{"title":"The Farmers' Schools of 1909: The Origins of Arkansas's Four Regional Universities","authors":"James F. Willis","doi":"10.2307/40031077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ARKANSAS'S UNIVERSITIES at Jonesboro, Magnolia, Monticello, and Russellville owe their existence to the Farmers' Educational and Cooperative Union. It struggled a century ago to have the legislature establish four agricultural schools in the state. These schools took many decades to flower into universities, an evolution that occurred in several stages and was by no means assured. But without the union's uncompromising demand from 1906 to 1909 for four schools, at least two of these institutions of higher education-Arkansas State University, Arkansas Tech University, Southern Arkansas University, and the University of Arkansas at Monticello-would likely not exist today. Agricultural education reform during the Progressive Era was part of a broader national impulse-the County Life Movement. It aimed generally to reverse the decline of rural America. Several approaches to spreading modern farming practices in a countryside still using traditional methods competed within the movement, including various models for agricultural education. In Arkansas, the views of the Farmers' Union triumphed with respect to the number, type, and management of agricultural schools. The union prevailed even against its allies-Arkansas educators, the General Education Board, and Gov. George W. Donaghey-who wanted fewer schools and different kinds of schools. When the Arkansas legislature in 1909 passed Act 100 to establish a \"State Agricultural School\" in each of four districts, the state joined the front ranks of progressive reform. Such schools at the secondary level had captured the imagination and won the support of many who worried about the widening economic and social gap between urban-industrial America and the agrarian countryside. It was made worse, they believed, by the drain of able, ambitious young people from farm to city. President Theodore Roosevelt declared in 1907: I am firmly convinced that most farmers' boys and girls should be educated through agricultural high schools and through the teaching of practical elementary agriculture in the rural common schools, so that when grown up they shall become farmers and farmers' wives. Education should be toward and not away from the farm. There must be an organized effort to restore or create the highest social condition in the country districts.1 Roosevelt favored legislation that Georgia congressmen introduced to provide federal funding for \"instruction and home economics in secondary agricultural schools.\"2 Roosevelt's assistant secretary of agriculture, WiIlet M. Hays, confidently predicted in 1908 that soon there would be some \"300 to 400 agricultural finishing schools-practically one in each country congressional district.\"3 The Commission on Country Life that Roosevelt established declared in 1909 that \"redirected education\" was of \"paramount importance\" and advocated three approaches: 1) the study of agriculture in \"regular public school work;\" 2) \"specialized agricultural schools;\" and 3) \"extension teaching conducted by agricultural colleges by means of the printed page, face-to-face talks and demonstrations.\"4 A movement for agricultural schools was already underway in many states. Largely through philanthropic efforts, some agricultural and industrial schools had been built in the nineteenth century. By 1900, three states-Alabama, Minnesota, and Nebraska-had established public agricultural schools; within a decade fourteen more states had done so. The earliest agricultural schools in the South aimed their \"practical\" education at blacks, while the preferred educational path for whites remained a traditional liberal arts curriculum.5 Alabama, in addition to funding the Tuskegee Institute for African Americans, had, beginning in 1889, established white-only \"agricultural\" schools in each of its congressional districts, but these schools' curricula remained largely literary and did not emphasize agricultural training until 1908 or home economics until 1912. …","PeriodicalId":51953,"journal":{"name":"ARKANSAS HISTORICAL QUARTERLY","volume":"65 1","pages":"224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40031077","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARKANSAS HISTORICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40031077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ARKANSAS'S UNIVERSITIES at Jonesboro, Magnolia, Monticello, and Russellville owe their existence to the Farmers' Educational and Cooperative Union. It struggled a century ago to have the legislature establish four agricultural schools in the state. These schools took many decades to flower into universities, an