PERICARDIAL INVOLVEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH SARS-COV-2 INFECTION. PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATION IN THE COVID- WARD
Z. Sukmarova, E. Potapov, M. Saidova, Y. Ovchinnikov, A. Gromov
求助PDF
{"title":"PERICARDIAL INVOLVEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH SARS-COV-2 INFECTION. PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATION IN THE COVID- WARD","authors":"Z. Sukmarova, E. Potapov, M. Saidova, Y. Ovchinnikov, A. Gromov","doi":"10.21569/2222-7415-2022-12-4-30-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. To identify the occurrence and structure of changes in the pericardium ultrasonography among patients who have undergone COVID-19 and have cardiological symptoms, as well as to compare these changes with the pericarditis aspects and the infection time duration in a prospective cohort observational study. Methods. Inclusion/exclusion criteria: current or transferred COVID-19, new symptoms that occurred during or after infection and forced to consult a cardiologist, the absence of other prerequisites for pericarditis and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Echocardiography was performed with an emphasis on the pericardium and an assessment of the echogenicity amplification, the area of the hyperechoic zone, thickness and artifacts, as well as a questionnaire. Results. From 05.2020 to On 10.2020, 335 patients from the covid ward and 284 patients from the out-patient clinic were included. 86% of patients had transient chest discomfort. The peaks of treatment accrued to 4-5 and 10-11 weeks (Me 10[2-36] (1 to 64) weeks) from SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred. Typical ECG changes were registered in 3%, pericardial friction noise – in 7% of patients. In 20% of patients discomfort in the heart area was the first, in 27% – the dominant, in 14% – the only symptom of COVID-19. According to EchoCG data, 96% of the examined patients had ultrasound signs of different changes in the pericardium: slight effusion in 65%, signs of tamponade in 2%, thickening in 12%, local hyperechogenicity in 83%, local adhesion in 8% of patients. The group without pericardial changes was distinguished by the presence of epicardial fat >7 mm. A combination of the echo-cardiography criteria with the second symptom recorded at the visit or earlier was present in 76% of the applicants. Comparison of the recorded ultrasound patterns with the time elapsed since infection allowed us to distinguish ultrasound phases: 1) the phase of damage (pattern of initial edema) occurred at 1 week, 2) the phase of edema /exudation (pattern of visible effusion) – at 3 weeks, 3) fibrosis (pattern of pericardial compaction) – at 11 weeks, 4) regression of inflammatory changes (pattern of local fibrin deposition) – on week 22, 5) residual signs of transferred inflammation may be visualized in patients with symptoms 44 weeks after COVID-19. Conclusions. Consideration of the infectious process triggered by SARS-CoV-2, as a systemic inflammation, allows us to interpret the phenomenon of pericardial involvement as a reactive serositis having ultrasound phases. It was possible to trace some patterns of echocardiography at different stages of the infectious and post-infectious period. Clinical data of 76% of patients can be interpreted as pericarditis, changes in 20% – as an increase in echogenicity of the pericardium. © 2022 Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":37768,"journal":{"name":"Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2022-12-4-30-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Purpose. To identify the occurrence and structure of changes in the pericardium ultrasonography among patients who have