Publishing at "the request of friends": Alexander Ross and James Beattie’s Authorial Networks in Eighteenth-Century Aberdeen

Q2 Arts and Humanities Authorship Pub Date : 2016-06-30 DOI:10.21825/AJ.V5I1.2352
Ruth Knezevich
{"title":"Publishing at \"the request of friends\": Alexander Ross and James Beattie’s Authorial Networks in Eighteenth-Century Aberdeen","authors":"Ruth Knezevich","doi":"10.21825/AJ.V5I1.2352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Authorship in eighteenth-century Aberdeen often functioned differently than in London and Edinburgh. The Aberdeen model of authorship relied heavily on an intricate network of booksellers, patrons, readers, and critics involved in preparing a text to be consumed by the reading public; yet the prevailing narrative of the author as rising to “inspired genius” disallows for this network. The authorial career of poet Alexander Ross and his friend/mentorship with philosopher James Beattie offers a useful case study of the Aberdeen model—especially when approached through a lens of book history to consider the material practices surrounding the production of a literary work. Both Ross’s career in particular and eighteenth-century Aberdeen offer ways to historicize the concept of the “inspired genius” emerging at the end of the eighteenth century. Therefore, addressing the authorial careers of Ross and Beattie opens up new avenues for discussion, both of these poets in particular and of discourses of authorial practices in general.","PeriodicalId":30455,"journal":{"name":"Authorship","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Authorship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/AJ.V5I1.2352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Authorship in eighteenth-century Aberdeen often functioned differently than in London and Edinburgh. The Aberdeen model of authorship relied heavily on an intricate network of booksellers, patrons, readers, and critics involved in preparing a text to be consumed by the reading public; yet the prevailing narrative of the author as rising to “inspired genius” disallows for this network. The authorial career of poet Alexander Ross and his friend/mentorship with philosopher James Beattie offers a useful case study of the Aberdeen model—especially when approached through a lens of book history to consider the material practices surrounding the production of a literary work. Both Ross’s career in particular and eighteenth-century Aberdeen offer ways to historicize the concept of the “inspired genius” emerging at the end of the eighteenth century. Therefore, addressing the authorial careers of Ross and Beattie opens up new avenues for discussion, both of these poets in particular and of discourses of authorial practices in general.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应“朋友的要求”出版:亚历山大·罗斯和詹姆斯·比蒂在十八世纪阿伯丁的作者网络
18世纪阿伯丁的作者身份通常与伦敦和爱丁堡的不同。阿伯丁的作者模式在很大程度上依赖于一个错综复杂的网络,包括书商、赞助人、读者和评论家,这些人都参与了准备供读者消费的文本的工作;然而,将作者描述为“灵感天才”的主流叙事不允许这种网络存在。诗人亚历山大·罗斯(Alexander Ross)和他的朋友兼哲学家詹姆斯·比蒂(James Beattie)的写作生涯为阿伯丁模式提供了一个有用的案例研究——尤其是当通过书籍历史的视角来考虑文学作品创作过程中的材料实践时。罗斯的职业生涯和18世纪的阿伯丁都提供了将18世纪末出现的“灵感天才”概念历史化的方法。因此,探讨罗斯和贝蒂的写作生涯为讨论开辟了新的途径,特别是这两位诗人,以及一般意义上的写作实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Better place no wit can finde”: The Compiler as Author in Early Modern Verse Miscellanies “Unembedded, Disappeared”: “As Truthful as Our Notion of the Past Can Ever Be”: William Edward Daniel Ross’s Transformation into a Popular Fiction Novelist, 1962-1967 Writing Back against Canada’s Fictive Ethnicity:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1