Financial burden of seeking diabetes mellitus care in India: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Sample Survey

Mehak Nanda, Rajesh Sharma
{"title":"Financial burden of seeking diabetes mellitus care in India: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Sample Survey","authors":"Mehak Nanda,&nbsp;Rajesh Sharma","doi":"10.1002/hcs2.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major public health concern in India, and entails a severe burden in terms of disability, death, and economic cost. This study examined the out-of-pocket health expenditure (OOPE) and financial burden associated with DM care in India.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study used data from the latest round of the National Sample Survey on health, which covered 555,115 individuals from 113,823 households in India. In the present study, data of 1216 individuals who sought inpatient treatment and 6527 individuals who sought outpatient care for DM were analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In India, 10.04 per 1000 persons reported having DM during the last 15 days before the survey date, varying from 6.94/1000 in rural areas to 17.45/1000 in urban areas. Nearly 38% of Indian households with diabetic members experienced catastrophic health expenditure (at the 10% threshold) and approximately 10% of DM-affected households were pushed below the poverty line because of OOPE, irrespective of the type of care sought. 48.5% of households used distressed sources to finance the inpatient costs of DM. Medicines constituted one of the largest proportion of total health expenditure, regardless of the type of care sought or type of healthcare facility visited. The average monthly OOPE was over 4.5-fold and 2.5-fold higher for households who sought inpatient and outpatient care, respectively, from private health facilities, compared with those treated at public facilities. Notably, the financial burden was more severe for households residing in rural areas, those in lower economic quintiles, those belonging to marginalised social groups, and those using private health facilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The burden of DM and its associated financial ramifications necessitate policy measures, such as prioritising health promotion and disease prevention strategies, strengthening public healthcare facilities, improved regulation of private healthcare providers, and bringing outpatient services under the purview of health insurance, to manage the diabetes epidemic and mitigate its financial impact.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100601,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Science","volume":"2 5","pages":"291-305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hcs2.65","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hcs2.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major public health concern in India, and entails a severe burden in terms of disability, death, and economic cost. This study examined the out-of-pocket health expenditure (OOPE) and financial burden associated with DM care in India.

Methods

The study used data from the latest round of the National Sample Survey on health, which covered 555,115 individuals from 113,823 households in India. In the present study, data of 1216 individuals who sought inpatient treatment and 6527 individuals who sought outpatient care for DM were analysed.

Results

In India, 10.04 per 1000 persons reported having DM during the last 15 days before the survey date, varying from 6.94/1000 in rural areas to 17.45/1000 in urban areas. Nearly 38% of Indian households with diabetic members experienced catastrophic health expenditure (at the 10% threshold) and approximately 10% of DM-affected households were pushed below the poverty line because of OOPE, irrespective of the type of care sought. 48.5% of households used distressed sources to finance the inpatient costs of DM. Medicines constituted one of the largest proportion of total health expenditure, regardless of the type of care sought or type of healthcare facility visited. The average monthly OOPE was over 4.5-fold and 2.5-fold higher for households who sought inpatient and outpatient care, respectively, from private health facilities, compared with those treated at public facilities. Notably, the financial burden was more severe for households residing in rural areas, those in lower economic quintiles, those belonging to marginalised social groups, and those using private health facilities.

Conclusion

The burden of DM and its associated financial ramifications necessitate policy measures, such as prioritising health promotion and disease prevention strategies, strengthening public healthcare facilities, improved regulation of private healthcare providers, and bringing outpatient services under the purview of health insurance, to manage the diabetes epidemic and mitigate its financial impact.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度寻求糖尿病护理的经济负担:来自全国代表性抽样调查的证据
背景糖尿病(DM)是印度一个主要的公共卫生问题,在残疾、死亡和经济成本方面带来了严重的负担。这项研究调查了印度与糖尿病护理相关的自付医疗支出(OOPE)和经济负担。方法该研究使用了最新一轮全国健康抽样调查的数据,该调查覆盖了印度113823个家庭的555115人。在本研究中,分析了1216名寻求住院治疗的患者和6527名寻求DM门诊治疗的患者的数据。结果在印度,在调查日期前的最后15天内,每1000人中有1004人报告患有糖尿病,从农村地区的6.94/1000人到城市地区的17.45/1000人不等。近38%患有糖尿病的印度家庭经历了灾难性的医疗支出(达到10%的阈值),约10%的糖尿病患者家庭因OOPE而被推到贫困线以下,无论寻求何种护理。48.5%的家庭使用不良来源来支付糖尿病的住院费用。无论寻求的护理类型或访问的医疗机构类型如何,药物在总医疗支出中所占比例最大。与在公共医疗机构接受治疗的家庭相比,从私人医疗机构寻求住院和门诊护理的家庭每月平均OOPE分别高出4.5倍和2.5倍以上。值得注意的是,居住在农村地区的家庭、经济五分位数较低的家庭、属于边缘化社会群体的家庭和使用私人卫生设施的家庭的经济负担更为严重。结论糖尿病的负担及其相关的财务影响需要采取政策措施,如优先考虑健康促进和疾病预防战略,加强公共医疗设施,改善对私人医疗服务提供者的监管,并将门诊服务纳入健康保险的范围,管理糖尿病流行并减轻其财务影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study protocol: A national cross-sectional study on psychology and behavior investigation of Chinese residents in 2023. Caregiving in Asia: Priority areas for research, policy, and practice to support family caregivers. Innovative public strategies in response to COVID-19: A review of practices from China. Sixty years of ethical evolution: The 2024 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH). A novel ensemble ARIMA-LSTM approach for evaluating COVID-19 cases and future outbreak preparedness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1