Relationship between cervical excisional treatment for CIN and obstetrical outcome.

IF 1 Q2 Medicine Minerva ginecologica Pub Date : 2020-11-03 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04678-X
M. Monti, Debora D’aniello, A. Scopelliti, V. Tibaldi, G. Santangelo, V. Colagiovanni, A. Giannini, V. Di Donato, I. Palaia, G. Perniola, A. Giancotti, L. Muzii, P. Benedetti Panici
{"title":"Relationship between cervical excisional treatment for CIN and obstetrical outcome.","authors":"M. Monti, Debora D’aniello, A. Scopelliti, V. Tibaldi, G. Santangelo, V. Colagiovanni, A. Giannini, V. Di Donato, I. Palaia, G. Perniola, A. Giancotti, L. Muzii, P. Benedetti Panici","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04678-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThe aim of our systematic review is the assessment of effects of excisional treatments for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on preterm delivery (PD), lower birth weight (LBW), preterm premature rupture of membrane (PPROM) and obstetrical outcomes.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA structured search was carried out in PubMed-Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases through November 30, 2019. The search included a combination of the following terms:\" Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure LEEP\",\" Large Loop Excision of Transformation Zone LLETZ \",\" Cold-Knife Conization CKC\",\" Laser Cervical Conization CLC\", \"preterm delivery\" and \"neonatal outcome\".\n\n\nRESULTS\nThirty-two (32) of 561 publications considered were included: 28 retrospective series, 2 prospective studies and 2 multicenter trials. Globally in several studies there was a significant increase in PD, measured by the relative risk, in the women underwent a surgical procedure for the CIN. In their majority, the studies were retrospective and therefore a high risk of bias.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThis systematic review shows that the surgical treatment of the CIN was associated with an increased risk of PD, LBW and pPROM before 37 pregnancy weeks compared to untreated women, especially in a CKC and LLETZ procedure. Moreover, the increase of the of PD was associated with cone size, cervical length, repeated treatment and a short conization-to-pregnancy interval.","PeriodicalId":18745,"journal":{"name":"Minerva ginecologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva ginecologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04678-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of our systematic review is the assessment of effects of excisional treatments for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on preterm delivery (PD), lower birth weight (LBW), preterm premature rupture of membrane (PPROM) and obstetrical outcomes. METHODS A structured search was carried out in PubMed-Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases through November 30, 2019. The search included a combination of the following terms:" Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure LEEP"," Large Loop Excision of Transformation Zone LLETZ "," Cold-Knife Conization CKC"," Laser Cervical Conization CLC", "preterm delivery" and "neonatal outcome". RESULTS Thirty-two (32) of 561 publications considered were included: 28 retrospective series, 2 prospective studies and 2 multicenter trials. Globally in several studies there was a significant increase in PD, measured by the relative risk, in the women underwent a surgical procedure for the CIN. In their majority, the studies were retrospective and therefore a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review shows that the surgical treatment of the CIN was associated with an increased risk of PD, LBW and pPROM before 37 pregnancy weeks compared to untreated women, especially in a CKC and LLETZ procedure. Moreover, the increase of the of PD was associated with cone size, cervical length, repeated treatment and a short conization-to-pregnancy interval.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫颈切除术治疗CIN与产科预后的关系。
目的:评价宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)手术治疗对早产(PD)、低出生体重(LBW)、胎膜早破(PPROM)和产科结局的影响。方法在截至2019年11月30日的PubMed-Medline、Embase和Cochrane对照试验注册数据库中进行结构化检索。搜索包括以下术语的组合:“环电手术切除程序LEEP”,“大环切除转化区LLETZ”,“冷刀锥化CKC”,“激光宫颈锥化CLC”,“早产”和“新生儿结局”。结果纳入561篇文献中的32篇:28篇回顾性研究、2篇前瞻性研究和2篇多中心试验。在全球范围内的几项研究中,通过相对风险来衡量,在接受CIN手术的妇女中,PD显著增加。大多数研究都是回顾性的,因此有很高的偏倚风险。结论:本系统综述显示,与未治疗的妇女相比,CIN的手术治疗与妊娠37周前PD、LBW和pPROM的风险增加有关,特别是CKC和LLETZ手术。此外,PD的增加与锥体大小、宫颈长度、重复治疗和锥体到妊娠间隔短有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva ginecologica
Minerva ginecologica OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Ginecologica publishes scientific papers on obstetrics and gynecology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Minilaparoscopy in gynecology: applications, benefits and limitations. Re-birth in a Covid hospital: a point of view. Endometriosis-associated infertility: surgery or IVF? Cesarean delivery: an evidence-based review on of the technique. Approaching ovarian endometrioma with medical therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1