The Status of the Kable Principle in Australian Constitutional Law

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW Public Law Review Pub Date : 2004-08-01 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2631411
D. Meagher
{"title":"The Status of the Kable Principle in Australian Constitutional Law","authors":"D. Meagher","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2631411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article looks at the significance of a recent trio of High Court decisions for the status of the principle established in Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW). The Kable principle as it has come to be understood will be outlined and also why it has attracted criticism and generated controversy in some quarters. The analysis undertaken will demonstrate that the High Court has secured its status in Australian constitutional law. It will however be suggested that the more significant legacy of the Kable principle after these cases is to secure a fuller integration of the Australian judicial system and outline what this may entail for the operation of constitutional doctrine, in particular the emerging due process principle.","PeriodicalId":43092,"journal":{"name":"Public Law Review","volume":"16 1","pages":"182-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2631411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article looks at the significance of a recent trio of High Court decisions for the status of the principle established in Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW). The Kable principle as it has come to be understood will be outlined and also why it has attracted criticism and generated controversy in some quarters. The analysis undertaken will demonstrate that the High Court has secured its status in Australian constitutional law. It will however be suggested that the more significant legacy of the Kable principle after these cases is to secure a fuller integration of the Australian judicial system and outline what this may entail for the operation of constitutional doctrine, in particular the emerging due process principle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可选原则在澳大利亚宪法中的地位
本文着眼于最近高等法院对凯布尔诉公诉署署长(新南威尔士州)确立的原则地位的三个决定的意义。凯布尔原则,因为它已经被理解将概述,以及为什么它吸引了批评,并在某些方面产生了争议。所进行的分析将表明,高等法院已确保其在澳大利亚宪法法律中的地位。然而,有人认为,在这些案件之后,凯布尔原则的更重要的遗产是确保澳大利亚司法制度的更充分的一体化,并概述这对宪法原则的运作,特别是正在出现的正当程序原则可能带来的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impairment and Limited State Immunity Parliamentary Appointment or Popular Election? Breaking the Impasse on Models for an Australian 'Westminster Republic' The Constitution of the Environmental Emergency Limited Leverage: Federal Remedies and Policing Reform The Voting Rights Ratchet: Rowe v. Electoral Commissioner
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1