María C. Scarpino, Erika C. Bosch, S. Hak, Camila Ruiz-Moreno, Brenda A. Salvatierra, Jorge I. Parras, Augusto P. Bayol
{"title":"Disección aórtica: verdadero valor diagnóstico de la radiografía de tórax","authors":"María C. Scarpino, Erika C. Bosch, S. Hak, Camila Ruiz-Moreno, Brenda A. Salvatierra, Jorge I. Parras, Augusto P. Bayol","doi":"10.24875/rar.m22000009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"objective: To evaluate the diagnostic capacity of the radiological signs for aortic dissection (AD) and their applicability for the diagnosis, as well as to establish a cut-off value for left mediastinal width in AD and determine its sensitivity (S) and spe-cificity (E). Method: From a high complexity cardiovascular institute, 39 patients were selected and chest X-rays were perfor-med from August 1, 2018 to February 1, 2019. Selection criteria involved those who underwent computed tomography angio-graphy of thoracic aorta for clinical suspicion of AD. results: Within the sample, 72% were men (mean 63 years old), with hypertension as a most common risk factor. 43% of the patient had AD, 76% were type B. The mean maximum mediastinal width showed a difference of 1.5 cm between patients with AD and those without it. In contrast, the difference was 2 cm for the left mediastinal width. Maximum mediastinal width and left mediastinal width were statistically significant signs. Left mediastinal width presented good diagnostic capacity (area under the curve: 0.84). Cut-off point of 5.39 cm for the left mediastinal width was calculated (S: 82%; E: 77%). Finally, widening of the aortic knob, ascending/descending aorta or asymmetry between both showed to be statistically significant signs. Conclusions: Radiological signs for the diagnosis of AD was vali-dated. Also, a cut-off point for the left mediastinal width of 5.39 cm was found with a very good diagnostic capacity.","PeriodicalId":38131,"journal":{"name":"Revista Argentina de Radiologia","volume":"11655 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Argentina de Radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/rar.m22000009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
objective: To evaluate the diagnostic capacity of the radiological signs for aortic dissection (AD) and their applicability for the diagnosis, as well as to establish a cut-off value for left mediastinal width in AD and determine its sensitivity (S) and spe-cificity (E). Method: From a high complexity cardiovascular institute, 39 patients were selected and chest X-rays were perfor-med from August 1, 2018 to February 1, 2019. Selection criteria involved those who underwent computed tomography angio-graphy of thoracic aorta for clinical suspicion of AD. results: Within the sample, 72% were men (mean 63 years old), with hypertension as a most common risk factor. 43% of the patient had AD, 76% were type B. The mean maximum mediastinal width showed a difference of 1.5 cm between patients with AD and those without it. In contrast, the difference was 2 cm for the left mediastinal width. Maximum mediastinal width and left mediastinal width were statistically significant signs. Left mediastinal width presented good diagnostic capacity (area under the curve: 0.84). Cut-off point of 5.39 cm for the left mediastinal width was calculated (S: 82%; E: 77%). Finally, widening of the aortic knob, ascending/descending aorta or asymmetry between both showed to be statistically significant signs. Conclusions: Radiological signs for the diagnosis of AD was vali-dated. Also, a cut-off point for the left mediastinal width of 5.39 cm was found with a very good diagnostic capacity.