Why volubility can predict the success of cochlear implantation

Paris Binos, Anna Polemikou, E. Loizou
{"title":"Why volubility can predict the success of cochlear implantation","authors":"Paris Binos, Anna Polemikou, E. Loizou","doi":"10.21767/amj.2018.3518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background We sought to identify potential communication markers predicting the success of cochlear implantation, that might be observed within the first year of life. According the last ten years literature review volubility can be considered as a potentially important vocal measure predicting later language development. Aims The present review aims to review existing evidence related with: (i) why volubility posits a plausible marker of cochlear implantation success in infancy, and (ii) presents the clinical usefulness of volubility data in predicting later language trajectory. Methods Rate of vocalization or volubility measured in terms of frequency of syllable production and it is clearly affected by parental interactivity. A low percentage of volubility can be predictive of significant communication impairment. Vocalization growth during the first year of life, as demonstrated in publications examining sound production characteristics of normally hearing (NH) and hearing impaired (HI) infants fitted with CI, were reviewed. Results Literature results revealed differences in linguistic performance among NH and CI infants which are typically attributed to auditory deprivation. Infants received late CI, produce fewer syllables (low volubility) and exhibit lateonset babbling, especially those who underwent the procedure as late as the age of 12 months or thereafter. Early recipients (implanted before the age of 12-months) related with more vocalizations, which is thought to stem from CI-initiated auditory feedback. In sum, total syllables produced (volubility) demonstrate the developmental trajectory of language acquisition which in turn is a crucial factor related with the success of cochlear implantation. Conclusion Contemporary findings collectively endorse volubility as a plausible criterion of differentiation between successful and non-successful early CI. It is argued that volubility measures predict language development and, in doing so, carry vast implications on designing efficient clinical assessment and intervention practices.","PeriodicalId":46823,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Medical Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21767/amj.2018.3518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background We sought to identify potential communication markers predicting the success of cochlear implantation, that might be observed within the first year of life. According the last ten years literature review volubility can be considered as a potentially important vocal measure predicting later language development. Aims The present review aims to review existing evidence related with: (i) why volubility posits a plausible marker of cochlear implantation success in infancy, and (ii) presents the clinical usefulness of volubility data in predicting later language trajectory. Methods Rate of vocalization or volubility measured in terms of frequency of syllable production and it is clearly affected by parental interactivity. A low percentage of volubility can be predictive of significant communication impairment. Vocalization growth during the first year of life, as demonstrated in publications examining sound production characteristics of normally hearing (NH) and hearing impaired (HI) infants fitted with CI, were reviewed. Results Literature results revealed differences in linguistic performance among NH and CI infants which are typically attributed to auditory deprivation. Infants received late CI, produce fewer syllables (low volubility) and exhibit lateonset babbling, especially those who underwent the procedure as late as the age of 12 months or thereafter. Early recipients (implanted before the age of 12-months) related with more vocalizations, which is thought to stem from CI-initiated auditory feedback. In sum, total syllables produced (volubility) demonstrate the developmental trajectory of language acquisition which in turn is a crucial factor related with the success of cochlear implantation. Conclusion Contemporary findings collectively endorse volubility as a plausible criterion of differentiation between successful and non-successful early CI. It is argued that volubility measures predict language development and, in doing so, carry vast implications on designing efficient clinical assessment and intervention practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么容积率可以预测人工耳蜗植入的成功
研究背景:我们试图确定预测人工耳蜗植入成功的潜在交流标记,这些标记可能在出生后一年内观察到。根据近十年的文献综述,口述能力可以被认为是预测后期语言发展的潜在重要的声音测量。本综述的目的是回顾现有的相关证据:(i)为什么说话能力是婴儿人工耳蜗植入成功的一个可信的标志,以及(ii)提出说话能力数据在预测后期语言轨迹方面的临床用途。方法用音节产生的频率来测量幼儿的发声率或发声率,其明显受父母互动的影响。低比例的口齿不清可能预示着严重的沟通障碍。在检查正常听力(NH)和听力受损(HI)婴儿安装CI的声音产生特征的出版物中,对生命第一年的发声增长进行了回顾。结果NH和CI婴儿在语言表现上存在差异,这主要归因于听觉剥夺。婴儿接受晚期CI,产生更少的音节(低语速),并表现出晚发的咿呀学语,特别是那些在12个月或之后接受手术的婴儿。早期接受者(在12个月前植入)与更多的发声有关,这被认为是源于ci发起的听觉反馈。综上所述,所产生的总音节量(口述能力)反映了语言习得的发展轨迹,而语言习得的发展轨迹又是影响人工耳蜗植入成功与否的关键因素。结论:当代的研究结果共同支持易言性作为区分早期CI成功和不成功的合理标准。有人认为,言语能力的测量可以预测语言的发展,在这样做的过程中,对设计有效的临床评估和干预实践有着巨大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Medical Journal
Australasian Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vitamin D supplementation as a fall prevention method: A systematic review Epidemiological study of scarlet fever in Shenyang City, China Local anti-inflammatory effect of vitamin D in acute and chronic gouty arthritis Differentiation of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) rapid and intermediate acetylator based on genotype and urinary assay Are we facing NOVICHOK nerve agent threat?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1