Vessels from Late Medieval cemeteries in the Central Balkans

Q2 Arts and Humanities Starinar Pub Date : 2011-01-01 DOI:10.2298/STA1161285B
Vesna Bikić
{"title":"Vessels from Late Medieval cemeteries in the Central Balkans","authors":"Vesna Bikić","doi":"10.2298/STA1161285B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although a rare occurrence in late medieval cemeteries, vessels have been found on almost all major sites of the period, such as Novo Brdo, Trgoviste, Reljina Gradina and the churchyard of St Peter’s near Novi Pazar, the churchyard of St Nicholas’ at Kursumlija, the churchyard of St Stephen’s at Milentija near Brus, Mali Zvecan, Mirijevo, Vinca. Vessels occur in different places, both on top of and in graves. Fragments of pottery and glass vessels are relatively abundant in layers of earth filling burial pits and chambers, and in those immediately overlaying burial pits or gravestones. The available data make it possible to recognize almost all functional types. The most frequently found pottery shapes are larger liquid containers - jugs and pitchers, and apparently there have also been many pots, both hearth cooking and glazed (figs. 1-3; 5-9). Recognizable among the glass vessels are bottles, usually those with long fluted necks and biconical, as well as infrequent icon lamps. The data about the vessels found buried with the deceased is much more detailed. Such finds are recorded at Macvanska Mitrovica (fig. 10/3), Brestovik (fig. 13/3), Mirijevo (fig. 4/1), Vinca (figs. 4/2; 10/4), Stragari near Kragujevac, Milentija near Brus, round the church of St Peter near Novi Pazar, at the monastery of Konculic (fig. 13/2) and the monastery of Gradac. The relatively plentiful and diverse vessels discovered at the cemeteries of medieval Trgoviste are especially illustrative (fig. 10/2, 7). The available descriptions of vessels and archaeological contexts provide a general impression about the types of vessels recorded in the cemeteries of a late medieval and early modern date in the central Balkans. Glass bottles as a rule were laid in graves, while earth-fill layers, apart from bottles, contained plentiful shards of drinking vessels. As for the bottles, two types were registered: biconical and those with long fluted necks (figs. 10; 12/1). Among the glass fragments there were parts of bottles with a ring around the neck and a ribbed body (Rippenflaschen), generally known in domestic scholarship under the term Panik type bottle (fig. 10/8). Also identifiable among the recovered glass fragments are drinking vessels of several types, beakers with small or large prunts (Nuppenbecher and Krautstrunk) and ribbed (Rippenbecher), common especially in the 15th and 16th centuries (figs. 12/1, 3, 5, 6). There are also pieces with a blue thread applied around the rim and body, similar to the examples from Stalac reproduced herein (fig. 12/3). Quite rarely found are drinking vessels of cobalt blue glass, which are mostly small, except for a few examples of up to 14 cm in height, which