L’égalité réelle et la mise en œuvre intégrale du principe de Jordan

A. Levesque
{"title":"L’égalité réelle et la mise en œuvre intégrale du principe de Jordan","authors":"A. Levesque","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the problems and delays that have occurred in the implementation of Jordan’s Principle within the Government of Canada. The paper first provides an overview of the allegations of discrimination made by the Assembly of First Nations and the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society in their human rights complaint against Canada regarding the jurisdictional disputes and lack of coordination between the various levels of government and between government departments and the harmful impact they have on First Nations children. It then summarizes the initial decision of the Canadian Human Rights Commission [CHRC] in January 2016 concerning Jordan’s Principle. The problems and delays associated with implementation of the CHRC decision are examined, and the May 2017 CHRC order compelling Canada to take concrete measures to comply with its initial decision is reviewed in detail. The final part of the paper advances the position that in order to genuinely ensure substantive equality in Canadian society, Canada must be more proactive in identifying and remedying its discriminatory practices. In this case, putting the Spirit Bear Plan into effect within the Canadian government offers a promising way forward for ending injustices in the delivery of public services for First Nations children.","PeriodicalId":56232,"journal":{"name":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","volume":"36 1","pages":"231-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper deals with the problems and delays that have occurred in the implementation of Jordan’s Principle within the Government of Canada. The paper first provides an overview of the allegations of discrimination made by the Assembly of First Nations and the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society in their human rights complaint against Canada regarding the jurisdictional disputes and lack of coordination between the various levels of government and between government departments and the harmful impact they have on First Nations children. It then summarizes the initial decision of the Canadian Human Rights Commission [CHRC] in January 2016 concerning Jordan’s Principle. The problems and delays associated with implementation of the CHRC decision are examined, and the May 2017 CHRC order compelling Canada to take concrete measures to comply with its initial decision is reviewed in detail. The final part of the paper advances the position that in order to genuinely ensure substantive equality in Canadian society, Canada must be more proactive in identifying and remedying its discriminatory practices. In this case, putting the Spirit Bear Plan into effect within the Canadian government offers a promising way forward for ending injustices in the delivery of public services for First Nations children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实质平等和充分执行约旦原则
本文讨论在加拿大政府内执行约旦原则时出现的问题和延误。该文件首先概述了第一民族大会和第一民族儿童和家庭关怀协会在其针对加拿大的人权申诉中提出的歧视指控,涉及各级政府之间和政府部门之间的管辖权争端和缺乏协调,以及它们对第一民族儿童的有害影响。然后总结了2016年1月加拿大人权委员会(CHRC)关于约旦原则的初步决定。审查了与CHRC决定执行相关的问题和延误,并详细审查了2017年5月CHRC命令,该命令迫使加拿大采取具体措施遵守其初始决定。该文件的最后一部分提出的立场是,为了真正确保加拿大社会的实质性平等,加拿大必须更积极主动地查明和纠正其歧视性做法。在这种情况下,在加拿大政府内部实施灵熊计划,为结束在为第一民族儿童提供公共服务方面的不公正提供了一条有希望的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Swimming Up Niagara Falls! The Battle to Get Disability Rights Added to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms The Triumph of the “Therapeutic” in Quebec Courts: Mental Health, Behavioural Reform and the Decline of Rights The Influence of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on Canadian Jurisprudence in the First Decade Since its Ratification Students in Name Only: Improving the Working Conditions of Articled Students Via the Application of the BC Employment Standards Act People With Disabilities Need Lawyers Too! A Ready-To-Use Plan for Law Schools to Educate Law Students to Effectively Serve the Legal Needs of Clients With Disabilities as Well as Clients Without Disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1