California

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Education Finance Pub Date : 2018-04-10 DOI:10.2307/j.ctv1chs6hx.11
Henry Tran
{"title":"California","authors":"Henry Tran","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1chs6hx.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"funding priorities for p-12 For this year’s state budget, the State of California approved Proposition 98 (a minimum funding guarantee amendment that determines general funding for education) resulting in a funding increase of $2.6 billion over the 2016 level to $74.5 billion. This increase included $50 million in Prop 98 Funds to increase provider reimbursement rates for After School and Education Safety Programs. It also provides $41.3 million in one time funds for teacher recruitment and development programs funded by Proposition 98 General Funds ($30 million) and Federal Title II funds ($11.3 million). Twenty-five million dollars in one-time Prop 8 General Funds have been earmarked to support the California Classified School Employees Credentialing program, which provides grants to K-12 agencies to support recruitment of noncertified employees to participate in California teacher preparation programs. Districts will also see an increase in $5 million in one-time Prop 8 General Funds for competitive grants to support professional development for teacher and paraprofessional providing bilingual and multilingual instruction. The state approved a total of $57.3 billion in Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) Funding and an additional $1.4 billion towards the implementation of the Local Control Funding Formula (in its fifth year) which will result in LCFF being 97% completely implemented. The state will provide an increase of an additional $7 million in LCFF resource augmentation funds for County Office of Educations to support Local Control and Accountability Plan review and technical assistance workload and an increase of $3.5 million Prop 98 General Funds to reflect Cost of Living Adjustments for a K-12 mandate block grant. A total of $76.9 million was appropriated to fund a 1.56% Cost of Living Adjustment for several categories programs (e.g., Special Education, Foster Youth) external to LCFF. Proposition 98 will also provide an increase of $2.5 million in one-time General Funds to support local education agencies in their promotion of equity","PeriodicalId":44075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education Finance","volume":"65 1","pages":"232 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1chs6hx.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

funding priorities for p-12 For this year’s state budget, the State of California approved Proposition 98 (a minimum funding guarantee amendment that determines general funding for education) resulting in a funding increase of $2.6 billion over the 2016 level to $74.5 billion. This increase included $50 million in Prop 98 Funds to increase provider reimbursement rates for After School and Education Safety Programs. It also provides $41.3 million in one time funds for teacher recruitment and development programs funded by Proposition 98 General Funds ($30 million) and Federal Title II funds ($11.3 million). Twenty-five million dollars in one-time Prop 8 General Funds have been earmarked to support the California Classified School Employees Credentialing program, which provides grants to K-12 agencies to support recruitment of noncertified employees to participate in California teacher preparation programs. Districts will also see an increase in $5 million in one-time Prop 8 General Funds for competitive grants to support professional development for teacher and paraprofessional providing bilingual and multilingual instruction. The state approved a total of $57.3 billion in Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) Funding and an additional $1.4 billion towards the implementation of the Local Control Funding Formula (in its fifth year) which will result in LCFF being 97% completely implemented. The state will provide an increase of an additional $7 million in LCFF resource augmentation funds for County Office of Educations to support Local Control and Accountability Plan review and technical assistance workload and an increase of $3.5 million Prop 98 General Funds to reflect Cost of Living Adjustments for a K-12 mandate block grant. A total of $76.9 million was appropriated to fund a 1.56% Cost of Living Adjustment for several categories programs (e.g., Special Education, Foster Youth) external to LCFF. Proposition 98 will also provide an increase of $2.5 million in one-time General Funds to support local education agencies in their promotion of equity
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加州
在今年的州预算中,加利福尼亚州通过了第98号提案(一项确定教育一般资金的最低资金保证修正案),导致资金在2016年的基础上增加26亿美元,达到745亿美元。这一增长包括5000万美元的98号提案基金,用于提高课后和教育安全项目的供应商报销率。它还提供了4130万美元的一次性资金,用于教师招聘和发展项目,这些项目由98号提案普通基金(3000万美元)和联邦标题II基金(1130万美元)资助。一次性拨款2500万美元用于支持加州分类学校员工资格认证计划,该计划向K-12机构提供赠款,以支持招募未认证的员工参加加州教师培训计划。各地区也将增加500万美元的一次性第8号提案一般基金,作为竞争性奖助金,以支持提供双语和多语言教学的教师和辅助专业人员的专业发展。州政府总共批准了573亿美元的地方控制资金公式(LCFF)资金,另外还有14亿美元用于实施地方控制资金公式(第五年),这将使LCFF得到97%的完全实施。该州将为县教育办公室额外增加700万美元的LCFF资源增加基金,以支持当地控制和问责计划的审查和技术援助工作量,并增加350万美元的98号提案普通基金,以反映K-12任务的生活成本调整补助金。拨款总额为7690万美元,用于资助LCFF外部的几个类别项目(例如,特殊教育,寄养青年)的1.56%的生活成本调整。98号提案还将增加250万美元的一次性普通基金,以支持地方教育机构促进公平
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education Finance
Journal of Education Finance EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For over three decades the Journal of Education Finance has been recognized as one of the leading journals in the field of the financing of public schools. Each issue brings original research and analysis on issues such as educational fiscal reform, judicial intervention in finance, adequacy and equity of public school funding, school/social agency linkages, taxation, factors affecting employment and salaries, and the economics of human capital development.
期刊最新文献
Per Pupil and School Safety Spending: An Empirical Perspective Tennessee Minnesota Mississippi West Virginia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1