Revisión sistemática de las diferentes técnicas quirúrgicas de contracepción en gatas

IF 0.3 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES Abanico Veterinario Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.21929/abavet2021.27
Toledo-Valdez Cielo, Rivera-Barreno Ramón, T. Ilse, Bustos-Varela Jocelyn, García-Herrera Ricardo, Rodríguez-Alarcón Carlos
{"title":"Revisión sistemática de las diferentes técnicas quirúrgicas de contracepción en gatas","authors":"Toledo-Valdez Cielo, Rivera-Barreno Ramón, T. Ilse, Bustos-Varela Jocelyn, García-Herrera Ricardo, Rodríguez-Alarcón Carlos","doi":"10.21929/abavet2021.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the veterinary clinic, contraceptive surgery is the most commonly performed surgery in female cats. However, it is not established which surgical technique is the most appropriate. In order to reduce postoperative pain, recovery time, surgery time and technical ease for the surgeon, different surgical techniques and variations of these techniques have been described. This has created the dilemma of performing ovariohysterectomy versus oophorectomy; type of approach: midline, lateral or laparoscopic; and method of ovarian pedicle ligation: harmonic scalpel, plastic and titanium clips, bipolar electrosurgical unit, pedicle knot and traditional ligation. With this in mind, with the objective of establishing which is the most adequate contraceptive surgery in female cats and supported by evidence-based medicine, a systematic review was carried out. Using Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed and SciELO search engines, with the following variables to be evaluated: pain, time and technical difficulty. It was found that there is little evidence to establish the superiority of any surgical technique over another and that the choice of surgical technique should be made based on the patient, the surgeon's skills and the availability of materials.","PeriodicalId":7052,"journal":{"name":"Abanico Veterinario","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abanico Veterinario","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21929/abavet2021.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the veterinary clinic, contraceptive surgery is the most commonly performed surgery in female cats. However, it is not established which surgical technique is the most appropriate. In order to reduce postoperative pain, recovery time, surgery time and technical ease for the surgeon, different surgical techniques and variations of these techniques have been described. This has created the dilemma of performing ovariohysterectomy versus oophorectomy; type of approach: midline, lateral or laparoscopic; and method of ovarian pedicle ligation: harmonic scalpel, plastic and titanium clips, bipolar electrosurgical unit, pedicle knot and traditional ligation. With this in mind, with the objective of establishing which is the most adequate contraceptive surgery in female cats and supported by evidence-based medicine, a systematic review was carried out. Using Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed and SciELO search engines, with the following variables to be evaluated: pain, time and technical difficulty. It was found that there is little evidence to establish the superiority of any surgical technique over another and that the choice of surgical technique should be made based on the patient, the surgeon's skills and the availability of materials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统回顾猫不同的外科避孕技术
在兽医诊所,避孕手术是对母猫进行的最常见的手术。然而,目前还没有确定哪种手术技术是最合适的。为了减少术后疼痛、恢复时间、手术时间和外科医生的技术便利性,不同的手术技术和这些技术的变化已经被描述。这就造成了进行卵巢子宫切除术还是卵巢切除术的困境;入路类型:中线、外侧或腹腔镜;卵巢蒂结扎方法:谐波刀、塑料钛夹、双极电刀、蒂结、传统结扎。考虑到这一点,在循证医学的支持下,为了确定哪一种是雌性猫最适当的避孕手术,进行了一项系统评价。使用谷歌Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed和SciELO搜索引擎,评估以下变量:疼痛,时间和技术难度。研究发现,几乎没有证据表明任何一种手术技术比另一种手术技术优越,手术技术的选择应根据患者、外科医生的技术和材料的可用性来确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abanico Veterinario
Abanico Veterinario VETERINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
La ubre de la cabra: mecanismo de secreción láctea y síntesis de proteínas/grasas Variación de la prevalencia de Varroa, Nosema y Acarapis en dos regiones del estado de Campeche, México Frecuencia de Campylobacter fetus en bovinos sementales en la zona centro de Tamaulipas México Un coágulo inusual en la vejiga en un perro Suplementación de aminoácidos funcionales en dietas de cerdos y su impacto en el intestino
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1