is also the height of the abovementioned bottles. Apart from Venice and Dubrovnik (Ragusa), glassware was imported from Hungary. The discovered pottery vessels show a greater diversity, mostly in terms of shape. In addition to liquid containers - jugs, pitchers and beakers, there occur bowls, pots and even apothecary vessels. A vast majority belong to the Serbian ware of the 14th and 15th centuries. Most are glazed, and frequently painted with spirals, bands and blotches in white, green and dark brown or decorated with simple sgrafitto patterns, such as the finds from Novo Brdo (fig. 1), St Peter’s (figs 9; 13/1, 4) and the monastery of Gradac. By far the most interesting of them is the beaker from Konculic with an openwork edge around the base (fig. 12/2), which is commonly found in glass beakers of the same period. Deserving of particular attention are three cylindrical ceramic bottles from Novo Brdo (fig. 2). The presented material allows us to recognize the central issues surrounding the occurrence of vessels in the cemeteries of the 14th to 17th century in Serbia. Given the small number of recorded cases, the presence of vessels in graves as grave goods appears to have been utterly sporadic. Being based on the processed and published results, and given the small number of systematically investigated and analyzed cemeteries, however, such a conclusion should be taken with caution. In most cases, the vessels were laid beside the head of the deceased, usually on its left, rarely on the right side, and only exceptionally next to the legs or the upper body area. On the other hand, the amount of fragments discovered in cemeteries is generally large, as shown, for example, by a cursory insight into the excavation records for the site of Novo Brdo. This discrepancy is surprising and makes us think over the character of the finds, but we shall not get closer to an answer until we have detailed context analyses done and the material systematized and statistically processed. When it comes to shapes, liquid containers obviously predominated - glass bottles and ceramic pitchers, followed by glass and ceramic drinking vessels, while ceramic pots and bowls occurred in graves only rarely. The vessels are mostly small. The glass bottles are between 14 and 15 cm in height on average, except the specimen from Mali Zvecan, which is more than twice as high (36 cm). The cups show similar heights, between 10 and 16 cm. The ceramic pitchers and pots are also small, with a height usually not exceeding 16 cm. Judging by the available data, it appears that shards of larger vessels were found on top of graves (bowls, pitchers, jugs, pots), apparently brought for the memorial ceremony held at the grave, while graves usually contained small vessels, usually bottles. Apart from Serbia, the occurrence of vessels in cemeteries has also been recorded in the surrounding areas. Given their very distinctive context and character, the finds from Bosnia draw particular attention, as well as those from Croatia, where