Prison Privatization: The (Ir)Relevance of Accounting

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting Accounting and the Public Interest Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.2308/API.2010.10.1.122
J. Andrew
{"title":"Prison Privatization: The (Ir)Relevance of Accounting","authors":"J. Andrew","doi":"10.2308/API.2010.10.1.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: In 2008, the New South Wales (NSW) Government announced its intention to privatize two of the State’s prisons. This was a significant change in policy, a move that was justified publicly on the grounds that it would produce significant cost savings. This paper explores the way costs have been referenced within the public discussion on prison privatization in NSW to provide a basis for the decision. Little externally verifiable evidence could be found to support the government’s claim that the proposed privatization would save tax-payer funds; instead, this work shows how justifications based on costs became self referential, taking on a life of their own. Given that there is little “real” evidence to argue the government’s policy was rational on cost grounds, this paper explores how references to costs in public debate can be used to justify and reinforce privatization decisions without significant critique.","PeriodicalId":38883,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and the Public Interest","volume":"10 1","pages":"122-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2308/API.2010.10.1.122","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and the Public Interest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/API.2010.10.1.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In 2008, the New South Wales (NSW) Government announced its intention to privatize two of the State’s prisons. This was a significant change in policy, a move that was justified publicly on the grounds that it would produce significant cost savings. This paper explores the way costs have been referenced within the public discussion on prison privatization in NSW to provide a basis for the decision. Little externally verifiable evidence could be found to support the government’s claim that the proposed privatization would save tax-payer funds; instead, this work shows how justifications based on costs became self referential, taking on a life of their own. Given that there is little “real” evidence to argue the government’s policy was rational on cost grounds, this paper explores how references to costs in public debate can be used to justify and reinforce privatization decisions without significant critique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监狱私有化:会计的(Ir)相关性
摘要:2008年,新南威尔士州政府宣布打算将该州的两所监狱私有化。这是一项重大的政策变化,公开证明此举是合理的,理由是它将大大节省成本。本文探讨了在新南威尔士州监狱私有化的公众讨论中成本被引用的方式,为决策提供依据。政府声称拟议中的私有化将节省纳税人的资金,但几乎找不到外部可证实的证据;相反,这项工作表明,基于成本的理由是如何成为自我参照的,占据了自己的生命。鉴于几乎没有“真实”证据证明政府的政策在成本方面是理性的,本文探讨了如何在公共辩论中引用成本来证明和加强私有化决策而不受到重大批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting and the Public Interest
Accounting and the Public Interest Business, Management and Accounting-Accounting
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Self-Concept Priming and Message Framing As Strategies for Improving Individuals’ Compliance: A Case Study of Bicultural Taxpayers’ Tip Reporting Editorial Policy The Impact of the Global Pandemic on Ethics, Professionalism, and Judgment in Accounting and Financial Reporting Data Breach Severity and Debt Market Responses Covers and Front Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1