All-cause and tumor-specific mortality trends in elderly primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgical sciences Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2019-10-08 DOI:10.23736/S0390-5616.19.04785-4
Taylor Furst, Haydn Hoffman, Lawrence S Chin
{"title":"All-cause and tumor-specific mortality trends in elderly primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) analysis.","authors":"Taylor Furst, Haydn Hoffman, Lawrence S Chin","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.19.04785-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) literature indicates that younger patients benefit from improved survival; however, this benefit is not shared by those 70+ years of age. The purpose of this study was to examine mortality trends in PCNSL patients 70+ years of age to better understand why improved prognosis has not yet reached this rapidly growing population subset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two thousand seventy-five cases (1973-2012, age at diagnosis 70+ years) within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox Regression analyses. Variables include age at diagnosis, decade of diagnosis (1=1973-1982, 2=1983-1992, 3=1993-2002, 4=2003-2012), sex, race and surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before stratification, both univariate and multivariate analyses agreed that patients aged 70-74 years at diagnosis lived the longest, while those 85+ years lived the shortest (median±SD; 6.0±0.5 months vs. 2.0±0.2 months, respectively, P<0.0005); women lived longer than men (5.0±0.3 months vs. 4.0±0.3 months, respectively, P=0.01); patients who received surgery (6.0±0.5 months) lived longer than those who did not (contraindicated=1.0±0.5 months, P<0.0005; not performed=4.0±0.3 months, P<0.0005). Univariate analysis showed decade 4 lived longer than only decade 3 (4.0±0.3 vs. 4.0±0.5, respectively, P=0.008), while multivariate analysis showed decade 4 lived longer than both 2 (5.0±0.8 months, P=0.03) and 3 (P<0.0005). Following stratification, decade and sex no longer influenced survival. Race did not influence survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimal clinically meaningful improvements in elderly PCNSL patient all-cause and tumor-specific mortality have been made since 1973, while the best predictors of longevity include younger age and surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.19.04785-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) literature indicates that younger patients benefit from improved survival; however, this benefit is not shared by those 70+ years of age. The purpose of this study was to examine mortality trends in PCNSL patients 70+ years of age to better understand why improved prognosis has not yet reached this rapidly growing population subset.

Methods: Two thousand seventy-five cases (1973-2012, age at diagnosis 70+ years) within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox Regression analyses. Variables include age at diagnosis, decade of diagnosis (1=1973-1982, 2=1983-1992, 3=1993-2002, 4=2003-2012), sex, race and surgery.

Results: Before stratification, both univariate and multivariate analyses agreed that patients aged 70-74 years at diagnosis lived the longest, while those 85+ years lived the shortest (median±SD; 6.0±0.5 months vs. 2.0±0.2 months, respectively, P<0.0005); women lived longer than men (5.0±0.3 months vs. 4.0±0.3 months, respectively, P=0.01); patients who received surgery (6.0±0.5 months) lived longer than those who did not (contraindicated=1.0±0.5 months, P<0.0005; not performed=4.0±0.3 months, P<0.0005). Univariate analysis showed decade 4 lived longer than only decade 3 (4.0±0.3 vs. 4.0±0.5, respectively, P=0.008), while multivariate analysis showed decade 4 lived longer than both 2 (5.0±0.8 months, P=0.03) and 3 (P<0.0005). Following stratification, decade and sex no longer influenced survival. Race did not influence survival.

Conclusions: Minimal clinically meaningful improvements in elderly PCNSL patient all-cause and tumor-specific mortality have been made since 1973, while the best predictors of longevity include younger age and surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤 (PCNSL) 患者的全因死亡率和肿瘤特异性死亡率趋势:监测、流行病学和最终结果 (SEER) 分析。
背景:最近的原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)文献表明,年轻患者的生存率有所提高;然而,70 岁以上的患者并没有从中受益。本研究的目的是检查 70 岁以上 PCNSL 患者的死亡率趋势,以更好地了解为什么预后改善尚未惠及这一快速增长的人群亚群:在 Kaplan-Meier 和多变量 Cox 回归分析中纳入了监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中的 2,75 个病例(1973-2012 年,诊断年龄 70 岁以上)。变量包括诊断年龄、诊断年代(1=1973-1982 年,2=1983-1992 年,3=1993-2002 年,4=2003-2012 年)、性别、种族和手术:结果:在进行分层之前,单变量和多变量分析均认为,诊断时年龄在70-74岁的患者寿命最长,而85岁以上的患者寿命最短(中位数±SD;分别为6.0±0.5个月和2.0±0.2个月):自1973年以来,老年PCNSL患者的全因死亡率和肿瘤特异性死亡率几乎没有临床意义的改善,而寿命的最佳预测因素包括较年轻的年龄和手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of intra-operative skull fixation techniques on cervical sagittal parameters. Normal pressure hydrocephalus treatment: is it time to rethink? Roxadustat protects oxidative stress and tissue injury in the brain induced by ischemic stroke via the HIF-1α/NRF2 axis. Follow-up neuroimaging after non-perimesencephalic, angiogram-negative subarachnoid hemorrhage. Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: surgical outcomes in 65 patients, review of the literature and proposal for an anatomical and radiological classification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1