'Since Time Immemorial': A Story of Common Law Jurisdiction, Native Title and the Case of Tanistry

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Melbourne University Law Review Pub Date : 2002-09-15 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.3037780
S. Dorsett
{"title":"'Since Time Immemorial': A Story of Common Law Jurisdiction, Native Title and the Case of Tanistry","authors":"S. Dorsett","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3037780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 10 th anniversary year of the decision in Mabo, this article offers one possible account of the relationship between native title and the common law The article provides a description of this relationship, based on an account of common law jurisdiction and the ways in which the common law historically used the concept of jurisdiction in order to supplant other sites of adjudication and authority. The article traces the jurisdictional story of the common law,from its origins as one of many decentralised legal spaces, through the important first colonial context of Ireland,to the new settlement of New South Wales, and the first encounters with 'the natives'. It then examines the decisions in Mabo, Wik and others, and concludes that in 'recognising 'and constructing the interest of native title, the common law relied on the same techniques which characterised its earlier encounters with the 'other' in the English domestic and Irish colonial contexts. It is only by understanding the way in which native title has come to be at common law that we can explore its possibilities and limitations as a vehicle for justice.","PeriodicalId":46300,"journal":{"name":"Melbourne University Law Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"32-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.3037780","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melbourne University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3037780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

In the 10 th anniversary year of the decision in Mabo, this article offers one possible account of the relationship between native title and the common law The article provides a description of this relationship, based on an account of common law jurisdiction and the ways in which the common law historically used the concept of jurisdiction in order to supplant other sites of adjudication and authority. The article traces the jurisdictional story of the common law,from its origins as one of many decentralised legal spaces, through the important first colonial context of Ireland,to the new settlement of New South Wales, and the first encounters with 'the natives'. It then examines the decisions in Mabo, Wik and others, and concludes that in 'recognising 'and constructing the interest of native title, the common law relied on the same techniques which characterised its earlier encounters with the 'other' in the English domestic and Irish colonial contexts. It is only by understanding the way in which native title has come to be at common law that we can explore its possibilities and limitations as a vehicle for justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“自古以来”:一个关于普通法管辖权、土著所有权和Tanistry案例的故事
在马博案判决10周年之际,本文提供了一种可能的解释土著所有权与普通法之间关系的方法。本文基于对普通法管辖权的描述以及普通法在历史上使用管辖权概念以取代其他裁决和权威场所的方式,对这种关系进行了描述。这篇文章追溯了普通法的管辖权故事,从它作为许多分散的法律空间之一的起源,通过爱尔兰重要的第一个殖民背景,到新南威尔士的新定居点,以及与“当地人”的第一次接触。然后考察了Mabo, Wik和其他案件的判决,并得出结论,在“承认”和构建土著所有权利益方面,普通法依赖于其早期在英国国内和爱尔兰殖民背景下与“他者”相遇的相同技术。只有通过理解土著所有权在普通法中形成的方式,我们才能探索其作为司法工具的可能性和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Assessing Refugee Protection Claims at Australian Airports: The Gap Between Law, Policy, and Practice Tricked into marriage Is a cause of action a castle? Statutory choses in action as property and s51(xxxi) of the Constitution The Protection of Stateless Persons in Australian Law: The Rationale for a Statelessness Determination Procedure Non-consensual porn and the responsibilities of online intermediaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1