The Ecological Origins of the Yan'an Way

Pauline B. Keating
{"title":"The Ecological Origins of the Yan'an Way","authors":"Pauline B. Keating","doi":"10.2307/2949830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 'Yan'an Way' is commonly understood as the set of mobilization strategies which emerged from the Chinese Communist Party's rectification drive of 1941-42. In the view of many analysts, these strategies laid the foundation for the Communists' victory in 1949. Mark Selden's pathbreaking 1971 study argued that the Yan'an Way had its origins in a populist 'impulse' within the Communist movement, an impulse which resurfaced among the Party leadership in response to the crises of 1940-41: it was an approach to rural development 'built on egalitarian foundations of participation and community' and was designed to create 'new forms of community'; itwas a strategy epitomized by the 'mass line' a 'mobilization style of leadership' which rejected elitism and bureaucratism.1 The Yan'an Way, Selden argued, was embodied in a series of mass campaigns launched by the Party after 1942, especially the great production drive of 1943-44. More recent scholarship challenges this interpretation on two fronts. The first is its heavy emphasis on the populist features of the Party's post-1942 mobilization methods. Most scholars now agree that any populism in the Yan'an Way was, at best, just one side of a multi-faceted strategy, and that he authoritarianism and state-strengthening ambitions of Communist mobilizers, even in the halcyon Yan'an years, are fairly obvious.2 Secondly, Selden's","PeriodicalId":85646,"journal":{"name":"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung","volume":"1 1","pages":"123 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2949830","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2949830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The 'Yan'an Way' is commonly understood as the set of mobilization strategies which emerged from the Chinese Communist Party's rectification drive of 1941-42. In the view of many analysts, these strategies laid the foundation for the Communists' victory in 1949. Mark Selden's pathbreaking 1971 study argued that the Yan'an Way had its origins in a populist 'impulse' within the Communist movement, an impulse which resurfaced among the Party leadership in response to the crises of 1940-41: it was an approach to rural development 'built on egalitarian foundations of participation and community' and was designed to create 'new forms of community'; itwas a strategy epitomized by the 'mass line' a 'mobilization style of leadership' which rejected elitism and bureaucratism.1 The Yan'an Way, Selden argued, was embodied in a series of mass campaigns launched by the Party after 1942, especially the great production drive of 1943-44. More recent scholarship challenges this interpretation on two fronts. The first is its heavy emphasis on the populist features of the Party's post-1942 mobilization methods. Most scholars now agree that any populism in the Yan'an Way was, at best, just one side of a multi-faceted strategy, and that he authoritarianism and state-strengthening ambitions of Communist mobilizers, even in the halcyon Yan'an years, are fairly obvious.2 Secondly, Selden's
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
延安之道的生态起源
“延安方式”通常被理解为中国共产党在1941年至1942年的整风运动中出现的一套动员战略。在许多分析人士看来,这些策略为共产党在1949年的胜利奠定了基础。马克·塞尔登(Mark Selden) 1971年开创性的研究认为,延安之道起源于共产主义运动中的民粹主义“冲动”,这一冲动在共产党领导层中重新出现,以应对1940-41年的危机:它是一种“建立在参与和社区的平等主义基础上”的农村发展方法,旨在创造“新形式的社区”;这是一种以“群众路线”为缩影的战略,一种拒绝精英主义和官僚主义的“动员式领导”塞尔登认为,延安之道体现在1942年以后党发起的一系列群众运动中,特别是1943年至1944年的大规模生产运动。最近的学术研究从两个方面挑战了这种解释。首先,它着重强调了1942年后共产党动员方法的民粹主义特征。大多数学者现在都同意,延安方式的任何民粹主义,充其量只是多方面战略的一个方面,共产主义动员者的威权主义和加强国家的野心,即使在平静的延安时期,也是相当明显的其次,塞尔登的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Back Matter Intersectoral Resource Flows and China's Economic Development.Yuming Sheng Taoist Ritual and Popular Cults of Southeast China.Kenneth Dean The Changing World of Mongolia's Nomads.Melvyn C. Goldstein , Cynthia M. Beall China Turned On: Television, Reform, and Resistance.James Lull
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1