{"title":"Gjuro Ferrich’s Periegesis orae Rhacusanae (1803) as a Travel Polemic","authors":"W. Bracewell","doi":"10.21857/Y26KECVKZ9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gjuro Ferrich’s Periegesis orae Rhacusanae (1803) has been \nread as a description of Ragusa’s territories, as a sarcastic commentary on \nRagusan manners and morals, and as a poetic paraphrase of physiocratic \nideas. Now a hitherto unstudied letter from the author suggests that it should \nalso be read as a ‘counter-travelogue’, a polemical reply to a foreign account \nof Ragusa. This study sets Ferrich’s Periegesis in context, examining its \nrelationship to Francesco Maria Appendini’s Notizie (1802-03); the different \nmodels Ferrich may have drawn upon in framing his text; and the insights into \nparticular images provided by a polemical reply to Ferrich composed by \nMarin Zlatarich. Ferrich’s Periegesis emerges as a ‘discreet’ polemic, with \ndifferent messages addressed to its domestic readers on the one hand and its \nforeign audience on the other.","PeriodicalId":37889,"journal":{"name":"Dubrovnik Annals","volume":"19 1","pages":"99-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dubrovnik Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21857/Y26KECVKZ9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gjuro Ferrich’s Periegesis orae Rhacusanae (1803) has been
read as a description of Ragusa’s territories, as a sarcastic commentary on
Ragusan manners and morals, and as a poetic paraphrase of physiocratic
ideas. Now a hitherto unstudied letter from the author suggests that it should
also be read as a ‘counter-travelogue’, a polemical reply to a foreign account
of Ragusa. This study sets Ferrich’s Periegesis in context, examining its
relationship to Francesco Maria Appendini’s Notizie (1802-03); the different
models Ferrich may have drawn upon in framing his text; and the insights into
particular images provided by a polemical reply to Ferrich composed by
Marin Zlatarich. Ferrich’s Periegesis emerges as a ‘discreet’ polemic, with
different messages addressed to its domestic readers on the one hand and its
foreign audience on the other.
Gjuro Ferrich的《ragusanae的历史》(1803)被解读为对拉古萨领土的描述,对拉古萨礼仪和道德的讽刺评论,以及对重农主义思想的诗化解释。现在,来自作者的一封迄今未被研究的信表明,它也应该被解读为“反游记”,是对拉古萨的外国叙述的一份有争议的回复。本研究将Ferrich的《Periegesis》置于语境中,考察其与Francesco Maria Appendini的《Notizie》(1802-03)的关系;费里奇在构建他的文本时可能采用的不同模式;以及马林·兹拉塔里奇(Marin Zlatarich)对费里奇(Ferrich)的一篇有争议的回复所提供的对特定图像的见解。费里希的《Periegesis》是一场“谨慎的”论战,一方面向国内读者传达了不同的信息,另一方面向外国读者传达了不同的信息。
期刊介绍:
Dubrovnik Annals is an English language annual published by the Institute for Historical Sciences of CASA in Dubrovnik. The journal has been created in order to present the most important results of scholarship on the Republic of Dubrovnik (Ragusa) to the international audiences. The Annals publish studies pertaining to various humanities and social sciences, as well as reviews of books, providing an overview of the international scholarship dedicated to the history of Dubrovnik.