evolution that occurred in several stages and was by no means assured. But without the union's uncompromising demand from 1906 to 1909 for four schools, at least two of these institutions of higher education-Arkansas State University, Arkansas Tech University, Southern Arkansas University, and the University of Arkansas at Monticello-would likely not exist today. Agricultural education reform during the Progressive Era was part of a broader national impulse-the County Life Movement. It aimed generally to reverse the decline of rural America. Several approaches to spreading modern farming practices in a countryside still using traditional methods competed within the movement, including various models for agricultural education. In Arkansas, the views of the Farmers' Union triumphed with respect to the number, type, and management of agricultural schools. The union prevailed even against its allies-Arkansas educators, the General Education Board, and Gov. George W. Donaghey-who wanted fewer schools and different kinds of schools. When the Arkansas legislature in 1909 passed Act 100 to establish a "State Agricultural School" in each of four districts, the state joined the front ranks of progressive reform. Such schools at the secondary level had captured the imagination and won the support of many who worried about the widening economic and social gap between urban-industrial America and the agrarian countryside. It was made worse, they believed, by the drain of able, ambitious young people from farm to city. President Theodore Roosevelt declared in 1907: I am firmly convinced that most farmers' boys and girls should be educated through agricultural high schools and through the teaching of practical elementary agriculture in the rural common schools, so that when grown up they shall become farmers and farmers' wives. Education should be toward and not away from the farm. There must be an organized effort to restore or create the highest social condition in the country districts.1 Roosevelt favored legislation that Georgia congressmen introduced to provide federal funding for "instruction and home economics in secondary agricultural schools."2 Roosevelt's assistant secretary of agriculture, WiIlet M. Hays, confidently predicted in 1908 that soon there would be some "300 to 400 agricultural finishing schools-practically one in each country congressional district."3 The Commission on Country Life that Roosevelt established declared in 1909 that "redirected education" was of "paramount importance" and advocated three approaches: 1) the study of agriculture in "regular public school work;" 2) "specialized agricultural schools;" and 3) "extension teaching conducted by agricultural colleges by means of the printed page, face-to-face talks and demonstrations."4 A movement for agricultural schools was already underway in many states. Largely through philanthropic efforts, some agricultural and industrial schools had been built in the nineteenth century. By 1900, three states-Alabama, Minnesota, and Nebraska-had established public agricultural schools; within a decade fourteen more states had done so. The earliest agricultural schools in the South aimed their "practical" education at blacks, while the preferred educational path for whites remained a traditional liberal arts curriculum.5 Alabama, in addition to funding the Tuskegee Institute for African Americans, had, beginning in 1889, established white-only "agricultural" schools in each of its congressional districts, but these schools' curricula remained largely literary and did not emphasize agricultural training until 1908 or home economics until 1912. …
阿肯色州的琼斯博罗、Magnolia、Monticello和Russellville大学的存在要归功于农民教育与合作联盟。一个世纪前,为了让立法机构在该州建立四所农业学校,该州曾经历过一番挣扎。这些学校花了几十年的时间才发展成为大学,这一演变经历了几个阶段,而且绝不是确定的。但是,如果不是工会在1906年到1909年间毫不妥协地要求建立四所学校,这些高等教育机构中至少有两所——阿肯色州立大学、阿肯色理工大学、南阿肯色大学和阿肯色大学蒙蒂塞洛分校——今天可能就不存在了。进步时代的农业教育改革是一场更广泛的全国性运动——乡村生活运动的一部分。它的总体目标是扭转美国农村的衰落。在仍在使用传统方法的农村传播现代农业实践的几种方法在运动中相互竞争,包括各种农业教育模式。在阿肯色州,农民联盟的观点在农业学校的数量、类型和管理方面取得了胜利。工会甚至战胜了它的盟友——阿肯色州教育工作者、普通教育委员会和州长乔治·w·多纳希——他们希望减少学校数量,改变学校种类。当阿肯色州立法机关于1909年通过第100号法案,在四个区各建立一所“州立农业学校”时,该州加入了进步改革的前沿。这种中等水平的学校激发了人们的想象力,赢得了许多人的支持,他们担心美国城市工业和农业农村之间的经济和社会差距正在扩大。他们认为,有能力、有抱负的年轻人从农村流入城市,使情况变得更糟。西奥多·罗斯福总统在1907年宣布:我坚定地相信,大多数农民的男孩和女孩应该通过农业高中和农村普通学校的实用初级农业教学来接受教育,这样他们长大后就会成为农民和农民的妻子。教育应该朝着农场而不是远离农场。必须有组织地努力在乡村地区恢复或创造最高的社会条件罗斯福赞成乔治亚州国会议员提出的立法,为“中等农业学校的教学和家政学”提供联邦资金。罗斯福的农业助理部长海斯(wililet M. Hays)在1908年自信地预测,很快就会有“300至400所农业精加工学校——实际上每个国家的国会选区都有一所”。罗斯福成立的乡村生活委员会在1909年宣布,“重新定向教育”是“至关重要的”,并提倡三种方法:1)在“正规公立学校工作”中学习农业;2) “农业专业学校”;及农业院校采用纸页、面授、示范等方式进行推广教学。在许多州,建立农业学校的运动已经开始。在慈善事业的大力支持下,19世纪建立了一些农业和工业学校。到1900年,阿拉巴马州、明尼苏达州和内布拉斯加州这三个州已经建立了公立农业学校;十年之内,又有14个州这样做了。南方最早的农业学校以黑人为对象进行“实用”教育,而白人更喜欢的教育途径仍然是传统的文科课程阿拉巴马州除了资助塔斯基吉非裔美国人学院外,从1889年开始,在每个国会选区建立了白人专用的“农业”学校,但这些学校的课程主要是文学,直到1908年才强调农业培训,直到1912年才强调家政学。…