Democracy or Dictatorship?: A Response to Gordon White

Barrett L. McCormick
{"title":"Democracy or Dictatorship?: A Response to Gordon White","authors":"Barrett L. McCormick","doi":"10.2307/2949902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How can China best establish a prosperous democracy? I agree with Gordon White on most of the important issues. We both believe that democracy is highly desirable and feasible in China. The debate about democracy in China often centres on the question of whether or not Chinese culture is compatible with democracy, but that will not be at issue here, as both Gordon and I believe it is. We also agree that despite 'even because of' its economic success, the current government faces political problems so severe that fundamental political reform is an urgent necessity. We agree too that legitimacy is one of the most pressing political issues. We also share the grave concern that if political reform is mishandled, it could result in chaos and violence; or luan, as Chinese commentators are wont to say. Both of us view avoidance of this as a fundamental priority. Finally, neither of us believes that there is any quick or easy means by which China can establish a stable democracy or that democracy is a panacea for all other problems. The difference between us, then, is only on the matter of which means might best reach the end we both desire and avoid the dangers we both fear. Gordon White seeks to be a 'realist' and recommends a gradual transition from a totalistic regime to an authoritarian regime to a democratic regime so as to preserve as much continuity and stability as possible. He fears the results of an early attempt at democracy. His proposal calls for a moderate authoritarian government composed of enlightened leaders that would from its inception be committed to","PeriodicalId":85646,"journal":{"name":"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung","volume":"1 1","pages":"95 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2949902","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2949902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

How can China best establish a prosperous democracy? I agree with Gordon White on most of the important issues. We both believe that democracy is highly desirable and feasible in China. The debate about democracy in China often centres on the question of whether or not Chinese culture is compatible with democracy, but that will not be at issue here, as both Gordon and I believe it is. We also agree that despite 'even because of' its economic success, the current government faces political problems so severe that fundamental political reform is an urgent necessity. We agree too that legitimacy is one of the most pressing political issues. We also share the grave concern that if political reform is mishandled, it could result in chaos and violence; or luan, as Chinese commentators are wont to say. Both of us view avoidance of this as a fundamental priority. Finally, neither of us believes that there is any quick or easy means by which China can establish a stable democracy or that democracy is a panacea for all other problems. The difference between us, then, is only on the matter of which means might best reach the end we both desire and avoid the dangers we both fear. Gordon White seeks to be a 'realist' and recommends a gradual transition from a totalistic regime to an authoritarian regime to a democratic regime so as to preserve as much continuity and stability as possible. He fears the results of an early attempt at democracy. His proposal calls for a moderate authoritarian government composed of enlightened leaders that would from its inception be committed to
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民主还是独裁?:对戈登·怀特的回应
中国如何才能最好地建立繁荣的民主?在大多数重要问题上,我同意戈登·怀特的观点。我们都相信民主在中国是非常可取和可行的。关于中国民主的辩论通常集中在中国文化是否与民主相容的问题上,但这不是这里的问题,正如戈登和我所相信的那样。我们还同意,尽管“正因为”中国经济取得了成功,但现政府面临的政治问题非常严重,迫切需要进行根本性的政治改革。我们也同意合法性是最紧迫的政治问题之一。我们同样严重关切,如果政治改革处理不当,可能导致混乱和暴力;或者像中国评论员习惯说的那样。我们双方都认为避免这种情况是最基本的优先事项。最后,我们都不相信有什么捷径可以让中国建立一个稳定的民主,也不相信民主是解决所有其他问题的灵丹妙药。因此,我们之间的区别仅仅在于哪种方式能最好地达到我们都渴望的目的,避免我们都害怕的危险。戈登·怀特寻求成为一个“现实主义者”,并建议从极权政权到威权政权再到民主政权的逐步过渡,以尽可能保持连续性和稳定性。他担心早期民主尝试的结果。他的提议要求建立一个温和的威权政府,由开明的领导人组成,从一开始就致力于此
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Back Matter Intersectoral Resource Flows and China's Economic Development.Yuming Sheng Taoist Ritual and Popular Cults of Southeast China.Kenneth Dean The Changing World of Mongolia's Nomads.Melvyn C. Goldstein , Cynthia M. Beall China Turned On: Television, Reform, and Resistance.James Lull
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1