Legal Framework for the Procurement of Public-Private Partnerships – An Australian Perspective in the European Union Context

Marta Andhov
{"title":"Legal Framework for the Procurement of Public-Private Partnerships – An Australian Perspective in the European Union Context","authors":"Marta Andhov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2910909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on an assumption that in its current shape the EU public procurement framework is a highly regulated and rigid system, in which delivery of successful PPP contracts may be hindered, in this paper it will be considered, whether there could be a different, more beneficial way in which to award PPP contracts. The question is whether an exclusion of the PPP award contract from the Public Sector Directive could be an adequate solution. It is worth considering, whether such a change would provide the flexibility needed and whether, at the same time, it could lead to a lack of legal certainty and hinder the development of EU integration.In order to answer the posed questions the author will apply a general systemic approach. The characteristics of this approach is to introduce and compare – at an overall level – the highly regulated European procurement system to another system which has an absolutely different approach towards procurement in order to investigate, whether an exclusion of PPP contracts from public procurement directives in the EU could be beneficial.","PeriodicalId":82658,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian studies in law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian studies in law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2910909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on an assumption that in its current shape the EU public procurement framework is a highly regulated and rigid system, in which delivery of successful PPP contracts may be hindered, in this paper it will be considered, whether there could be a different, more beneficial way in which to award PPP contracts. The question is whether an exclusion of the PPP award contract from the Public Sector Directive could be an adequate solution. It is worth considering, whether such a change would provide the flexibility needed and whether, at the same time, it could lead to a lack of legal certainty and hinder the development of EU integration.In order to answer the posed questions the author will apply a general systemic approach. The characteristics of this approach is to introduce and compare – at an overall level – the highly regulated European procurement system to another system which has an absolutely different approach towards procurement in order to investigate, whether an exclusion of PPP contracts from public procurement directives in the EU could be beneficial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采购公私伙伴关系的法律框架——欧盟背景下澳大利亚的视角
基于目前欧盟公共采购框架是一个高度监管和僵化的系统的假设,在这种情况下,成功的PPP合同的交付可能会受到阻碍,本文将考虑是否可能有一种不同的、更有益的方式来授予PPP合同。问题是将PPP合同排除在公共部门指令之外是否是一个适当的解决方案。值得考虑的是,这种变化是否会提供所需的灵活性,同时,它是否会导致缺乏法律确定性,阻碍欧盟一体化的发展。为了回答所提出的问题,作者将采用一般的系统方法。这种方法的特点是在整体层面上,将高度管制的欧洲采购系统与另一种采购方式完全不同的系统进行介绍和比较,以调查在欧盟的公共采购指令中排除PPP合同是否有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Regular Powers are No Longer Enough” – Checks and Balances in Declaring a State of Emergency according to the Constitution of Finland Is There a Swedish Constitutional Exceptionalism? A Legal Historical Approach to the Rules on the Distribution of Legislative Competence and the Question of Private or Public Europeanisation The Council of Europe in Defence of Democracy. Some Reflections Following the Reykjavik Summit 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1