Monopoly and the Mandate of Canada Post

IF 1.2 1区 社会学 Q1 LAW Yale Journal on Regulation Pub Date : 2001-11-02 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.289390
J. Sidak, Daniel F. Spulber
{"title":"Monopoly and the Mandate of Canada Post","authors":"J. Sidak, Daniel F. Spulber","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.289390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mail delivery is one of the few economic activities that has avoided the wave of deregulation and privatization that has swept network industries over the last few decades. This Article examines several questions regarding the business activities of Canada Post Corporation in a competitive environment. What should be the appropriate mandate of Canada Post? If Canada Post is a natural monopoly, what form of regulation best serves Canadian consumers? If Canada Post's delivery of letter mail is not a natural monopoly, what basis exists for retaining Canada Post's current statutory monopoly? What potential exists for Canada Post to abuse its statutory monopoly-and other statutory privileges and immunities-to compete unfairly against efficient private suppliers of postal services? Part I of this Article outlines the regulatory and institutional setting in which Canada Post operates, including the nature and extent of Canada Post's legal monopoly. Part II demonstrates why technological justifications for the postal monopoly are no longer valid. Part III establishes that public provisions of the full range of postal services is no longer needed. Part IV explains how postal pricing and regulation can cause competitive problems for private firms because of incorrect measurement and misallocation of attributable costs and because of the potential to misuse Ramsey pricing principles. Part V presents four options that are available to the Canadian Parliament for addressing the problem of protecting efficient competition from the postal monopoly.","PeriodicalId":46196,"journal":{"name":"Yale Journal on Regulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.289390","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale Journal on Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.289390","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mail delivery is one of the few economic activities that has avoided the wave of deregulation and privatization that has swept network industries over the last few decades. This Article examines several questions regarding the business activities of Canada Post Corporation in a competitive environment. What should be the appropriate mandate of Canada Post? If Canada Post is a natural monopoly, what form of regulation best serves Canadian consumers? If Canada Post's delivery of letter mail is not a natural monopoly, what basis exists for retaining Canada Post's current statutory monopoly? What potential exists for Canada Post to abuse its statutory monopoly-and other statutory privileges and immunities-to compete unfairly against efficient private suppliers of postal services? Part I of this Article outlines the regulatory and institutional setting in which Canada Post operates, including the nature and extent of Canada Post's legal monopoly. Part II demonstrates why technological justifications for the postal monopoly are no longer valid. Part III establishes that public provisions of the full range of postal services is no longer needed. Part IV explains how postal pricing and regulation can cause competitive problems for private firms because of incorrect measurement and misallocation of attributable costs and because of the potential to misuse Ramsey pricing principles. Part V presents four options that are available to the Canadian Parliament for addressing the problem of protecting efficient competition from the postal monopoly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
垄断和加拿大邮政的授权
在过去几十年席卷网络行业的放松管制和私有化浪潮中,邮件递送是为数不多的几项经济活动之一。本文考察了加拿大邮政公司在竞争环境下的商业活动的几个问题。加拿大邮政的适当任务是什么?如果加拿大邮政是一个自然垄断,什么样的监管形式最适合加拿大的消费者?如果加拿大邮政的信件递送业务不是自然垄断,那么加拿大邮政保留其法定垄断地位的依据是什么?加拿大邮政滥用其法定垄断地位——以及其他法定特权和豁免权——与高效的私人邮政服务供应商进行不公平竞争的可能性有多大?本文第一部分概述了加拿大邮政运作的监管和机构设置,包括加拿大邮政合法垄断的性质和程度。第二部分说明了为什么邮政垄断的技术理由不再有效。第三部分规定不再需要公共提供全面的邮政服务。第四部分解释了邮政定价和监管如何由于可归属成本的不正确计量和分配不当以及滥用拉姆齐定价原则的可能性而导致私营公司的竞争问题。第五部分提出了加拿大议会可用于解决保护有效竞争免受邮政垄断的问题的四种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FOIA’s Common Law Empiricism and Privacy Policies in the Restatement of Consumer Contract Law New Tech v. New Deal: Fintech as a Systemic Phenomenon Presidential Administration in a Regime of Separated Powers: An Analysis of Recent American Experience Eliminating Conflicts of Interests in Banks: The Significance of the Volcker Rule
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1