Properties of Experiemntal Panels Made from Mixture of Dolomite and Olivine with Calabrian pine Wood Particles. Part 1. Physical properties

H. Şahin, Ö. Yalçin, A. Kaya, U. Özkan
{"title":"Properties of Experiemntal Panels Made from Mixture of Dolomite and Olivine with Calabrian pine Wood Particles. Part 1. Physical properties","authors":"H. Şahin, Ö. Yalçin, A. Kaya, U. Özkan","doi":"10.24011/barofd.1240472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of two mineral adducts (dolomite and olivine) as proportion in Calabrian pine wood chip based-experimental panels which bonded with synthetic adhesive (UF) were evaluated. It appears both minerals (P: calabrian pine wood chip-, X: Dolomite- Y: Olivine in composite proportions) improve the water repellent efficiency (WRE) properties at certain extent. In all experimental procedure, WRE increased with dolomite and olivine proportions higher than >10% in board formulations. The highest WRE of -34.2% and -35.4% were found with PX5 and PY5 samples that made with 1:1 (w/w) dolomite/wood and olivine/wood formulations, respectively. Like water sorption, similar trend was also found for thickness swelling (TS) properties. The lower TS values were found to be in range of -11.2 to -56.4% for dolomite-, and -55.5 to -69.5% for olivine based panels, respectively. Only samples of PX1, which produced 1:9 dolomite/wood chips (w,w, %) proportions, show higher IB value than control (PX0: 0.87 MPa vs PX1: 0.99 MPa) while rest of dolomite- pine wood panels show lower IB values. In contrast to dolomite, olivine appear to be improving effects on IB properties at certain conditions. The highest IB value of 1.21 MPa was found with sample PY4, which produced 4:6 olivine/wood chips (w,w, %) proportions, indicate approximately 39.1% higher IB value than control. It is notable that olivine seems to more effective than dolomite at similar board properation formulations in terms of lowering TS, WA and creating higher internal bond strength properties than dolomite based panels at similar experimental conditions. However, only sample of PY1, made with 1:9 (w, w,%) olivine/wood and proportions, show higher bending strength (13.27 MPa) and elasticity (2468.2 MPa than control (PY0:12.75 MPa vs 2245.2 MPa).","PeriodicalId":55736,"journal":{"name":"Bartin Orman Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bartin Orman Fakultesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24011/barofd.1240472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects of two mineral adducts (dolomite and olivine) as proportion in Calabrian pine wood chip based-experimental panels which bonded with synthetic adhesive (UF) were evaluated. It appears both minerals (P: calabrian pine wood chip-, X: Dolomite- Y: Olivine in composite proportions) improve the water repellent efficiency (WRE) properties at certain extent. In all experimental procedure, WRE increased with dolomite and olivine proportions higher than >10% in board formulations. The highest WRE of -34.2% and -35.4% were found with PX5 and PY5 samples that made with 1:1 (w/w) dolomite/wood and olivine/wood formulations, respectively. Like water sorption, similar trend was also found for thickness swelling (TS) properties. The lower TS values were found to be in range of -11.2 to -56.4% for dolomite-, and -55.5 to -69.5% for olivine based panels, respectively. Only samples of PX1, which produced 1:9 dolomite/wood chips (w,w, %) proportions, show higher IB value than control (PX0: 0.87 MPa vs PX1: 0.99 MPa) while rest of dolomite- pine wood panels show lower IB values. In contrast to dolomite, olivine appear to be improving effects on IB properties at certain conditions. The highest IB value of 1.21 MPa was found with sample PY4, which produced 4:6 olivine/wood chips (w,w, %) proportions, indicate approximately 39.1% higher IB value than control. It is notable that olivine seems to more effective than dolomite at similar board properation formulations in terms of lowering TS, WA and creating higher internal bond strength properties than dolomite based panels at similar experimental conditions. However, only sample of PY1, made with 1:9 (w, w,%) olivine/wood and proportions, show higher bending strength (13.27 MPa) and elasticity (2468.2 MPa than control (PY0:12.75 MPa vs 2245.2 MPa).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白云石、橄榄石与卡拉布里亚松木颗粒混合材料实验板的性能研究。第1部分。物理性质
评价了两种矿物加合物(白云石和橄榄石)按比例加入合成胶粘剂(UF)粘结卡拉布里亚松木片基实验板的效果。两种矿物(P:卡拉布里亚松木屑-,X:白云石- Y:橄榄石复合比例)在一定程度上提高了防水效率。在所有实验过程中,随着白云石和橄榄石在板材配方中的比例高于10%,WRE增加。以1:1 (w/w)白云石/木材和1:1 (w/w)橄榄石/木材配制的PX5和PY5样品的WRE最高,分别为-34.2%和-35.4%。与吸水性类似,厚度膨胀(TS)性能也有类似的趋势。较低的TS值分别为白云岩-11.2 ~ -56.4%和橄榄石基板-55.5 ~ -69.5%。只有白云石/木屑(w,w, %)比例为1:9的PX1样品的IB值高于对照(PX0: 0.87 MPa vs PX1: 0.99 MPa),而其他白云石-松木面板的IB值较低。与白云石相比,橄榄石在某些条件下似乎对IB性能有改善作用。样品PY4产生的橄榄石/木屑(w,w, %)比例为4:6,IB值最高,为1.21 MPa,比对照高约39.1%。值得注意的是,在类似的板性能配方下,橄榄石似乎比白云石更有效,因为在类似的实验条件下,橄榄石比白云石基板在降低TS、WA和创造更高的内部粘合强度性能方面更有效。然而,只有以1:9 (w, w,%)橄榄石/木材和比例制成的PY1样品显示出更高的弯曲强度(13.27 MPa)和弹性(2468.2 MPa)比对照(PY0:12.75 MPa vs 2245.2 MPa)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gıda Endüstrisinde Kâğıt Ambalajların Fiziksel ve Mekanik Özellikleri Dikimle Yetiştirilmiş Kayın Meşçerelerinde, Aralamanın Mikrobiyal Biyokütle Karbon ve Toprak Solunumuna Etkileri Variation in Soil Properties and Nutrient Stocks Under Different Forest Tree Species with Altitude, Aspect and Soil Depths Determination of Suitable Areas for Chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) Afforestation with Analytic Hierarchy Process Kuarternize Karboksimetil Selüloz Esaslı Farklı Ahşap Kaplamaların Antimikrobiyal ve Yüzey Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1