Does Unopposed Peri-menopausal or Post-menopausal Estrogen Protect against Breast Cancer? A Systematic Review

Onwude Joseph Loze
{"title":"Does Unopposed Peri-menopausal or Post-menopausal Estrogen Protect against Breast Cancer? A Systematic Review","authors":"Onwude Joseph Loze","doi":"10.17352/2455-2968.000142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, breast cancer is the most common incident cancer and cause of cancer deaths in women. The incidence of breast cancer suddenly increases from age 40 and continues to increase until age 84 years. These coincide with perimenopause and menopause periods. Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) is recognized to cause breast cancer. This causal association has become assumed with unopposed Estrogen Replacement Therapy (ERT) which is used for women who require HRT but do not require the Progestogen component. This systematic review assessed the evidence behind the belief that unopposed ERT had a causal relationship with breast cancer. Established databases were searched to August 2017 for publications that examined the relationship between unopposed ERT and breast cancer in cohort studies (prospective and retrospective), case control studies and randomized controlled studies. Unopposed ERT could be oral, transdermal patch or gel, subcutaneous or intranasal routes. All the studies were systematically assessed for the risk of bias and the measures of effect such as appropriate measures of effect [relative risk for randomized controlled studies, incidence ratio/rate for prospective cohort studies and odds ratio for retrospective cohort studies and case control studies. The quality of the evidence was assessed with GRADE methods [1]. We report on the general direction of the evidence from different types of studies over different decades in different countries using different types of unopposed Estrogens at different doses, to show whether the evidence is consistent in its direction that unopposed Estrogens do not increase the risk of Breast cancer in perimenopausal or post-menopausal women. The evidence does not support that unopposed ERT increases the risk of breast cancer. Where an association has been reported, there was methodological association because the study was either a retrospective study as case control study or cohort study which are not study designs that are valid to show cause and effect relationships. Moreover the only randomized studies in the short term and long term show no cause and effect relationship. The implication is that as unopposed ERT does not increase the risk of breast cancer, more women can consider its use and benefi ts.","PeriodicalId":93785,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgery and surgical research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgery and surgical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-2968.000142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Globally, breast cancer is the most common incident cancer and cause of cancer deaths in women. The incidence of breast cancer suddenly increases from age 40 and continues to increase until age 84 years. These coincide with perimenopause and menopause periods. Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) is recognized to cause breast cancer. This causal association has become assumed with unopposed Estrogen Replacement Therapy (ERT) which is used for women who require HRT but do not require the Progestogen component. This systematic review assessed the evidence behind the belief that unopposed ERT had a causal relationship with breast cancer. Established databases were searched to August 2017 for publications that examined the relationship between unopposed ERT and breast cancer in cohort studies (prospective and retrospective), case control studies and randomized controlled studies. Unopposed ERT could be oral, transdermal patch or gel, subcutaneous or intranasal routes. All the studies were systematically assessed for the risk of bias and the measures of effect such as appropriate measures of effect [relative risk for randomized controlled studies, incidence ratio/rate for prospective cohort studies and odds ratio for retrospective cohort studies and case control studies. The quality of the evidence was assessed with GRADE methods [1]. We report on the general direction of the evidence from different types of studies over different decades in different countries using different types of unopposed Estrogens at different doses, to show whether the evidence is consistent in its direction that unopposed Estrogens do not increase the risk of Breast cancer in perimenopausal or post-menopausal women. The evidence does not support that unopposed ERT increases the risk of breast cancer. Where an association has been reported, there was methodological association because the study was either a retrospective study as case control study or cohort study which are not study designs that are valid to show cause and effect relationships. Moreover the only randomized studies in the short term and long term show no cause and effect relationship. The implication is that as unopposed ERT does not increase the risk of breast cancer, more women can consider its use and benefi ts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未对抗的围绝经期或绝经后雌激素能预防乳腺癌吗?系统回顾
在全球范围内,乳腺癌是最常见的癌症,也是导致妇女癌症死亡的原因。乳腺癌的发病率从40岁开始突然增加,一直持续到84岁。这些与围绝经期和停经期相吻合。激素替代疗法(HRT)被认为会导致乳腺癌。这种因果关系已被认为与无对抗雌激素替代疗法(ERT)有关,该疗法用于需要HRT但不需要孕激素成分的妇女。该系统综述评估了无对抗性ERT与乳腺癌有因果关系这一信念背后的证据。在已建立的数据库中检索到2017年8月之前的出版物,这些出版物在队列研究(前瞻性和回顾性)、病例对照研究和随机对照研究中研究了未对抗ERT与乳腺癌之间的关系。无对抗ERT可以是口服,透皮贴片或凝胶,皮下或鼻内途径。所有研究均被系统地评估偏倚风险和效果指标,如适当的效果指标[随机对照研究的相对风险,前瞻性队列研究的发病率/发生率,回顾性队列研究和病例对照研究的优势比]。证据质量用GRADE方法评估[1]。我们报告了来自不同国家、不同年代、不同剂量、不同类型的无对抗性雌激素的不同类型研究的证据的总体方向,以表明无对抗性雌激素不会增加围绝经期或绝经后妇女患乳腺癌的风险这一证据方向是否一致。没有证据支持未对抗的ERT会增加患乳腺癌的风险。当关联被报道时,就会有方法学上的关联因为研究要么是回顾性研究作为病例对照研究要么是队列研究这些研究设计不能有效地显示因果关系。此外,仅有的短期和长期随机研究显示没有因果关系。这意味着,由于非对抗性ERT不会增加患乳腺癌的风险,更多的女性可以考虑使用它及其益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effects of anesthesia on cancer progression and anti-tumor immunity. A review Chronic hypertension in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair surgery. Multivariate analysis Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) presenting as acute abdomen: Image in surgery A rare occurrence: A case report of acute appendicitis and omental infarction unveiled by epigastric pain in a heavy smoker A case report of tubular apocrine adenoma of lower eyelid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1