they are concentrated in the broader area of Split. This overview makes it plain that the vessels laid in graves differ little from ordinary household utensils. Moreover, all can be classified as typical of the 14th to 17th century - Venetian, Dubrovnik and Hungarian glass, and the ceramic kitchen and tableware produced locally, in Serbia. For the sake of comparison, we draw attention to similar vessels discovered on fortress, settlement and monastery sites, such as Stalac, Belgrade (fig. 14), Studenica, Mileseva, Trgoviste, Trnava near Cacak. The presented examples, combined with all previously gained insights, clearly demonstrate and corroborate the assumption that the custom of laying vessels in graves in the central Balkans was an uncommon but long-standing phenomenon. Unlike earlier periods, when it was pottery vessels that were almost exclusively placed in graves, from the 14th century on the ratio of glass to ceramic vessels, mostly bottles, pitchers and beakers, becomes virtually equal. Judging by the find-spots and other known information, in the late medieval period the custom of laying vessels in graves was confined to a few areas along the Danube, Morava, Ibar, Drina and Neretva rivers. These areas, in the hinterland of Dubrovnik, in Herzegovina, Bosnia and Serbia, are associated with major caravan routes, which is relevant in our considerations of the glass finds. As it appears from the examples from all aforementioned areas, the only difference of some significance concerns the type of glass vessels used in funeral rituals - bottles in Serbia and Croatia, and drinking vessels in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Even though this seems to give grounds to assume certain regional variation in the custom of making offerings to the dead, at this point any conclusion would be highly conjectural, especially if based only on the available archaeological data. As shown by ethnological research, the custom, also sporadic, survived in Serbia and Bulgaria until the late 19th century. The analysis of the vessels from late medieval and early modern cemeteries has revealed a number of features common to the central-Balkan region, but also some regional variation. However, given the proportion of processed specimens in the entire recovered material, the assumptions and results presented here should only be taken as preliminary. The fact that some manifestations of the custom are still obscure reduces some of the previously proposed interpretations to little more than unfounded speculation, which is fertile ground for manipulation. Apart from analyzing the archaeological material, what is needed therefore is a thorough study of other aspects of the issue, above all the phenomenon of burials topped by slabs and stecci, and funerary practices at large. