The Tertium Comparationis in Constrastive Linguistics. A Methodological View

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistica Pragensia Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.2478/V10017-010-0002-6
J. Pekelder
{"title":"The Tertium Comparationis in Constrastive Linguistics. A Methodological View","authors":"J. Pekelder","doi":"10.2478/V10017-010-0002-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the central methodological problems within contrastive linguistics concerns the nature of the tertium comparationis (TC). On the whole, we can distinguish two approaches. The first one induces the TC directly from the language data and is universalistic. The second deduces the TC from a metatheory about the intrinsic characteristics of natural language and is relativistic. The present contribution serves a strictly methodological purpose, namely to present some new arguments in favour of the latter approach.","PeriodicalId":40638,"journal":{"name":"Linguistica Pragensia","volume":"20 1","pages":"22-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2478/V10017-010-0002-6","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistica Pragensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/V10017-010-0002-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the central methodological problems within contrastive linguistics concerns the nature of the tertium comparationis (TC). On the whole, we can distinguish two approaches. The first one induces the TC directly from the language data and is universalistic. The second deduces the TC from a metatheory about the intrinsic characteristics of natural language and is relativistic. The present contribution serves a strictly methodological purpose, namely to present some new arguments in favour of the latter approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
约束语言学中的Tertium比较。方法论观点
对比语言学的核心方法论问题之一是比较词的性质。总的来说,我们可以区分两种方法。第一种方法直接从语言数据中归纳出TC,具有普遍性。第二种理论是从自然语言内在特征的元理论出发,是相对论性的。本文的贡献完全是为了方法论的目的,即提出一些支持后一种方法的新论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistica Pragensia
Linguistica Pragensia LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tracing back the history of Italian Attributive-Appositive Noun+Noun compounds: First outcomes “Il libro di lettura non sia un centone di trite nozioni”: i manuali di lettura nei programmi ministeriali per la scuola elementare (1860–1905) Anglicisms: Towards defining their concept and typology Writer-reader interaction in L2 learner academic discourse: Reader engagement in Czech students’ Master’s theses The Catalan language as seen by foreign travellers in the second third of the 19th century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1