ANALYZING SUCCESSION MANAGEMENT PRACTISE IN THE CONTEXT OF ORGANIZATIONAL SURVIVAL: A QUALITATIVE APPROACH

IF 1.2 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL International Journal for Quality Research Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.24874/ijqr13.02-11
Olatunji Fadeyi, Kehinde Oladele, D. Imhonopi, Chijioke E. Nwachukwu
{"title":"ANALYZING SUCCESSION MANAGEMENT PRACTISE IN THE CONTEXT OF ORGANIZATIONAL SURVIVAL: A QUALITATIVE APPROACH","authors":"Olatunji Fadeyi, Kehinde Oladele, D. Imhonopi, Chijioke E. Nwachukwu","doi":"10.24874/ijqr13.02-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Qualitative data analysis methods are becoming more and more useful in management sciences. In this paper, an attempt is made to qualitatively ascertain the extent to which effective management succession influences organizational survival. An open-ended interview schedule with 15 questions was administered on 15 randomly selected individuals belonging to top, mid and low level management cadre across 5 money deposit banks in Nigeria. Qualitative content analysis was used to carry out coding of the responses. Cohen Kappa (κ) intercoder reliability test of trustworthiness gave a coding consistency value of 0.86, showing a near-perfect agreement. The final themes generated include; succession ingredients; succession results, and succession checks. It was found that for succession to truly drive an organization towards survival, certain key inputs, otherwise known as ingredients must be in place. Furthermore, the many short-comings in the process of succession must be checked and corrected. If rightly corrected, succession checks could help gain positive results, however, if not carefully monitored, results could be negative.","PeriodicalId":45812,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24874/ijqr13.02-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Qualitative data analysis methods are becoming more and more useful in management sciences. In this paper, an attempt is made to qualitatively ascertain the extent to which effective management succession influences organizational survival. An open-ended interview schedule with 15 questions was administered on 15 randomly selected individuals belonging to top, mid and low level management cadre across 5 money deposit banks in Nigeria. Qualitative content analysis was used to carry out coding of the responses. Cohen Kappa (κ) intercoder reliability test of trustworthiness gave a coding consistency value of 0.86, showing a near-perfect agreement. The final themes generated include; succession ingredients; succession results, and succession checks. It was found that for succession to truly drive an organization towards survival, certain key inputs, otherwise known as ingredients must be in place. Furthermore, the many short-comings in the process of succession must be checked and corrected. If rightly corrected, succession checks could help gain positive results, however, if not carefully monitored, results could be negative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织生存语境下的继任管理实践分析&一种定性方法
定性数据分析方法在管理科学中越来越有用。本文试图定性地确定有效的管理继承对组织生存的影响程度。随机抽取尼日利亚5家存款银行的高、中、低层管理干部15人,进行15个问题的开放式面试。采用定性内容分析对回答进行编码。Cohen Kappa (κ)互编码信度测试的可信度编码一致性值为0.86,显示出近乎完美的一致性。最终生成的主题包括;连续配料;继承结果,继承检查。研究发现,为了让继任真正推动一个组织走向生存,某些关键的投入,或者被称为成分,必须到位。此外,必须检查和纠正继任过程中的许多缺点。如果正确纠正,继任检查可能有助于获得积极的结果,但如果不仔细监督,结果可能是消极的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Quality Research examines new research and development at the quality. It provides a common forum for both frontline industrial management as well as pioneering academic research. The journal''s multidisciplinary approach draws from such fields as benchmarking, business excellence, e-quality, management systems, performance measurements and management, proces management and improvement, quality management, six sigma, supply chain management, quality and leadership, quality information systems, quality of life.
期刊最新文献
THE QUALITY AND COMPETITIVENESS OF THE SERBIAN DEFENSE INDUSTRY ON THE GLOBAL ARMS AND MILITARY EQUIPMENT MARKET ATTRACTING AND RETAINING EMPLOYEES AS A RESULT OF EFFECTIVE EMPLOYER BRAND MANAGEMENT QUALITY CONTROL IN THE SOCIAL MARKET ECONOMY: RESPONSE TO COMPETITION, MANIFESTATION OF CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY OR A TASK FOR PUBLIC-PRIVATE MONITORING IMPROVING QUALITY OF 2D ICE LOAD ESTIMATION ON FREEZED PILES FORMATION QUALITY OF A STRATEGIC ALLIANCE – THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SCORING MODEL TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTIC OF THE RECYCLING INDUSTRY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1