English back-formation in the 20th and the early 21st centuries

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistica Pragensia Pub Date : 2012-01-29 DOI:10.2478/V10017-012-0007-4
Naděžda Stašková
{"title":"English back-formation in the 20th and the early 21st centuries","authors":"Naděžda Stašková","doi":"10.2478/V10017-012-0007-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Naděžda Staskova: ENGLISH BACK-FORMATION IN THE 20th AND THE EARLY\n21st CENTURIES\nThe subject of the present study is a description and analysis of English back-formation in the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century. Investigation of an overall sample of 768 back-formed items has resulted in the following findings: Productivity of back-formation remains on the same level as it was in the first half of the 20th century. The most productive process is formation of verbs from action nouns. Back-formation of verbs from agent nouns has decreased, formation of verbs from adjectives almost disappeared. Adjectives can be seen as a minor source of back-formed nouns. There is a growth in involvement of compounds in this process. The most frequent subtracted suffixes are -ing, -ion/-ation and -er,\nall of them being involved in the formation of verbs. Stylistically unmarked items prevail, but they are often limited in use. Prefix back-formations continue to be formed. Inflectional back-formations seem to be on the decline. The class of adjectives back-formed from agent nouns is a new type that might continue in occurrence. From the analysis of the material investigated, the following main conclusion has been made: Back-formation can be considered a transparent, analysable and productive word-formation process, which has an indisputable potential for generating new words in the future.","PeriodicalId":40638,"journal":{"name":"Linguistica Pragensia","volume":"22 1","pages":"98-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2478/V10017-012-0007-4","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistica Pragensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/V10017-012-0007-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Naděžda Staskova: ENGLISH BACK-FORMATION IN THE 20th AND THE EARLY 21st CENTURIES The subject of the present study is a description and analysis of English back-formation in the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century. Investigation of an overall sample of 768 back-formed items has resulted in the following findings: Productivity of back-formation remains on the same level as it was in the first half of the 20th century. The most productive process is formation of verbs from action nouns. Back-formation of verbs from agent nouns has decreased, formation of verbs from adjectives almost disappeared. Adjectives can be seen as a minor source of back-formed nouns. There is a growth in involvement of compounds in this process. The most frequent subtracted suffixes are -ing, -ion/-ation and -er, all of them being involved in the formation of verbs. Stylistically unmarked items prevail, but they are often limited in use. Prefix back-formations continue to be formed. Inflectional back-formations seem to be on the decline. The class of adjectives back-formed from agent nouns is a new type that might continue in occurrence. From the analysis of the material investigated, the following main conclusion has been made: Back-formation can be considered a transparent, analysable and productive word-formation process, which has an indisputable potential for generating new words in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20世纪和21世纪初的英语逆构词
Naděžda Staskova: 20世纪和21世纪初的英语反语本研究的主题是对20世纪和21世纪初英语反语的描述和分析。通过对768件反造型物品的调查,得出以下结论:反造型的生产效率与20世纪上半叶保持在同一水平。最有生产力的过程是由动作名词构成动词。由代理名词反构词的动词减少了,由形容词反构词的动词几乎消失了。形容词可以被看作是反形式名词的一个次要来源。在这个过程中,化合物的参与越来越多。最常被删减的后缀是-ing、-ion/-ation和-er,它们都与动词的构成有关。风格上没有标记的物品普遍存在,但它们的使用往往有限。前缀反向排列继续形成。屈折后阵型似乎正在减少。由代理名词反向形成的形容词是一种可能继续出现的新类型。通过对调查材料的分析,得出了以下主要结论:反构词可以被认为是一个透明的、可分析的、富有成效的构词过程,它在未来产生新词的潜力是无可争辩的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistica Pragensia
Linguistica Pragensia LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tracing back the history of Italian Attributive-Appositive Noun+Noun compounds: First outcomes “Il libro di lettura non sia un centone di trite nozioni”: i manuali di lettura nei programmi ministeriali per la scuola elementare (1860–1905) Anglicisms: Towards defining their concept and typology Writer-reader interaction in L2 learner academic discourse: Reader engagement in Czech students’ Master’s theses The Catalan language as seen by foreign travellers in the second third of the 19th century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1