Knowledge of medical specialists on the emergency management of hyperkalaemia with a focus on insulin-based therapy

M. Chothia, U. Chikte, R. Davids
{"title":"Knowledge of medical specialists on the emergency management of hyperkalaemia with a focus on insulin-based therapy","authors":"M. Chothia, U. Chikte, R. Davids","doi":"10.21804/25-1-5002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hyperkalaemia is a common electrolyte disorder in hospitalised patients and may cause life-threatening cardiac arrythmias and death. There is a lack of consensus regarding its optimal management, which may result in wide variations in practice and the guidance provided to junior staff. Methods: We conducted a survey on a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) platform to evaluate the knowledge of medical specialists regarding the diagnosis and management of hyperkalaemia, with a focus on insulinbased therapy. A convenience sample of 70 specialists in nephrology, internal medicine, emergency medicine and critical-care medicine were invited to participate. Comparisons were also made between nephrologists and nonnephrologists. Results: A total of 51 medical specialists responded, of whom 47% were nephrologists. They were more likely to initiate therapy at a potassium concentration ([K]) of 6 mmol/L, whereas non-nephrologists tended to start at a lower concentration (P < 0.01). Half the respondents regarded blood gas machine measurements as providing an accurate measure of [K]. Non-nephrologists were more likely to perform an ECG before starting treatment (P = 0.02). All respondents regarded insulin and dextrose as the most effective and reliable means for shifting K. Only 22% monitored the serum glucose concentration beyond 2 hours following insulin-based therapy, and 22% thought that hypoglycaemia was an uncommon complication if dextrose also was administered. Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive survey to report on the knowledge of specialists regarding the emergency management of hyperkalaemia. There is a need to address knowledge gaps, particularly around the optimal and safe use of insulin-based therapies. Our findings and recommendations should be useful in informing the development of consensus guidelines and educational resources on hyperkalaemia.","PeriodicalId":32934,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Nephrology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21804/25-1-5002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Hyperkalaemia is a common electrolyte disorder in hospitalised patients and may cause life-threatening cardiac arrythmias and death. There is a lack of consensus regarding its optimal management, which may result in wide variations in practice and the guidance provided to junior staff. Methods: We conducted a survey on a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) platform to evaluate the knowledge of medical specialists regarding the diagnosis and management of hyperkalaemia, with a focus on insulinbased therapy. A convenience sample of 70 specialists in nephrology, internal medicine, emergency medicine and critical-care medicine were invited to participate. Comparisons were also made between nephrologists and nonnephrologists. Results: A total of 51 medical specialists responded, of whom 47% were nephrologists. They were more likely to initiate therapy at a potassium concentration ([K]) of 6 mmol/L, whereas non-nephrologists tended to start at a lower concentration (P < 0.01). Half the respondents regarded blood gas machine measurements as providing an accurate measure of [K]. Non-nephrologists were more likely to perform an ECG before starting treatment (P = 0.02). All respondents regarded insulin and dextrose as the most effective and reliable means for shifting K. Only 22% monitored the serum glucose concentration beyond 2 hours following insulin-based therapy, and 22% thought that hypoglycaemia was an uncommon complication if dextrose also was administered. Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive survey to report on the knowledge of specialists regarding the emergency management of hyperkalaemia. There is a need to address knowledge gaps, particularly around the optimal and safe use of insulin-based therapies. Our findings and recommendations should be useful in informing the development of consensus guidelines and educational resources on hyperkalaemia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学专家对高钾血症紧急管理的了解,重点是胰岛素治疗
导读:高钾血症是住院患者常见的电解质紊乱,可导致危及生命的心律失常和死亡。对其最佳管理缺乏一致意见,这可能导致在实践和向初级工作人员提供的指导方面存在很大差异。方法:我们在研究电子数据采集(REDCap)平台上进行了一项调查,以评估医学专家对高钾血症的诊断和管理的知识,重点是胰岛素治疗。为了方便起见,我们邀请了肾病学、内科、急诊医学和重症监护医学方面的70名专家参与调查。肾脏科医生和非肾脏科医生之间也进行了比较。结果:共有51名医学专家回应,其中47%是肾病专家。他们更有可能在钾浓度([K])为6 mmol/L时开始治疗,而非肾病学家倾向于在较低浓度时开始治疗(P < 0.01)。一半的受访者认为血气机测量提供了准确的测量[K]。非肾病专家更有可能在开始治疗前进行心电图检查(P = 0.02)。所有的受访者都认为胰岛素和葡萄糖是最有效和可靠的转移k的方法,只有22%的人在胰岛素治疗后监测超过2小时的血清葡萄糖浓度,22%的人认为如果同时使用葡萄糖,低血糖是一种罕见的并发症。结论:这是第一个全面的调查报告关于专家的知识,关于高钾血症的应急管理。有必要解决知识差距,特别是在胰岛素治疗的最佳和安全使用方面。我们的发现和建议应该有助于制定高钾血症的共识指南和教育资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
Quality of life of patients with kidney failure in sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a systematic review of quantitative studies Acute kidney injury and in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19 in Ghana – a single centre study Patterns of biopsy-proven kidney disease amongst South African adults from 1995 to 2017 Vascular access in Senegalese patients starting chronic haemodialysis From Alpha to Omicron: anatomy of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in an outpatient haemodialysis unit in Johannesburg, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1