Clarification of synonymy for the common moth‐vine Araujia sericifera (Asclepiadaceae)

IF 2 2区 生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Taxon Pub Date : 1992-11-01 DOI:10.2307/1222403
P. Forster, P. Bruyns
{"title":"Clarification of synonymy for the common moth‐vine Araujia sericifera (Asclepiadaceae)","authors":"P. Forster, P. Bruyns","doi":"10.2307/1222403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A species of Araujia Brot. (Fig. 1), originating from South America, is commonly naturalized in temperate and subtropical regions around the world such as North America (Spellman & Gunn, 1976), Australia (Kleinschmidt & Johnson, 1979; Pearce, 1986) and southern Africa (Dyer, 1975). In southern Africa (Henderson & Anderson, 1966) and in North America (Spellman & Gunn, 1976) it has been called A. sericifera Brot., whereas in Australia it is called A. hortorum Fourn. (Kleinschmidt & Johnson, 1979; Pearce, 1986). Several authors (e.g. Spellman & Gunn, 1976) have continued to use the incorrect spelling \"sericofera\" which is an orthographic error (Art. 73). It would appear that none of these names has ever been formally typified. Consequently, in this paper several names in Araujia and Physianthus are lectotypified and synonymy is established. The common moth catcher or moth vine was first described and figured by Brotero (1817). In this paper he established the unispecific genus Araujia based on material from Peru. It was illustrated with two plates: t. 4 showing a flowering branch and t. 5 giving floral dissections and fruits. No mention was made of type material. In choosing a lectotype for Brotero's name we consulted the herbaria LISU and MO, both of which have material from his herbarium (Stafleu & Cowan, 1976). No relevant material is present at MO (J. C. Solomon, personal communication, 1991). According to A. Escudeiro (personal communication, 1991), a specimen of A. sericifera is present at LISU that was collected by Valorado and studied by Brotero. No indication was given if this specimen was studied by Brotero prior or subsequent to his publication of A. sericifera. Several subsequent enquiries to LISU have been unanswered and the nomenclatural status of this putative specimen remains unresolved. Brotero's t. 4 is clear and correlates well with the accompanying description and the widely naturalized taxon. It is thus selected as the lectotype for A. sericifera Brot. This same species next appeared in Martius (1824a) who was apparently unaware of Brotero's paper and described a new genus Physianthus with the species P albens C. Martius, based on material from Brazil. Once again no type material was mentioned,","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"41 1","pages":"746-749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1222403","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taxon","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1222403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

A species of Araujia Brot. (Fig. 1), originating from South America, is commonly naturalized in temperate and subtropical regions around the world such as North America (Spellman & Gunn, 1976), Australia (Kleinschmidt & Johnson, 1979; Pearce, 1986) and southern Africa (Dyer, 1975). In southern Africa (Henderson & Anderson, 1966) and in North America (Spellman & Gunn, 1976) it has been called A. sericifera Brot., whereas in Australia it is called A. hortorum Fourn. (Kleinschmidt & Johnson, 1979; Pearce, 1986). Several authors (e.g. Spellman & Gunn, 1976) have continued to use the incorrect spelling "sericofera" which is an orthographic error (Art. 73). It would appear that none of these names has ever been formally typified. Consequently, in this paper several names in Araujia and Physianthus are lectotypified and synonymy is established. The common moth catcher or moth vine was first described and figured by Brotero (1817). In this paper he established the unispecific genus Araujia based on material from Peru. It was illustrated with two plates: t. 4 showing a flowering branch and t. 5 giving floral dissections and fruits. No mention was made of type material. In choosing a lectotype for Brotero's name we consulted the herbaria LISU and MO, both of which have material from his herbarium (Stafleu & Cowan, 1976). No relevant material is present at MO (J. C. Solomon, personal communication, 1991). According to A. Escudeiro (personal communication, 1991), a specimen of A. sericifera is present at LISU that was collected by Valorado and studied by Brotero. No indication was given if this specimen was studied by Brotero prior or subsequent to his publication of A. sericifera. Several subsequent enquiries to LISU have been unanswered and the nomenclatural status of this putative specimen remains unresolved. Brotero's t. 4 is clear and correlates well with the accompanying description and the widely naturalized taxon. It is thus selected as the lectotype for A. sericifera Brot. This same species next appeared in Martius (1824a) who was apparently unaware of Brotero's paper and described a new genus Physianthus with the species P albens C. Martius, based on material from Brazil. Once again no type material was mentioned,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普通蛾科绢金蛾的同义澄清
一种白桦属植物。(图1),原产于南美洲,在世界各地的温带和亚热带地区,如北美(Spellman & Gunn, 1976)、澳大利亚(Kleinschmidt & Johnson, 1979;Pearce, 1986)和南部非洲(Dyer, 1975)。在南部非洲(Henderson & Anderson, 1966)和北美(Spellman & Gunn, 1976),它被称为A. sericifera Brot。而在澳大利亚,它被称为A. hortorum Fourn。(Kleinschmidt & Johnson, 1979;皮尔斯,1986)。一些作者(如Spellman & Gunn, 1976)继续使用错误的拼写“sericofera”,这是一个拼写错误(第73条)。这些名字似乎都没有被正式归类过。因此,本文对仙姑属和仙姑属的几个名称进行了分型,并建立了同义关系。普通的捕蛾器或蛾藤最早是由布罗特罗(1817年)描述和描绘的。在这篇论文中,他根据来自秘鲁的材料建立了Araujia属。它用两张图来说明:图4显示了一个开花的树枝,图5给出了花的解剖和果实。没有提到铅字材料。在为Brotero的名字选择类型时,我们参考了植物标本馆LISU和MO,这两个标本馆都有他的植物标本馆的材料(Stafleu & Cowan, 1976)。MO没有相关材料(j.c. Solomon, personal communication, 1991)。根据a . Escudeiro(个人通讯,1991)的说法,Valorado收集并由Brotero研究的绢叶蝉标本目前存在于LISU。没有说明这个标本是在Brotero发表A. sericifera之前还是之后被研究的。随后对LISU的几次询问都没有得到答复,这个假定标本的命名地位仍然没有得到解决。Brotero的t. 4是清晰的,并且与随附的描述和广泛归化的分类群有很好的相关性。因此,它被选为蚕蛹的选型。同样的物种随后出现在Martius (1824a)身上,他显然不知道Brotero的论文,并根据巴西的材料描述了一个新的属Physianthus和种P albens C. Martius。同样没有提到类型材料,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Taxon
Taxon 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: TAXON is the bi-monthly journal of the International Association for Plant Taxonomy and is devoted to systematic and evolutionary biology with emphasis on plants and fungi. It is published bimonthly by the International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature, c/o Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-845 23 Bratislava, SLOVAKIA. Details of page charges are given in the Guidelines for authors. Papers will be reviewed by at least two specialists.
期刊最新文献
IAPT chromosome data 42 Morphological and molecular analyses consistently support the existence of two species under Hypochaeris achyrophorus (Asteraceae, Cichorieae) Biogeographic, climatic, morphological, cytological and molecular data reveal a new diploid species from China in the genus Xanthocyparis (Cupressaceae) Species delimitation in Xanthium sect. Acanthoxanthium (Heliantheae, Asteraceae) and the neglected species Xanthium argenteum (3050) Proposal to reject the name Cistus pilosus (Cistaceae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1