AXIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF ORTHODOX AND PHILOSOPHICAL THEISM (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF V.D. KUDRYAVTSEV-PLATONOV)

Q3 Arts and Humanities Religiovedenie Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.22250/2072-8662.2021.2.97-103
A. G. Sakhatskii
{"title":"AXIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF ORTHODOX AND PHILOSOPHICAL THEISM (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF V.D. KUDRYAVTSEV-PLATONOV)","authors":"A. G. Sakhatskii","doi":"10.22250/2072-8662.2021.2.97-103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the transcendental method applied to the axiology of Russian religious philosophy on the example of V.D. Kudryavtsev-Platonov’s works. The author offers a description of the contradiction between the transcendental method in the form in which it was implemented in Platonism and Kantianism as variants of non-Christian philosophizing, and Orthodox theism. Platonism and Kantianism tried to justify such a variant of the relationship between the transcendent and the immanent, which can be called transcendentism. In axiological terms, transcendentism represents the sphere of values as something that belongs to a special world: in Platonism, the sphere of values is identical to the sphere of ideas; in the Kantian tradition, it is placed in the consciousness of a conditional transcendental subject. Both versions of philosophizing lead to the divorce of the spiritual and material principles of the world due to their abstraction, and not concreteness. The author concludes That V...","PeriodicalId":36158,"journal":{"name":"Religiovedenie","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religiovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22250/2072-8662.2021.2.97-103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the transcendental method applied to the axiology of Russian religious philosophy on the example of V.D. Kudryavtsev-Platonov’s works. The author offers a description of the contradiction between the transcendental method in the form in which it was implemented in Platonism and Kantianism as variants of non-Christian philosophizing, and Orthodox theism. Platonism and Kantianism tried to justify such a variant of the relationship between the transcendent and the immanent, which can be called transcendentism. In axiological terms, transcendentism represents the sphere of values as something that belongs to a special world: in Platonism, the sphere of values is identical to the sphere of ideas; in the Kantian tradition, it is placed in the consciousness of a conditional transcendental subject. Both versions of philosophizing lead to the divorce of the spiritual and material principles of the world due to their abstraction, and not concreteness. The author concludes That V...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正统有神论和哲学有神论的价值论方面(以库德里亚夫采夫-柏拉图诺夫哲学为例)
本文以库德里亚夫采夫-柏拉图诺夫的著作为例,分析了先验方法在俄罗斯宗教哲学价值论中的应用。作者描述了作为非基督教哲学变体的柏拉图主义和康德主义所采用的先验方法与正统有神论之间的矛盾。柏拉图主义和康德主义试图证明这种先验与内在关系的变体是正确的,这种变体可以被称为先验主义。在价值论中,先验主义把价值领域表现为属于一个特殊世界的东西;在柏拉图主义中,价值领域与理念领域是同一的;在康德的传统中,它被置于一个有条件的先验主体的意识中。这两种哲学都是抽象的,而不是具体的,导致了世界的精神原则和物质原则的分离。作者的结论是……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Religiovedenie
Religiovedenie Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
N. Berdyaev as a Researcher of the Religious Mysticism of Christianity: The Specificity of the Philosophical Approach Japanese Lotus Sūtra Tradition in Konjaku monogatari shū in Japan Religious Life of the North Manchurian City in Chinese Literature of the First Half of the 20th Century (“The Legend of the Hulan River” by Xiao Hong) Chinese Dragon as a Heavenly Omen Social and Cultural Nature of Religious Fundamentalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1