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 177021: Procesi urbanizacije i razvoja srednjovekovnog drustva]","PeriodicalId":36206,"journal":{"name":"Starinar","volume":"1 1","pages":"285-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Starinar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/STA1161285B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Although a rare occurrence in late medieval cemeteries, vessels have been found on almost all major sites of the period, such as Novo Brdo, Trgoviste, Reljina Gradina and the churchyard of St Peter’s near Novi Pazar, the churchyard of St Nicholas’ at Kursumlija, the churchyard of St Stephen’s at Milentija near Brus, Mali Zvecan, Mirijevo, Vinca. Vessels occur in different places, both on top of and in graves. Fragments of pottery and glass vessels are relatively abundant in layers of earth filling burial pits and chambers, and in those immediately overlaying burial pits or gravestones. The available data make it possible to recognize almost all functional types. The most frequently found pottery shapes are larger liquid containers - jugs and pitchers, and apparently there have also been many pots, both hearth cooking and glazed (figs. 1-3; 5-9). Recognizable among the glass vessels are bottles, usually those with long fluted necks and biconical, as well as infrequent icon lamps. The data about the vessels found buried with the deceased is much more detailed. Such finds are recorded at Macvanska Mitrovica (fig. 10/3), Brestovik (fig. 13/3), Mirijevo (fig. 4/1), Vinca (figs. 4/2; 10/4), Stragari near Kragujevac, Milentija near Brus, round the church of St Peter near Novi Pazar, at the monastery of Konculic (fig. 13/2) and the monastery of Gradac. The relatively plentiful and diverse vessels discovered at the cemeteries of medieval Trgoviste are especially illustrative (fig. 10/2, 7). The available descriptions of vessels and archaeological contexts provide a general impression about the types of vessels recorded in the cemeteries of a late medieval and early modern date in the central Balkans. Glass bottles as a rule were laid in graves, while earth-fill layers, apart from bottles, contained plentiful shards of drinking vessels. As for the bottles, two types were registered: biconical and those with long fluted necks (figs. 10; 12/1). Among the glass fragments there were parts of bottles with a ring around the neck and a ribbed body (Rippenflaschen), generally known in domestic scholarship under the term Panik type bottle (fig. 10/8). Also identifiable among the recovered glass fragments are drinking vessels of several types, beakers with small or large prunts (Nuppenbecher and Krautstrunk) and ribbed (Rippenbecher), common especially in the 15th and 16th centuries (figs. 12/1, 3, 5, 6). There are also pieces with a blue thread applied around the rim and body, similar to the examples from Stalac reproduced herein (fig. 12/3). Quite rarely found are drinking vessels of cobalt blue glass, which are mostly small, except for a few examples of up to 14 cm in height, which is also the height of the abovementioned bottles. Apart from Venice and Dubrovnik (Ragusa), glassware was imported from Hungary. The discovered pottery vessels show a greater