Influence of Xanthomonas euvesicatoria pv. allii on germination of 12 onion varieties

N. J. Kavhiza, M. Zargar, S. I. Prikhodko, E. Pakina, Simbo Diakite
{"title":"Influence of Xanthomonas euvesicatoria pv. allii on germination of 12 onion varieties","authors":"N. J. Kavhiza, M. Zargar, S. I. Prikhodko, E. Pakina, Simbo Diakite","doi":"10.22363/2312-797x-2023-18-2-174-185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Onion bacterial blight is a problematic disease affecting onion production in many countries. The disease is seed-transmitted, hence difficult to control. The study was based on the effects of bacteria on germination percentage and germination energy of various commercial onion varieties. Twelve commercial varieties were obtained from the market and inoculated with bacteria and then tested for germination percentage and germination energy. For most onion varieties, the level of germination inhibition increased with increasing bacterial concentration. On the 5th day of recording, the germination of onion seeds of the variety Karantansky which were inoculated with bacteria at a concentration of 108 CFU/ml differed significantly from the germination of seeds in the control variant. At the same time, seed germination was similar to the control when using bacteria at a concentration of 106 cfu/ml. On the 14th day of record, it was found that the highest concentration (108 CFU/ ml) caused the highest level of inhibition in most onion seeds, while moderate levels were observed at 106 CFU/ ml and the lowest concentration (104 CFU/ml) caused the least inhibition. In the cultivar Khaltsedon, seeds did not germinate at any of the bacterial concentrations compared to 8 % germination in the control. Regarding germination energy, the highest concentration of inoculum on the 5th day of record had the greatest effect in 3 varieties: Myachkovsky 300, Carmen MS and Khaltsedon with germination energy of 3, 2 and 0 %, respectively. In most varieties, the highest bacterial concentration of 108 CFU/ml had the least effect on germination energy, followed by 106 CFU/ml and the highest of 104 CFU/ml on the 14th day of record. However, there were no differences in the effect of concentrations for the varieties Karantansky and Khaltsedon, although all treatments differed significantly from controls (p 0.05).","PeriodicalId":53086,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-797x-2023-18-2-174-185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Onion bacterial blight is a problematic disease affecting onion production in many countries. The disease is seed-transmitted, hence difficult to control. The study was based on the effects of bacteria on germination percentage and germination energy of various commercial onion varieties. Twelve commercial varieties were obtained from the market and inoculated with bacteria and then tested for germination percentage and germination energy. For most onion varieties, the level of germination inhibition increased with increasing bacterial concentration. On the 5th day of recording, the germination of onion seeds of the variety Karantansky which were inoculated with bacteria at a concentration of 108 CFU/ml differed significantly from the germination of seeds in the control variant. At the same time, seed germination was similar to the control when using bacteria at a concentration of 106 cfu/ml. On the 14th day of record, it was found that the highest concentration (108 CFU/ ml) caused the highest level of inhibition in most onion seeds, while moderate levels were observed at 106 CFU/ ml and the lowest concentration (104 CFU/ml) caused the least inhibition. In the cultivar Khaltsedon, seeds did not germinate at any of the bacterial concentrations compared to 8 % germination in the control. Regarding germination energy, the highest concentration of inoculum on the 5th day of record had the greatest effect in 3 varieties: Myachkovsky 300, Carmen MS and Khaltsedon with germination energy of 3, 2 and 0 %, respectively. In most varieties, the highest bacterial concentration of 108 CFU/ml had the least effect on germination energy, followed by 106 CFU/ml and the highest of 104 CFU/ml on the 14th day of record. However, there were no differences in the effect of concentrations for the varieties Karantansky and Khaltsedon, although all treatments differed significantly from controls (p 0.05).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紫叶黄单胞菌的影响。大蒜对12个洋葱品种发芽的影响
洋葱细菌性枯萎病是影响许多国家洋葱生产的一大问题。这种病是通过种子传播的,因此很难控制。研究了细菌对不同商品洋葱品种发芽率和发芽能的影响。从市场上获得12个商品品种,接种细菌,测定发芽率和发芽能。对大多数洋葱品种来说,随着细菌浓度的增加,萌发抑制程度也随之增加。在记录的第5天,接种108 CFU/ml细菌的洋葱品种Karantansky的种子发芽率与对照品种的种子发芽率有显著差异。同时,当细菌浓度为106 cfu/ml时,种子萌发率与对照相似。在记录的第14天,发现最高浓度(108 CFU/ml)对大多数洋葱种子的抑制程度最高,106 CFU/ml为中等浓度,最低浓度(104 CFU/ml)对洋葱种子的抑制程度最低。与8%的细菌浓度相比,在任何细菌浓度下,种子都没有发芽。在萌发能方面,记录第5天最高接种量对Myachkovsky 300、Carmen MS和Khaltsedon 3个品种的萌发能影响最大,分别为3.2%、2%和0%。在大多数品种中,最高细菌浓度为108 CFU/ml对萌发能的影响最小,其次是106 CFU/ml,记录第14天最高为104 CFU/ml。不同浓度处理对卡兰塔斯基(Karantansky)和卡勒泽顿(Khaltsedon)的影响差异不显著(p < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of fungicides on potato pathogen in the Tambov region of the Russian Federation Cytological and microbiotic aspects of the diagnosis of otitis externa in dogs Allelic frequency of beta-lactoglobulin gene in different cattle breeds Features of growing new cultivars of annual flowering plants in Kola Subarctic Efficacy of COP-based protocol used with raltegravir in treatment of cats with mediastinal lymphoma and progressive viral leukemia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1