic approach. The number and type of plates used in each patient is recorded. Results and complications observed for all patients are described as well as functional outcomes in terms of mouth opening at 1 week, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. Results: One patient presented with transient damage to the marginal and frontal branches of the facial nerve. 18.2 % of patients had their hardware removed due to pain or infection at the fracture site. No cases of salivary fistula or sialocele were found in this study. Mean mouth opening at one week postoperatively was 31.8 mm which increased to 37.8 mm at 6 months after surgery, meaning an increase of 18.86 % through the follow-up. Also, 18.2 % of patients presented with persistent deviation with mouth opening and one patient presented with postoperative persistent malocclusion that was treated with intermaxillary fixation and elastics. Conclusion: The endoscopic management of subcondylar fractures is a safe alternative to the open approach, specially in favorable cases, which reduces the risk of complications associa ted to open approaches, such as unfavorable scarring, salivary gland complications and facial nerve damage. In our series only one patient presented with transient damage to the facial nerve. 18.2 % of the plates were removed, which is a high percentage and should be evaluated, although the small size of the series should be taken into account. Maxillofacial surgeons should be encouraged to learn and trained in endoscopic techniques and include the endoscopic assisted approach in their surgical armamentarium.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内窥镜辅助入路治疗髁下骨折:我们的经验。
在颌面文献中,髁下骨折的治疗一直存在很大争议。切开复位内固定(ORIF)技术被许多作者认为是特定病例的金标准。然而,随着内窥镜技术在颅颌面区域的兴起,新的边界和微创技术正在被探索。经证实,髁下骨折的内镜入路总体上良好,效果与开放入路相似,同时减少了面神经损伤等并发症。在这篇文章中,我们的目的是描述我们的经验,内窥镜入路治疗髁下骨折。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了11例经内镜入路治疗的髁下骨折患者。记录每位患者使用的钢板数量和类型。本文描述了所有患者的结果和并发症,以及术后1周、3个月和6个月的功能结果。结果:1例患者表现为面神经边缘和额支暂时性损伤。18.2%的患者因骨折部位疼痛或感染摘除了内固定物。本研究未发现涎瘘或涎腺囊肿病例。术后1周平均开口31.8 mm,术后6个月增加到37.8 mm,随访增加18.86%。此外,18.2%的患者出现持续的开口偏差,1例患者出现术后持续的错颌畸形,采用上颌间固定和弹性治疗。结论:髁下骨折的内镜治疗相对于开放入路是一种安全的选择,特别是在有利的病例中,可以减少开放入路相关并发症的风险,如不良疤痕、唾液腺并发症和面神经损伤。在我们的研究中,只有一名患者表现出短暂的面神经损伤。18.2%的板被移除,这是一个很高的百分比,应该进行评估,尽管应该考虑到该系列的小尺寸。应鼓励颌面外科医生学习和培训内窥镜技术,并将内窥镜辅助入路纳入其手术装备中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: La Revista Española de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial editada por Ergon es una publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial (SECOM) Entre los objetivos de la revista se encuentran la difusión científica de la especialidad de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial y servir de medio de publicación para todos los miembros de la SECOM así como especialistas afines. Las áreas de interés de la revista son la científica, investigadora, informativa de eventos, becas, premios y revisiones bibliográficas.
期刊最新文献
Perfil epidemiológico de pacientes con fractura mandibular tratadas quirúrgicamente en el Hospital Gustavo Fricke, Chile, entre los años 2014 y 2020 Fascitis nodular en región maxilofacial, un caso clinico Anatomorphological variations of the temporomandibular joint after orthognathic surgery: A descriptive study. Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para evaluar el nivel de conocimientos y hábitos de prescripción antibiótica en cirugía oral. Radioterapia y riesgo de supervivencia en implantes dentales: Resumen de revisiones sistemáticas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1