diversity, mostly in terms of shape. In addition to liquid containers - jugs, pitchers and beakers, there occur bowls, pots and even apothecary vessels. A vast majority belong to the Serbian ware of the 14th and 15th centuries. Most are glazed, and frequently painted with spirals, bands and blotches in white, green and dark brown or decorated with simple sgrafitto patterns, such as the finds from Novo Brdo (fig. 1), St Peter’s (figs 9; 13/1, 4) and the monastery of Gradac. By far the most interesting of them is the beaker from Konculic with an openwork edge around the base (fig. 12/2), which is commonly found in glass beakers of the same period. Deserving of particular attention are three cylindrical ceramic bottles from Novo Brdo (fig. 2). The presented material allows us to recognize the central issues surrounding the occurrence of vessels in the cemeteries of the 14th to 17th century in Serbia. Given the small number of recorded cases, the presence of vessels in graves as grave goods appears to have been utterly sporadic. Being based on the processed and published results, and given the small number of systematically investigated and analyzed cemeteries, however, such a conclusion should be taken with caution. In most cases, the vessels were laid beside the head of the deceased, usually on its left, rarely on the right side, and only exceptionally next to the legs or the upper body area. On the other hand, the amount of fragments discovered in cemeteries is generally large, as shown, for example, by a cursory insight into the excavation records for the site of Novo Brdo. This discrepancy is surprising and makes us think over the character of the finds, but we shall not get closer to an answer until we have detailed context analyses done and the material systematized and statistically processed. When it comes to shapes, liquid containers obviously predominated - glass bottles and ceramic pitchers, followed by glass and ceramic drinking vessels, while ceramic pots and bowls occurred in graves only rarely. The vessels are mostly small. The glass bottles are between 14 and 15 cm in height on average, except the specimen from Mali Zvecan, which is more than twice as high (36 cm). The cups show similar heights, between 10 and 16 cm. The ceramic pitchers and pots are also small, with a height usually not exceeding 16 cm. Judging by the available data, it appears that shards of larger vessels were found on top of graves (bowls, pitchers, jugs, pots), apparently brought for the memorial ceremony held at the grave, while graves usually contained small vessels, usually bottles. Apart from Serbia, the occurrence of vessels in cemeteries has also been recorded in the surrounding areas. Given their very distinctive context and character, the finds from Bosnia draw particular attention, as well as those from Croatia, where they are concentrated in the broader area of Split. This overview makes it plain that the vessels laid in graves differ little from ordinary household utensils. Moreover, all can