Explicit Communication: An Interest and Belief-Based Model

Q1 Arts and Humanities Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.22381/lpi1720183
M. Cruciani
{"title":"Explicit Communication: An Interest and Belief-Based Model","authors":"M. Cruciani","doi":"10.22381/lpi1720183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents an inferential model of explicit communication based on the speaker’s interests and the addressee’s beliefs. After the introduction, the paper sets out some notions concerning explicit communication within the frameworks of truth-conditional pragmatics and relevance theory. The third section describes the phenomenon of semantic underdeterminacy, and the fourth section introduces non-demonstrative inferences in communication. The fifth section presents the model. The main notions involved are the speaker’s intended meaning and the addressee’s intended meaning. The former notion is centered on the speaker’s interest in situation: a speaker intends the meaning of an utterance on the basis of a partial order of preference with respect to a set of contextually plausible meanings. The latter notion is centered on the addressee’s communicative inference, which is based on the addressee’s belief about the speaker’s interest. The paper takes the notion of interest from cognitive social theory, the notion of meaning from semantics, and the notion of explicit meaning from pragmatics; and it uses the notion of communicative inference for explicit meaning in partial accordance with relevance theory. In the sixth section, the paper argues in favor of the inferential approach compared with the associative approach in determination of “what is said.” The paper’s method is conceptual analysis of declarative utterances used in communicative situations. The main finding of the paper has been to show that, in contextual underdeterminacy cases, speaker’s interest is a determining factor in communicative processes.","PeriodicalId":53498,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations","volume":"17 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22381/lpi1720183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper presents an inferential model of explicit communication based on the speaker’s interests and the addressee’s beliefs. After the introduction, the paper sets out some notions concerning explicit communication within the frameworks of truth-conditional pragmatics and relevance theory. The third section describes the phenomenon of semantic underdeterminacy, and the fourth section introduces non-demonstrative inferences in communication. The fifth section presents the model. The main notions involved are the speaker’s intended meaning and the addressee’s intended meaning. The former notion is centered on the speaker’s interest in situation: a speaker intends the meaning of an utterance on the basis of a partial order of preference with respect to a set of contextually plausible meanings. The latter notion is centered on the addressee’s communicative inference, which is based on the addressee’s belief about the speaker’s interest. The paper takes the notion of interest from cognitive social theory, the notion of meaning from semantics, and the notion of explicit meaning from pragmatics; and it uses the notion of communicative inference for explicit meaning in partial accordance with relevance theory. In the sixth section, the paper argues in favor of the inferential approach compared with the associative approach in determination of “what is said.” The paper’s method is conceptual analysis of declarative utterances used in communicative situations. The main finding of the paper has been to show that, in contextual underdeterminacy cases, speaker’s interest is a determining factor in communicative processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
显性沟通:基于兴趣和信念的模式
本文提出了一种基于说话人的兴趣和受语人的信念的显性交际推理模型。在此基础上,本文提出了在真理条件语用学和关联理论的框架下有关显性交际的一些概念。第三部分描述了语义欠确定性现象,第四部分介绍了交际中的非指示推理。第五部分给出了模型。所涉及的主要概念是说话人的意图和收件人的意图。前者的概念集中在说话人对情境的兴趣上:说话人根据相对于一组语境上似是而非的意义的部分偏好顺序来意图话语的意义。后者的概念以受话者的交际推理为中心,这种交际推理是建立在受话者对说话人的兴趣的信念基础上的。本文从认知社会理论中引入兴趣概念,从语义学中引入意义概念,从语用学中引入显性意义概念;它使用交际推理的概念来解释显性意义,这与关联理论是部分一致的。在第六节中,本文论证了在确定“所说的内容”时,推理方法比联想方法更有利。本文的研究方法是对交际情景中的陈述句进行概念分析。本文的主要发现是表明,在语境不确定性情况下,说话人的兴趣是交际过程的决定性因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations
Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Interactive 3D Geo-Visualization Systems, Deep Learning-based Image Classification Algorithms, and Virtual Navigation and Simulation Modeling Tools across Web3-powered Metaverse Worlds Deep Learning-Based Object Detection and Holographic Virtual Imaging Technologies, Mobile Biometric and Sentiment Data, and Digital Twin Simulation and Modeling Tools in the Metaverse Economy Digital Twin and Metaverse Technologies, Geospatial Simulation and Sensor Fusion Tools, and Object Perception and Motion Control Algorithms in Immersive Hyper-Connected Virtual Spaces Geospatial Big Data Management and Computer Vision Algorithms, Remote Sensing and Image Recognition Technologies, and Event Modeling and Forecasting Tools in the Virtual Economy of the Metaverse Movement and Behavior Tracking Tools, Spatial Computing and Visual Perception Algorithms, and Deep Learning-based Sensing and Digital Twin Technologies in the Virtual Economy of the Metaverse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1