THE IMAGE OF THE PANDEMIC: DISCUSSION AMONG ORTHODOX CLERICS (ROC MP) ON THE PANDEMIC

Q3 Arts and Humanities Religiovedenie Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.22250/2072-8662.2021.2.119-127
A. Blinkova, S. M. Shurukht
{"title":"THE IMAGE OF THE PANDEMIC: DISCUSSION AMONG ORTHODOX CLERICS (ROC MP) ON THE PANDEMIC","authors":"A. Blinkova, S. M. Shurukht","doi":"10.22250/2072-8662.2021.2.119-127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes views among clerics of the ROC (MP) on coronavirus and its spread broadcasted in Telegram channels from March 1 to June 30, 2020, during the first wave of the Coronavirus in Russia. Psycholinguistic and content analysis of 166 posts devoted to one or another aspect of the pandemic in the agenda of six analyzed popular Telegram channels allows to define the main themes that to varying degrees reflect the existing opinions in church on the origins of COVID-19, the risks of being infected, as well as the restrictions introduced by governmental and medical authorities to prevent the disease from spreading. The results obtained from two different kinds of analysis reveal the problematic situation among official church representatives towards the pandemic. Due to the lack of a clear position of the hierarchy they act in accordance with their personal reasons and understandings which often may cause real harm to the audience relying on clerics’ opinions. What is interesting, such views encompass both the sentiments of COVID-dissidents denying the very existence of the virus and its risks that leads to their disregard of safety precautions as well as the views of ‘undecided’ who prefer to confine themselves to cautionary statements without taking any additional actions.","PeriodicalId":36158,"journal":{"name":"Religiovedenie","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religiovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22250/2072-8662.2021.2.119-127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes views among clerics of the ROC (MP) on coronavirus and its spread broadcasted in Telegram channels from March 1 to June 30, 2020, during the first wave of the Coronavirus in Russia. Psycholinguistic and content analysis of 166 posts devoted to one or another aspect of the pandemic in the agenda of six analyzed popular Telegram channels allows to define the main themes that to varying degrees reflect the existing opinions in church on the origins of COVID-19, the risks of being infected, as well as the restrictions introduced by governmental and medical authorities to prevent the disease from spreading. The results obtained from two different kinds of analysis reveal the problematic situation among official church representatives towards the pandemic. Due to the lack of a clear position of the hierarchy they act in accordance with their personal reasons and understandings which often may cause real harm to the audience relying on clerics’ opinions. What is interesting, such views encompass both the sentiments of COVID-dissidents denying the very existence of the virus and its risks that leads to their disregard of safety precautions as well as the views of ‘undecided’ who prefer to confine themselves to cautionary statements without taking any additional actions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行的形象:东正教神职人员对大流行的讨论
本文分析了2020年3月1日至6月30日在俄罗斯第一波冠状病毒疫情期间,中华民国(国会)神职人员对冠状病毒及其传播的看法。通过对六个受欢迎的电报频道的166个帖子进行心理语言学和内容分析,可以确定不同程度上反映教会对COVID-19起源,感染风险以及政府和医疗当局为防止疾病传播而引入的限制的现有观点的主题。从两种不同的分析中获得的结果揭示了官方教会代表对大流行病的问题情况。由于缺乏明确的等级地位,他们根据自己的个人原因和理解行事,往往会因为神职人员的意见而对听众造成真正的伤害。有趣的是,这些观点既包括了对covid - 19持不同政见者的观点,他们否认病毒的存在及其风险,导致他们无视安全预防措施,也包括了“犹豫不决”的观点,他们更愿意将自己局限于告诫性声明,而不采取任何额外行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Religiovedenie
Religiovedenie Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
N. Berdyaev as a Researcher of the Religious Mysticism of Christianity: The Specificity of the Philosophical Approach Japanese Lotus Sūtra Tradition in Konjaku monogatari shū in Japan Religious Life of the North Manchurian City in Chinese Literature of the First Half of the 20th Century (“The Legend of the Hulan River” by Xiao Hong) Chinese Dragon as a Heavenly Omen Social and Cultural Nature of Religious Fundamentalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1