be classified as typical of the 14th to 17th century - Venetian, Dubrovnik and Hungarian glass, and the ceramic kitchen and tableware produced locally, in Serbia. For the sake of comparison, we draw attention to similar vessels discovered on fortress, settlement and monastery sites, such as Stalac, Belgrade (fig. 14), Studenica, Mileseva, Trgoviste, Trnava near Cacak. The presented examples, combined with all previously gained insights, clearly demonstrate and corroborate the assumption that the custom of laying vessels in graves in the central Balkans was an uncommon but long-standing phenomenon. Unlike earlier periods, when it was pottery vessels that were almost exclusively placed in graves, from the 14th century on the ratio of glass to ceramic vessels, mostly bottles, pitchers and beakers, becomes virtually equal. Judging by the find-spots and other known information, in the late medieval period the custom of laying vessels in graves was confined to a few areas along the Danube, Morava, Ibar, Drina and Neretva rivers. These areas, in the hinterland of Dubrovnik, in Herzegovina, Bosnia and Serbia, are associated with major caravan routes, which is relevant in our considerations of the glass finds. As it appears from the examples from all aforementioned areas, the only difference of some significance concerns the type of glass vessels used in funeral rituals - bottles in Serbia and Croatia, and drinking vessels in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Even though this seems to give grounds to assume certain regional variation in the custom of making offerings to the dead, at this point any conclusion would be highly conjectural, especially if based only on the available archaeological data. As shown by ethnological research, the custom, also sporadic, survived in Serbia and Bulgaria until the late 19th century. The analysis of the vessels from late medieval and early modern cemeteries has revealed a number of features common to the central-Balkan region, but also some regional variation. However, given the proportion of processed specimens in the entire recovered material, the assumptions and results presented here should only be taken as preliminary. The fact that some manifestations of the custom are still obscure reduces some of the previously proposed interpretations to little more than unfounded speculation, which is fertile ground for manipulation. Apart from analyzing the archaeological material, what is needed therefore is a thorough study of other aspects of the issue, above all the phenomenon of burials topped by slabs and stecci, and funerary practices at large. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 177021: Procesi urbanizacije i razvoja srednjovekovnog drustva]
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中巴尔干地区中世纪晚期墓地出土的船只
