Reset and Go: The Unitary Patent System Post-Brexit

T. Jaeger
{"title":"Reset and Go: The Unitary Patent System Post-Brexit","authors":"T. Jaeger","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2884671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patent law in Europe is characterized by a historic rivalry between EU and non-EU patent systems. The EU for decades could not establish a working, attractive and balanced system of its own. After the failure of its well-tailored 2009 model, the Commission was determined to push ahead with the patent plans even at the cost of compromise that severely damaged the functionality of the patent system. The result was the 2012 Unitary Patent Package, which has since been cleared twice by the CJEU in spite of severe doubts concerning EU law compatibility. Just as the race seemed to near finish line, the June 2016 Brexit referendum put a spoke in the EU’s wheel. Against the backdrop of a brief review of the systemic rivalry, this paper recounts and assesses the CJEU’s recent case law on the legality of the UP Package, the implications of the Brexit vote and the prospects, if any, for the unitary patent post-Brexit.","PeriodicalId":44949,"journal":{"name":"IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW","volume":"48 1","pages":"254-285"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/ssrn.2884671","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2884671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Patent law in Europe is characterized by a historic rivalry between EU and non-EU patent systems. The EU for decades could not establish a working, attractive and balanced system of its own. After the failure of its well-tailored 2009 model, the Commission was determined to push ahead with the patent plans even at the cost of compromise that severely damaged the functionality of the patent system. The result was the 2012 Unitary Patent Package, which has since been cleared twice by the CJEU in spite of severe doubts concerning EU law compatibility. Just as the race seemed to near finish line, the June 2016 Brexit referendum put a spoke in the EU’s wheel. Against the backdrop of a brief review of the systemic rivalry, this paper recounts and assesses the CJEU’s recent case law on the legality of the UP Package, the implications of the Brexit vote and the prospects, if any, for the unitary patent post-Brexit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新开始:英国脱欧后的统一专利制度
欧洲专利法的特点是欧盟和非欧盟专利制度之间的历史竞争。几十年来,欧盟一直无法建立起一个有效的、有吸引力的、平衡的体系。在精心设计的2009年模式失败后,欧盟委员会决心推进专利计划,即使要付出严重损害专利制度功能的妥协代价。其结果是2012年的统一专利一揽子计划,尽管对欧盟法律的兼容性存在严重质疑,但该计划已两次获得欧洲法院的批准。就在这场竞赛似乎接近终点线时,2016年6月的英国脱欧公投给欧盟的车轮带来了冲击。在简要回顾系统竞争的背景下,本文叙述并评估了欧洲法院最近关于UP一揽子计划合法性的判例法,英国脱欧投票的影响以及英国脱欧后统一专利的前景(如果有的话)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
30.00%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: The International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (IIC) is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition. Founded in 1970, IIC is one of the most respected journals in the fields of intellectual property and competition law, presenting contributions with the highest standards of academic research. IIC publishes research on the most significant developments in IP and competition law from around the world. Our aim is to provide a European perspective on these important topics to an international audience. The journal adopts a multidisciplinary approach and offers a platform for opposing ideas, providing for rich debate on a host of current IP and competition law issues. The journal’s central feature is high-quality authored materials including articles, editorials, opinions, reports, case notes and book reviews. We also translate and publish the leading decisions from jurisdictions worldwide, including many non-mainstream jurisdictions. The quality of IIC is grounded on a more than 50-year history of publication. Each volume builds on this tradition of academic excellence. Our established foundation provides a unique platform upon which our readers are able to research and explore emerging developments in IP and competition law in the decades to come.
期刊最新文献
Intellectual Property and the Constitutional Court of South Africa: Lessons from the Deployment of Adjudicative Strategies Correction: “Speaker Photo [Lautsprecherfoto]” Generative AI and Author Remuneration A Human Right to Ever-Stronger Protection? The Essential Facilities Doctrine, Intellectual Property Rights, and Access to Big Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1