{"title":"Teaching History in Russia after the Collapse of the USSR.","authors":"Tatyana Volodina","doi":"10.2307/1555718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DRAMATIC CONFLICTS and ideological changes occurred in Russia during the past decade. They inevitably influenced Russian education, particularly history teaching. We can identify a number of problems that have arisen in history education, from the emergence of new ideological symbols to inequities between schools for the rich and schools for the poor. In this essay I would like to call readers' attention to two issues. The first concerns the popularity of history among Russian high school students. The second looks at the problem of national identity and how it has played out in history teaching.1 In Russia, students' attitudes towards history education tend to differ markedly from those of American and European youth. Writing about American schools, James W. Loewen observed, \"High school students hate history. When they list their favorite subjects, history invariably comes in last.\"2 Even considering Loewen's tendency to strong opinions, we cannot overlook his point. Evidence of similar attitudes has been exposed in many countries of Western Europe. In the 1990s, the Koerber Institute in Germany carried out a large survey titled Youth and History: The Comparative European Project on Historical Consciousness among Teenagers. Sampling 35,000 students in twenty-seven countries of West-","PeriodicalId":83054,"journal":{"name":"The History teacher","volume":"38 1","pages":"179-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1555718","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The History teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1555718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
DRAMATIC CONFLICTS and ideological changes occurred in Russia during the past decade. They inevitably influenced Russian education, particularly history teaching. We can identify a number of problems that have arisen in history education, from the emergence of new ideological symbols to inequities between schools for the rich and schools for the poor. In this essay I would like to call readers' attention to two issues. The first concerns the popularity of history among Russian high school students. The second looks at the problem of national identity and how it has played out in history teaching.1 In Russia, students' attitudes towards history education tend to differ markedly from those of American and European youth. Writing about American schools, James W. Loewen observed, "High school students hate history. When they list their favorite subjects, history invariably comes in last."2 Even considering Loewen's tendency to strong opinions, we cannot overlook his point. Evidence of similar attitudes has been exposed in many countries of Western Europe. In the 1990s, the Koerber Institute in Germany carried out a large survey titled Youth and History: The Comparative European Project on Historical Consciousness among Teenagers. Sampling 35,000 students in twenty-seven countries of West-
在过去的十年里,俄罗斯发生了剧烈的冲突和意识形态的变化。他们不可避免地影响了俄罗斯的教育,尤其是历史教学。我们可以发现历史教育中出现的一些问题,从新的意识形态符号的出现到富人学校和穷人学校之间的不平等。在这篇文章中,我想提请读者注意两个问题。第一个问题是俄罗斯高中生对历史的喜爱程度。第二部分着眼于国家认同问题及其在历史教学中的表现在俄罗斯,学生对历史教育的态度往往与美国和欧洲的年轻人有明显的不同。在谈到美国学校时,詹姆斯·w·罗文(James W. Loewen)写道:“高中生讨厌历史。当他们列出自己最喜欢的科目时,历史总是排在最后。即使考虑到罗文倾向于固执己见,我们也不能忽视他的观点。西欧许多国家也有类似态度的证据。20世纪90年代,德国Koerber研究所进行了一项名为“青年与历史:青少年历史意识的比较欧洲项目”的大型调查。抽样调查了西方27个国家的35000名学生