虽然在中世纪晚期的墓地中很少发生,但在该时期的几乎所有主要地点都发现了船只,例如Novo Brdo, Trgoviste, Reljina Gradina和Novi Pazar附近的圣彼得教堂墓地,Kursumlija的圣尼古拉斯教堂墓地,Brus附近的Milentija的圣斯蒂芬教堂墓地,Mali Zvecan, Mirijevo, Vinca。血管出现在不同的地方,无论是在顶部还是在坟墓里。在掩埋坑和墓室的土层中,以及直接覆盖在掩埋坑或墓碑上的土层中,陶器和玻璃器皿的碎片相对丰富。现有的数据可以识别几乎所有的功能类型。最常见的陶器形状是较大的液体容器——壶和罐,显然也有许多锅,既有炉膛烹饪的,也有釉面的。1 - 3;5 - 9)。在玻璃器皿中,可以辨认出一些瓶子,通常是那些有长凹槽和双圆锥形的瓶子,以及罕见的图标灯。与死者一同埋葬的器皿的数据要详细得多。这些发现记录在Macvanska Mitrovica(图10/3),Brestovik(图13/3),Mirijevo(图4/1),Vinca(图10/3)。4/2;10/4), Kragujevac附近的Stragari, Brus附近的Milentija, Novi Pazar附近的圣彼得教堂周围,Konculic修道院(图13/2)和Gradac修道院。在中世纪Trgoviste墓地中发现的相对丰富和多样的船只尤其具有说明意义(图10/ 2,7)。现有的船只描述和考古背景提供了关于巴尔干中部中世纪晚期和现代早期墓地中记录的船只类型的总体印象。玻璃瓶子通常被埋在坟墓里,而填土层除了瓶子外,还包含了大量的饮水器碎片。至于瓶子,登记了两种类型:双圆锥形和长凹槽颈的(图2)。10;12/1)。在这些玻璃碎片中,有一些瓶子的部分颈上有一个环,瓶身呈肋状(Rippenflaschen),在国内学术界通常称为Panik型瓶(图10/8)。在这些被发现的玻璃碎片中,还可以辨认出几种不同类型的饮用器皿,有小杯或大杯(Nuppenbecher和Krautstrunk)和肋杯(Rippenbecher),尤其是在15世纪和16世纪(图2)。12/1、3、5、6)。也有一些作品的边缘和主体周围应用了蓝色线,类似于本文复制的Stalac的例子(图12/3)。很少发现钴蓝色玻璃的饮用容器,这些容器大多很小,除了少数高度高达14厘米的例子,这也是上述瓶子的高度。除了威尼斯和杜布罗夫尼克(拉古萨),玻璃器皿是从匈牙利进口的。发现的陶器器皿表现出更大的多样性,主要是在形状方面。除了液体容器——壶、罐和烧杯,还有碗、壶甚至药瓶。其中绝大多数属于14世纪和15世纪的塞尔维亚人。大多数都是上釉的,经常被涂上白色、绿色和深棕色的螺旋、条纹和斑点,或者用简单的涂鸦图案装饰,比如在Novo Brdo(图1)、St Peter’s(图9)和saint’s(图9)的发现。13/ 1,4)和格拉达克修道院。到目前为止,其中最有趣的是来自Konculic的烧杯,底部周围有一个开口的边缘(图12/2),这在同一时期的玻璃烧杯中很常见。值得特别关注的是来自Novo Brdo的三个圆柱形陶瓷瓶(图2)。所呈现的材料使我们能够认识到围绕塞尔维亚14至17世纪墓地中容器出现的核心问题。鉴于记录在案的案件数量很少,在坟墓中出现作为陪葬品的船只似乎完全是零星的。然而,基于处理和发表的结果,并且考虑到系统调查和分析的墓地数量很少,这样的结论应该谨慎对待。在大多数情况下,血管被放置在死者头部的旁边,通常在左侧,很少在右侧,只有在腿或上半身附近才有例外。另一方面,在墓地中发现的碎片数量通常很大,例如,粗略地了解一下Novo Brdo遗址的挖掘记录就可以看出这一点。这种差异令人惊讶,并促使我们思考这些发现的性质,但在我们完成详细的背景分析和材料的系统化和统计处理之前,我们将无法接近答案。就形状而言,液体容器显然占主导地位——玻璃瓶和陶瓷罐,其次是玻璃和陶瓷饮用容器,而陶瓷锅和碗很少出现在坟墓中。 虽然在中世纪晚期的墓地中很少发生,但在该时期的几乎所有主要地点都发现了船只,例如Novo Brdo, Trgoviste, Reljina Gradina和Novi Pazar附近的圣彼得教堂墓地,Kursumlija的圣尼古拉斯教堂墓地,Brus附近的Milentija的圣斯蒂芬教堂墓地,Mali Zvecan, Mirijevo, Vinca。血管出现在不同的地方,无论是在顶部还是在坟墓里。在掩埋坑和墓室的土层中,以及直接覆盖在掩埋坑或墓碑上的土层中,陶器和玻璃器皿的碎片相对丰富。现有的数据可以识别几乎所有的功能类型。最常见的陶器形状是较大的液体容器——壶和罐,显然也有许多锅,既有炉膛烹饪的,也有釉面的。1 - 3;5 - 9)。在玻璃器皿中,可以辨认出一些瓶子,通常是那些有长凹槽和双圆锥形的瓶子,以及罕见的图标灯。与死者一同埋葬的器皿的数据要详细得多。这些发现记录在Macvanska Mitrovica(图10/3),Brestovik(图13/3),Mirijevo(图4/1),Vinca(图10/3)。4/2;10/4), Kragujevac附近的Stragari, Brus附近的Milentija, Novi Pazar附近的圣彼得教堂周围,Konculic修道院(图13/2)和Gradac修道院。在中世纪Trgoviste墓地中发现的相对丰富和多样的船只尤其具有说明意义(图10/ 2,7)。现有的船只描述和考古背景提供了关于巴尔干中部中世纪晚期和现代早期墓地中记录的船只类型的总体印象。玻璃瓶子通常被埋在坟墓里,而填土层除了瓶子外,还包含了大量的饮水器碎片。至于瓶子,登记了两种类型:双圆锥形和长凹槽颈的(图2)。10;12/1)。在这些玻璃碎片中,有一些瓶子的部分颈上有一个环,瓶身呈肋状(Rippenflaschen),在国内学术界通常称为Panik型瓶(图10/8)。在这些被发现的玻璃碎片中,还可以辨认出几种不同类型的饮用器皿,有小杯或大杯(Nuppenbecher和Krautstrunk)和肋杯(Rippenbecher),尤其是在15世纪和16世纪(图2)。12/1、3、5、6)。也有一些作品的边缘和主体周围应用了蓝色线,类似于本文复制的Stalac的例子(图12/3)。很少发现钴蓝色玻璃的饮用容器,这些容器大多很小,除了少数高度高达14厘米的例子,这也是上述瓶子的高度。除了威尼斯和杜布罗夫尼克(拉古萨),玻璃器皿是从匈牙利进口的。发现的陶器器皿表现出更大的多样性,主要是在形状方面。除了液体容器——壶、罐和烧杯,还有碗、壶甚至药瓶。其中绝大多数属于14世纪和15世纪的塞尔维亚人。大多数都是上釉的,经常被涂上白色、绿色和深棕色的螺旋、条纹和斑点,或者用简单的涂鸦图案装饰,比如在Novo Brdo(图1)、St Peter’s(图9)和saint’s(图9)的发现。13/ 1,4)和格拉达克修道院。到目前为止,其中最有趣的是来自Konculic的烧杯,底部周围有一个开口的边缘(图12/2),这在同一时期的玻璃烧杯中很常见。值得特别关注的是来自Novo Brdo的三个圆柱形陶瓷瓶(图2)。所呈现的材料使我们能够认识到围绕塞尔维亚14至17世纪墓地中容器出现的核心问题。鉴于记录在案的案件数量很少,在坟墓中出现作为陪葬品的船只似乎完全是零星的。然而,基于处理和发表的结果,并且考虑到系统调查和分析的墓地数量很少,这样的结论应该谨慎对待。在大多数情况下,血管被放置在死者头部的旁边,通常在左侧,很少在右侧,只有在腿或上半身附近才有例外。另一方面,在墓地中发现的碎片数量通常很大,例如,粗略地了解一下Novo Brdo遗址的挖掘记录就可以看出这一点。