undergone COVID-19 and have cardiological symptoms, as well as to compare these changes with the pericarditis aspects and the infection time duration in a prospective cohort observational study. Methods. Inclusion/exclusion criteria: current or transferred COVID-19, new symptoms that occurred during or after infection and forced to consult a cardiologist, the absence of other prerequisites for pericarditis and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Echocardiography was performed with an emphasis on the pericardium and an assessment of the echogenicity amplification, the area of the hyperechoic zone, thickness and artifacts, as well as a questionnaire. Results. From 05.2020 to On 10.2020, 335 patients from the covid ward and 284 patients from the out-patient clinic were included. 86% of patients had transient chest discomfort. The peaks of treatment accrued to 4-5 and 10-11 weeks (Me 10[2-36] (1 to 64) weeks) from SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred. Typical ECG changes were registered in 3%, pericardial friction noise – in 7% of patients. In 20% of patients discomfort in the heart area was the first, in 27% – the dominant, in 14% – the only symptom of COVID-19. According to EchoCG data, 96% of the examined patients had ultrasound signs of different changes in the pericardium: slight effusion in 65%, signs of tamponade in 2%, thickening in 12%, local hyperechogenicity in 83%, local adhesion in 8% of patients. The group without pericardial changes was distinguished by the presence of epicardial fat >7 mm. A combination of the echo-cardiography criteria with the second symptom recorded at the visit or earlier was present in 76% of the applicants. Comparison of the recorded ultrasound patterns with the time elapsed since infection allowed us to distinguish ultrasound phases: 1) the phase of damage (pattern of initial edema) occurred at 1 week, 2) the phase of edema /exudation (pattern of visible effusion) – at 3 weeks, 3) fibrosis (pattern of pericardial compaction) – at 11 weeks, 4) regression of inflammatory changes (pattern of local fibrin deposition) – on week 22, 5) residual signs of transferred inflammation may be visualized in patients with symptoms 44 weeks after COVID-19. Conclusions. Consideration of the infectious process triggered by SARS-CoV-2, as a systemic inflammation, allows us to interpret the phenomenon of pericardial involvement as a reactive serositis having ultrasound phases. It was possible to trace some patterns of echocardiography at different stages of the infectious and post-infectious period. Clinical data of 76% of patients can be interpreted as pericarditis, changes in 20% – as an increase in echogenicity of the pericardium. © 2022 Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology. All rights reserved.
与sars-cov-2感染相关的心包受累新冠肺炎病房的前瞻性观察
目的。前瞻性队列观察研究新冠肺炎合并心脏科症状患者心包超声改变的发生及结构,并与心包炎方面及感染时间进行比较。方法。纳入/排除标准:当前或转移的COVID-19,感染期间或之后出现的新症状并被迫咨询心脏病专家,没有心包炎的其他先决条件和接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗。超声心动图的重点是心包,并评估回声放大,高回声区面积,厚度和伪影,以及问卷调查。结果。从2020年5月5日至2020年10月10日,纳入新冠病房患者335例,门诊患者284例。86%的患者有短暂的胸部不适。治疗高峰出现在SARS-CoV-2感染后4 ~ 5周和10 ~ 11周(Me 10[2-36](1 ~ 64)周)。3%的患者有典型心电图改变,7%的患者有心包摩擦噪声。在20%的患者中,心脏部位的不适是第一个症状,27%的患者是主要症状,14%的患者是COVID-19的唯一症状。根据EchoCG资料,96%的检查患者心包有不同改变的超声征象:65%的患者有轻微积液,2%的患者有填塞征象,12%的患者有增厚,83%的患者有局部高回声,8%的患者有局部粘连。无心包改变组以心外膜脂肪团(约7mm)的存在来区分。超声心动图标准与就诊时或更早记录的第二症状的结合出现在76%的申请人中。将记录的超声模式与感染后的时间进行比较,使我们能够区分超声阶段:1)损伤阶段(初始水肿模式)发生在1周,2)水肿/渗出阶段(可见积液模式)-在3周,3)纤维化(心包压实模式)-在11周,4)炎症变化消退(局部纤维蛋白沉积模式)-在22周,5)在COVID-19后44周出现症状的患者可能会看到转移性炎症的残余迹象。结论。考虑到SARS-CoV-2引发的感染过程是一种全身性炎症,我们可以将心包受累现象解释为具有超声期的反应性浆膜炎。在感染和感染后的不同阶段,超声心动图的一些模式是可以追踪的。临床资料显示76%的患者可解释为心包炎,20%的患者可解释为心包回声增强。©2022俄罗斯放射学电子杂志。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。