Are another 5 years of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy needed?

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy Pub Date : 2016-11-14 DOI:10.2147/BCTT.S122820
Qin-Guo Mo, De-Quan Li, Jian-Hong Zhong, Chang-Yuan Wei
{"title":"Are another 5 years of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy needed?","authors":"Qin-Guo Mo, De-Quan Li, Jian-Hong Zhong, Chang-Yuan Wei","doi":"10.2147/BCTT.S122820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms In the recent issue of Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy, some questions about adju-vant systemic therapy 1 and bone loss and skeletal-related events in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer 2 were discussed by two reviews. We are concerned about the content of adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmeno-pausal women who have hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Guidelines recommended a minimum of 5 years of adjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor (in either order) for such patients. 3–5 However, the safety and efficacy of extending treatment with an aromatase inhibitor for another 5 years are unknown. Recently, Goss et al 6 reported results from the MA.17R trial in favor of extending the use of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for another 5 years in such patients. Women receiving such therapy showed significantly higher disease-free survival and lower incidence of contralateral breast cancer than women on placebo for the same period. On the basis of these findings, Goss et al 6 recommended extending letrozole therapy for another 5 years. As stated by these two reviews 1,2 and another review, 7 such a recommendation should be counterbalanced against the possibility that, for many patients, prolonging letrozole therapy may provide no benefit or may, in fact, cause more harm than good. In the study by Goss et al, 6 the overall survival at 5 years was similar between patients receiving letrozole or placebo for another 5 years (P=0.83) and the two groups were similar on most of the quality-of-life measures applied. The two groups also had no significant differences in any of the prespecified subgroups. More importantly, bone-related toxic events, including bone pain, fracture, and new-onset osteoporosis, were significantly more common in the letrozole group than in the placebo group. Only ~3% of patients in each arm of the study died from breast cancer-related recurrence, suggesting that the cohort may have passed the peak of tumor recurrence risk, perhaps in part because they had already undergone 4.5–6.0 years of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy. In addition, the best we know for now is that young patients may die from tumor recurrence, while old patients …","PeriodicalId":9106,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","volume":"8 1","pages":"207 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/BCTT.S122820","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S122820","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms In the recent issue of Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy, some questions about adju-vant systemic therapy 1 and bone loss and skeletal-related events in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer 2 were discussed by two reviews. We are concerned about the content of adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmeno-pausal women who have hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Guidelines recommended a minimum of 5 years of adjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor (in either order) for such patients. 3–5 However, the safety and efficacy of extending treatment with an aromatase inhibitor for another 5 years are unknown. Recently, Goss et al 6 reported results from the MA.17R trial in favor of extending the use of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for another 5 years in such patients. Women receiving such therapy showed significantly higher disease-free survival and lower incidence of contralateral breast cancer than women on placebo for the same period. On the basis of these findings, Goss et al 6 recommended extending letrozole therapy for another 5 years. As stated by these two reviews 1,2 and another review, 7 such a recommendation should be counterbalanced against the possibility that, for many patients, prolonging letrozole therapy may provide no benefit or may, in fact, cause more harm than good. In the study by Goss et al, 6 the overall survival at 5 years was similar between patients receiving letrozole or placebo for another 5 years (P=0.83) and the two groups were similar on most of the quality-of-life measures applied. The two groups also had no significant differences in any of the prespecified subgroups. More importantly, bone-related toxic events, including bone pain, fracture, and new-onset osteoporosis, were significantly more common in the letrozole group than in the placebo group. Only ~3% of patients in each arm of the study died from breast cancer-related recurrence, suggesting that the cohort may have passed the peak of tumor recurrence risk, perhaps in part because they had already undergone 4.5–6.0 years of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy. In addition, the best we know for now is that young patients may die from tumor recurrence, while old patients …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是否需要再进行5年的芳香酶抑制剂辅助治疗?
您特此接受本条款。允许非商业用途的工作,没有任何进一步的许可,从多芬医学出版社有限公司,只要工作适当署名。在最近一期的《乳腺癌:靶点和治疗》中,两篇综述讨论了绝经后激素受体阳性乳腺癌妇女的辅助全身治疗1、骨质流失和骨骼相关事件2的一些问题。我们关注激素受体阳性的早期乳腺癌绝经后妇女的辅助内分泌治疗的内容。指南建议对这类患者进行至少5年的芳香化酶抑制剂或他莫昔芬辅助治疗,然后再使用芳香化酶抑制剂(顺序可选)。3-5然而,延长芳香化酶抑制剂治疗5年的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。最近,Goss等6报道了MA.17R试验的结果,支持在这类患者中再延长5年辅助芳香化酶抑制剂治疗的使用。与同期服用安慰剂的妇女相比,接受这种治疗的妇女显示出明显更高的无病生存率和更低的对侧乳腺癌发病率。基于这些发现,Goss等6建议将来曲唑治疗再延长5年。正如这两篇综述1,2和另一篇综述所述,对于许多患者来说,延长来曲唑治疗可能没有益处,或者实际上可能弊大于利,这样的建议应该与这种可能性相平衡。在Goss等人的研究中,再接受来曲唑或安慰剂治疗5年的患者5年总生存率相似(P=0.83),两组在大多数生活质量测量上相似。两组在任何预先指定的亚组中也没有显著差异。更重要的是,骨相关的毒性事件,包括骨痛、骨折和新发骨质疏松症,在来曲唑组比安慰剂组明显更常见。该研究的每组中只有约3%的患者死于乳腺癌相关复发,这表明该队列可能已经超过了肿瘤复发风险的峰值,部分原因可能是他们已经接受了4.5-6.0年的辅助芳香酶抑制剂治疗。此外,我们目前所知道的最多的是,年轻患者可能死于肿瘤复发,而老年患者……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Prospective Tumour Marker for Breast Cancer: YWHAB and Its Role in Promoting Oncogenic Phenotypes. The Clinical Study of Intratumoral and Peritumoral Radiomics Based on DCE-MRI for HER-2 Positive and Low Expression Prediction in Breast Cancer. Exploring the Complexity of Pan-Cancer: Gene Convergences and in silico Analyses. Comparison of Hematological Parameters and the Associated Factors Among Women with and without Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study. A Novel Peroxisome-Related Gene Signature Predicts Breast Cancer Prognosis and Correlates with T Cell Suppression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1