这种差异令人惊讶,并促使我们思考这些发现的性质,但在我们完成详细的背景分析和材料的系统化和统计处理之前,我们将无法接近答案。就形状而言,液体容器显然占主导地位——玻璃瓶和陶瓷罐,其次是玻璃和陶瓷饮用容器,而陶瓷锅和碗很少出现在坟墓中。 这些血管大多很小。这些玻璃瓶的平均高度在14到15厘米之间,除了来自马里兹维肯的标本,它的高度是它们的两倍多(36厘米)。杯子的高度相似,在10到16厘米之间。陶瓷的壶和罐也很小,高度通常不超过16厘米。根据现有资料判断,似乎在坟墓顶部发现了较大容器的碎片(碗,壶,壶,壶),显然是为在坟墓举行的纪念仪式而带来的,而坟墓通常装有小容器,通常是瓶子。除塞尔维亚外,在周围地区也有在墓地中发现船只的记录。由于波斯尼亚的这些发现具有非常独特的背景和性质,因此特别引人注意,克罗地亚的这些发现也特别引人注意,因为它们集中在斯普利特的广大地区。这一概述清楚地表明,坟墓中的器皿与普通的家用器皿差别不大。此外,所有这些都可以归类为14至17世纪的典型-威尼斯,杜布罗夫尼克和匈牙利的玻璃,以及塞尔维亚当地生产的陶瓷厨房和餐具。为了进行比较,我们提请注意在要塞、定居点和修道院遗址发现的类似船只,如贝尔格莱德的Stalac(图14)、Studenica、Mileseva、Trgoviste、察卡克附近的特尔纳瓦。所举的例子,加上以前获得的所有见解,清楚地表明并证实了这样一种假设,即在巴尔干中部的坟墓中放置船只的习俗是一种不常见但长期存在的现象。从14世纪开始,玻璃器皿和陶瓷器皿(主要是瓶子、水罐和烧杯)的比例几乎相等,这与早期几乎完全被放置在坟墓中的陶器不同。根据发现地点和其他已知信息判断,在中世纪晚期,在坟墓中放置船只的习俗仅限于多瑙河、莫拉瓦河、伊巴尔河、德里纳河和涅雷特瓦河沿岸的少数地区。这些地区位于杜布罗夫尼克腹地、黑塞哥维那、波斯尼亚和塞尔维亚境内,与主要的商队路线有关,这与我们对玻璃发现的考虑有关。从上述所有地区的例子看来,唯一有意义的区别在于葬礼仪式中使用的玻璃器皿的类型- -塞尔维亚和克罗地亚使用的是瓶子,波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那使用的是饮水器皿。尽管这似乎有理由假设,在向死者献祭的习俗中存在一定的地区差异,但在这一点上,任何结论都是高度推测的,特别是如果只基于现有的考古数据。人种学研究表明,这种风俗也是零星的,在塞尔维亚和保加利亚一直延续到19世纪末。对中世纪晚期和现代早期墓葬中出土的器皿的分析揭示了许多巴尔干中部地区的共同特征,但也有一些地区差异。然而,考虑到处理过的试样在整个回收材料中的比例,这里提出的假设和结果只能作为初步的。这一习俗的一些表现形式仍然模糊不清,这一事实使以前提出的一些解释不过是毫无根据的猜测,这是操纵的肥沃土壤。因此,除了分析考古材料之外,还需要对这个问题的其他方面进行彻底的研究,首先是用石板和石碑盖棺的现象,以及整个丧葬实践。[南斯拉夫]塞族共和国部长项目;[177021]城市化进程[j]。 这些血管大多很小。这些玻璃瓶的平均高度在14到15厘米之间,除了来自马里兹维肯的标本,它的高度是它们的两倍多(36厘米)。杯子的高度相似,在10到16厘米之间。陶瓷的壶和罐也很小,高度通常不超过16厘米。根据现有资料判断,似乎在坟墓顶部发现了较大容器的碎片(碗,壶,壶,壶),显然是为在坟墓举行的纪念仪式而带来的,而坟墓通常装有小容器,通常是瓶子。除塞尔维亚外,在周围地区也有在墓地中发现船只的记录。由于波斯尼亚的这些发现具有非常独特的背景和性质,因此特别引人注意,克罗地亚的这些发现也特别引人注意,因为它们集中在斯普利特的广大地区。这一概述清楚地表明,坟墓中的器皿与普通的家用器皿差别不大。此外,所有这些都可以归类为14至17世纪的典型-威尼斯,杜布罗夫尼克和匈牙利的玻璃,以及塞尔维亚当地生产的陶瓷厨房和餐具。为了进行比较,我们提请注意在要塞、定居点和修道院遗址发现的类似船只,如贝尔格莱德的Stalac(图14)、Studenica、Mileseva、Trgoviste、察卡克附近的特尔纳瓦。所举的例子,加上以前获得的所有见解,清楚地表明并证实了这样一种假设,即在巴尔干中部的坟墓中放置船只的习俗是一种不常见但长期存在的现象。从14世纪开始,玻璃器皿和陶瓷器皿(主要是瓶子、水罐和烧杯)的比例几乎相等,这与早期几乎完全被放置在坟墓中的陶器不同。根据发现地点和其他已知信息判断,在中世纪晚期,在坟墓中放置船只的习俗仅限于多瑙河、莫拉瓦河、伊巴尔河、德里纳河和涅雷特瓦河沿岸的少数地区。这些地区位于杜布罗夫尼克腹地、黑塞哥维那、波斯尼亚和塞尔维亚境内,与主要的商队路线有关,这与我们对玻璃发现的考虑有关。从上述所有地区的例子看来,唯一有意义的区别在于葬礼仪式中使用的玻璃器皿的类型- -塞尔维亚和克罗地亚使用的是瓶子,波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那使用的是饮水器皿。尽管这似乎有理由假设,在向死者献祭的习俗中存在一定的地区差异,但在这一点上,任何结论都是高度推测的,特别是如果只基于现有的考古数据。人种学研究表明,这种风俗也是零星的,在塞尔维亚和保加利亚一直延续到19世纪末。对中世纪晚期和现代早期墓葬中出土的器皿的分析揭示了许多巴尔干中部地区的共同特征,但也有一些地区差异。然而,考虑到处理过的试样在整个回收材料中的比例,这里提出的假设和结果只能作为初步的。这一习俗的一些表现形式仍然模糊不清,这一事实使以前提出的一些解释不过是毫无根据的猜测,这是操纵的肥沃土壤。因此,除了分析考古材料之外,还需要对这个问题的其他方面进行彻底的研究,首先是用石板和石碑盖棺的现象,以及整个丧葬实践。[南斯拉夫]塞族共和国部长项目;[177021]城市化进程[j]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Starinar
Starinar Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Production of ceramic building material in ancient Viminacium Zeus and Hera Souideptēnoi: The sanctuary at Belava mountain near Turres/Pirot Circular enclosure from the early copper age in north-western Serbia site of Sancina in Desic, near Sabac (excavations 2017-2019) Bronze age burials within the Morava, Nisava and Timok basins The vicinal road between Sirmium and the great canal of Probus. Exploring roman roads in the Glac study area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1