Criminal Justice Outcomes of Suicide by Cop Survivors

K. Weiss
{"title":"Criminal Justice Outcomes of Suicide by Cop Survivors","authors":"K. Weiss","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4200670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of suicide by cop (SbC) is of interest to psychiatrists, law enforcement professionals, lawyers, and citizens. It is a form of provoked homicide arising from a wish to die. Those who attempt SbC experience more mental illness, substance use, and recent trauma than the general population. This article examines those who attempt SbC and survive the encounters. SbC survivors who threaten or harm police or others may be charged with crimes such as weapons possession, aggravated assault, murder or attempted murder of an officer. The formulation of a provocative act, however, frustrates attempts at defenses based on mental state, resulting in few requests for expert testimony. Few data exist on how these individuals fare in court. Appellate cases in which defendants attempted to introduce evidence of SbC illustrate great variability in adjudication. Psychiatric defenses, such as diminished capacity and insanity, are usually inapplicable or unsuccessful because intent and knowledge of wrongfulness are implied in the provocative act. Diversion of SbC defendants into mental health courts is rare because of firearms use against police. The author argues that criminal justice ignores SbC survivors’ mental health and recommends application of therapeutic jurisprudence to give full expression of SbC dynamics.","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":"51 1","pages":"390 - 400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4200670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of suicide by cop (SbC) is of interest to psychiatrists, law enforcement professionals, lawyers, and citizens. It is a form of provoked homicide arising from a wish to die. Those who attempt SbC experience more mental illness, substance use, and recent trauma than the general population. This article examines those who attempt SbC and survive the encounters. SbC survivors who threaten or harm police or others may be charged with crimes such as weapons possession, aggravated assault, murder or attempted murder of an officer. The formulation of a provocative act, however, frustrates attempts at defenses based on mental state, resulting in few requests for expert testimony. Few data exist on how these individuals fare in court. Appellate cases in which defendants attempted to introduce evidence of SbC illustrate great variability in adjudication. Psychiatric defenses, such as diminished capacity and insanity, are usually inapplicable or unsuccessful because intent and knowledge of wrongfulness are implied in the provocative act. Diversion of SbC defendants into mental health courts is rare because of firearms use against police. The author argues that criminal justice ignores SbC survivors’ mental health and recommends application of therapeutic jurisprudence to give full expression of SbC dynamics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
警察幸存者自杀的刑事司法后果
警察自杀(SbC)的概念引起了精神科医生、执法人员、律师和公民的兴趣。这是一种因想死而引发的挑衅杀人。那些尝试SbC的人比一般人有更多的精神疾病、药物使用和最近的创伤。本文考察了那些尝试SbC并在遭遇中幸存下来的人。威胁或伤害警察或其他人的SbC幸存者可能会被指控持有武器、严重攻击、谋杀或企图谋杀警察等罪行。然而,挑衅性行为的表述阻碍了基于精神状态的辩护,导致很少有人要求专家作证。很少有数据显示这些人在法庭上的表现。在被告试图引入SbC证据的上诉案件中,裁决存在很大差异。精神病学的辩护,如行为能力下降和精神错乱,通常不适用或不成功,因为挑衅行为中暗示了意图和对不法行为的了解。由于对警察使用枪支,将SbC被告转移到精神健康法庭的情况很少。作者认为,刑事司法忽视了SbC幸存者的心理健康,建议运用治疗法学来充分表达SbC的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
29.60%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL, pronounced "apple") is an organization of psychiatrists dedicated to excellence in practice, teaching, and research in forensic psychiatry. Founded in 1969, AAPL currently has more than 1,500 members in North America and around the world.
期刊最新文献
Reconsidering the Relationship Between Criminal Insanity and Delusions. Hunger Strikes After Restricted Housing Reform. Practice Resource for Reproductive Psychiatry/Women's Mental Health in Forensic Psychiatry Practice. Characterizing Referrals to Professional Health Monitoring Programs for Unprofessional Sexual Behavior. Dosing and Misuse of Buprenorphine in the New Jersey Department of Corrections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1